this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
440 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

58223 readers
3694 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 22 points 5 hours ago

So, instead of iterating the ancient concept of frontal assault ads towards something less intrusive and more engaging, they go the black mirror path of force feeding ads?

Sounds about right regarding the decision makers have as much creativity as a Vogon.

Man I really hate those suit MBA circlejerk idiots in positions of power.

[–] Buttons@programming.dev 236 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (18 children)

Ads will always be detectable because you cannot speed up or skip an ad like you can the rest of the video.

If they do make it so you can speed up or skip the ad sections of a video, mission accomplished.

If all else fails, I'd enjoy a plugin that just blanks the video and mutes the sound whenever an ad is playing. I'll enjoy the few seconds of quiet, and hopefully I can use that time to break out of the mentally unhealthy doom spiral that is the typical YouTube experience.

[–] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

i remember when i put a video at 2x speed the next ad i got was also at 2x speed lmao

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 36 points 8 hours ago

always be detectable

Maybe with some content ID system… but you’ve just predicted their 2025 update which we might imagine would go something like this:

[–] Celestus@lemm.ee 69 points 13 hours ago

Yep. YouTube must include a manifest with each video to tell the player what time ranges are un-skippable. Baked in ads were doomed from the beginning 🤡

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 51 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

[Enshittification intensifies]

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 42 minutes ago

Well it’s what people want. No one even is complaining about the ads wants to pay for anything. And stuff costs money no matter what people choose to believe. Creators need to eat YouTube has costs. Money has to come from somewhere.

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 187 points 21 hours ago (16 children)

Imagine all the cool stuff we could be doing if we weren’t wasting the time of hundreds of engineers figuring out how to shove ads in people’s faces.

[–] orl0pl@lemmy.world 57 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is ad driven economy and bar must go 🆙

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 32 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

"Line go up" is the animating force of the age, the critical philosophical principal around which our entire society is arranged.

Gives me a fucking headache.

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 19 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

“Line go up” is the animating force of the ~~age~~ the rich and powerful, the critical philosophical principal around which ~~our entire society~~ their lives ~~is~~ are arranged.

I choose not to confuse their values as mine or that of my community.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Nima@leminal.space 206 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm getting tired, man. these people are truly just the shittiest individuals ever.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 95 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

MBAs on their way to destroy their company's relationship with their customers and cause a socioeconomic disaster (their numbers will grow by 0.01% 💪💪)

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 35 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

If you don’t pay for something, you are not a customer, you are the product. If you pay for Youtube, you don’t see the ads, but you are also still their product. Lose /Lose

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] xnx@slrpnk.net 69 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Imma start subscribing to the RSS feeds of torrents made for specific channels before i watch ads.

If youtube wants to make their website so hostile its easier to get better versions of youtube videos without YouTube then those games will be played.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago

The arms race continues.

[–] zephr_c@lemm.ee 85 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Honestly, I've kind of always wondered why they didn't just do this. It's always seemed like the obvious thing to me.

I mean, I hope it doesn't work, because screw Google, but I'm still surprised it took them this long to try it.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 75 points 21 hours ago (11 children)

Because it's much more expensive. What they're talking about here is basically modifying the video file as they stream it. That costs CPU/GPU cycles. Given that only about 10% of users block ads, this is only worth doing if they can get the cost down low enough that those extra ad views actually net them revenue.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 46 minutes ago

10% where do you get that. The data I have heard is it’s around a third of all internet users globally.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bogusmcfakester@lemmy.world 80 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm really getting the push I need to finally get rid of the last couple Google services I still use

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

MythTV solved this long ago. We already have the tech to bypass this shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›