this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
360 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59389 readers
3187 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite US dominance in so many different areas of technology, we're sadly somewhat of a backwater when it comes to car headlamps. It's been this way for many decades, a result of restrictive federal vehicle regulations that get updated rarely. The latest lights to try to work their way through red tape and onto the road are active-matrix LED lamps, which can shape their beams to avoid blinding oncoming drivers.

From the 1960s, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards allowed for only sealed high- and low-beam headlamps, and as a result, automakers like Mercedes-Benz would sell cars with less capable lighting in North America than it offered to European customers.

A decade ago, this was still the case. In 2014, Audi tried unsuccessfully to bring its new laser high-beam technology to US roads. Developed in the racing crucible that is the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the laser lights illuminate much farther down the road than the high beams of the time, but in this case, the lighting tech had to satisfy both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Food and Drug Administration, which has regulatory oversight for any laser products.

The good news is that by 2019, laser high beams were finally an available option on US roads, albeit once the power got turned down to reduce their range.

NHTSA's opposition to advanced lighting tech is not entirely misplaced. Obviously, being able to see far down the road at night is a good thing for a driver. On the other hand, being dazzled or blinded by the bright headlights of an approaching driver is categorically not a good thing. Nor is losing your night vision to the glare of a car (it's always a pickup) behind you with too-bright lights that fill your mirrors.

This is where active-matrix LED high beams come in, which use clusters of controllable LED pixels. Think of it like a more advanced version of the "auto high beam" function found on many newer cars, which uses a car's forward-looking sensors to know when to dim the lights and when to leave the high beams on.

Here, sensor data is used much more granularly. Instead of turning off the entire high beam, the car only turns off individual pixels, so the roadway is still illuminated, but a car a few hundred feet up the road won't be.

Rather than design entirely new headlight clusters for the US, most OEMs' solution was to offer the hardware here but disable the beam-shaping function—easy to do when it's just software. But in 2022, NHTSA relented—nine years after Toyota first asked the regulator to reconsider its stance.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 91 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Oncoming drivers? I'm getting blasted by "cars" behind me. Fucking trucks or even lifted trucks with their headlights at my eye level. And it seems like lights are getting brighter as well, or people drive with their high beams on. My rearview mirror is auto dimming, which helps a lot. But since I drive the speed limit these trucks are swerving back and forth behind me, blinding me via the side mirrors.

Man we really really need restrictions on size and weight of cars. It's getting ridiculous out there.

[–] nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

people actually drive with their high beams on 24/7 even on lighted roads and traffic. I was in an Uber recently and the driver did this. I already drive a relatively high riding SUV and I get blinded by those lifted trucks regularly. people are insane and only care about themselves

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep, I'm only 35 and remember when almost all drivers generally only used hibeams in situations of serious low visibility due to fog or snow or rain, or a totally unlit road at night out in the middle of no where, and where it was common courtesy to turn your hibeams off when someone is coming toward you on the other side of the road, turn em back on when they pass.

Seems like basically no one does this at all any more, barring some longhaul truckers.

Its just super brights all the time.

If you have an astigmatism, just get fucked, crash and die I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 62 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's not at all clear to me that an actively-shaped beam, which can potentially improperly detect where light should be and blind drivers in that failure scenario, is preferable to simply placing restrictions on how high the light can be.

It'd permit for lights to extend further ahead down the road in some cases, but I have more of an issue with being blinded by headlamps -- sometimes non-stock, improperly-mounted ones -- than with not being able to see far enough down the road at night.

[–] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I bike at night often. Very few turn off their blinders for me. It's so bad that I have to come to a full stop until the car passes. If you have ever turned off your blinders for bikers at night: Thank you, seriously. We appreciate it more than you know.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

That's the reason I think matrix lights should be outlawed. They allow plausible deniability for the driver. "oh sorry, is my matrix broken?" No, it never worked to begin with; bikes and pedestrians are blinded. Drivers on the opposite lane are blinded if there's a divider between sensor and lamp. You're illuminating the town like breaking dawn because your matrix doesn't care about sleep, either!

[–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And to all the cyclists who use a bright led lamp on their handlebar, remember to also point them down, not straight ahead. I've been blinded as a pedestrian and a driver by cyclists who don't position their lights correctly.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

As a cyclist who really tries to point their light downward to not blind others: amen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
  1. Install bringht LED lights which make your eyes audibly scream on your bike.
  2. Switch it on whenever such an idiot comes towards you.
  3. Avoid their sweering motion of sudden blindness when they loose control over their 4-Ton Monster truck.
  4. ....
  5. Profit

Alternatively, use a welding mask when cycling at night and leave the light switched on. Avoid planes which try to land on you.

/s ... just in case

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The light I use on my bike is on that I attach to the handle bar for each use, so it’s not super duper fixed - just meaning I can adjust it on the fly if I need to.

I 100% angle it up and point it right back at cats driving with their high beams on. Almost every time they turn theirs off and I lower my light back down.

I suspect a lot of them now are the automatic high beams that cars absolutely should not have.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Nobody wants it, they just want brighter lights for themselves to compensate for being blinded by the brighter lights of others, but actually to retaliate, nobody can have brighter brights than me!

We'd need regulations for this, which we'd never get, especially after the Chevron doctrine was reversed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Your low beams were fine 20 years ago. Don't create this expectation in drivers that they have to turn night into day. That only adds to the problem of asshole drivers prioritizing their ability to see over other people's ability to see. Matrix headlights are unnecessary and create orders of magnitude more light pollution

Blinding headlights are due to poorly aligned low beams, too bright LED headlights, bigger cars with their headlights mounted higher and higher. So the solutions are: low beam alignment that can't be made to blind you by the driver, regulation on luminosity and color spectrum of lights, stop financial incentives to make vehicles large, heavier, deadlier.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Low beams were fine until idiots started putting them four feet above the ground. Now they're in the eyes of anyone not driving a monster truck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itchick2014@midwest.social 33 points 1 month ago

I just want to see the day where as a pedestrian I don’t feel like my retinas are fried every time a car passes at night or has their brights on during the day (ugh). I know it is wishful thinking because apparently politicians don’t give a shit about pedestrians (or cyclists).

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My problem is my state (MI) refuses to enact any kind of road worthy certification process. We have too many trucks and cars with illegal headlights and brake lights. I've seen green, blue, purple headlights (mostly modded jeeps) and taillights so tinted I couldn't see them stopping during the day. And lifted trucks that never reposition their lights so you are blinded no matter what you drive.

We get laws that stop the new tech of active dimming but at the same time we have lazy chicken shit cops that just let these distracting things that are already illegal just slide on by. Might as well buy an import with the good lights or import the parts and install them yourself.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

We have too many trucks and cars with illegal headlights

considers

You know, thinking about it...we have traffic speed cameras that automatically detect speeding and issue fines.

It'd probably actually be pretty easy to have a sensor or series of sensors that just sit by a road and detect improperly-mounted headlights. You're just looking for a vehicle that's putting out too much light too high up.

You need some poles with light sensors at the appropriate height by the side of the road and a speeding-camera-style thing to grab the license plate. Maybe wait for a series of them to trip as a vehicle is coming down the road, to avoid false positives.

Actually, thinking about it...it'd be even easier than speeding cameras, because you aren't constrained to stick 'em where people are speeding. Can just put 'em at places like toll booths and such, where you already have someone stopping.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Or have the sensors mounted on the cop cars themselves. So driving by them can trigger an alert, it will give them the ability to confirm the readings or issue a fix it ticket that won't be an automatic fine unless the person is caught again. Shouldn't punish people that don't know their lights are illegal on the first offense.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nor is losing your night vision to the glare of a car (it's always a pickup) behind you with too-bright lights that fill your mirrors.

It really fucking is. Nothing is a bigger red flag to me than a pickup. 98% of pickup drivers are assholes.

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My catchphrase when driving has become "It's always a fucking pickup"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Controversial, but auto-highbeams should never have existed. Turning on high beams should always be manually triggered by the driver.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Auto high beams have done a pretty OK job at detecting oncoming cars, in my experience. People blasting every fucking house in the neighborhood with high beams at 25mph, on the other hand, is where my ange lies. High beams are for high speed or aggressive slop change, not low speeds.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am fine using my high beams in neighborhoods because those damn kids come out of nowhere, and the high beams light up more of the road. Black out curtains if it bothers you imo.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Lighting is the determining factor? I think the real problem is speed. With kids coming out of nowhere, people need to drive slower. With some regular low beams you should see plenty, no need to light up the whole neighborhood

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My experience is they blind me for a good ~3 seconds until it drops the high beams.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Nah. The issue is way more complex than that and begins in proper training for drivers and ends in some proper road worthy inspections of vehicles so that they at least have their lights correctly aligned and aimed.

There are no such issues in Europe. Sure, you get the occasional double blink from matrix led system, but I'd take those systems any day of the week over some who just forgot to turn off their high beams or has their lights aimed incorrectly

[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It seems to me like we didn't have this problem twenty years ago. If blinding LEDs are the problem, why not just not allow them anymore for headlights? It takes 5 seconds to pop in a new incandescent headlight on cars that have them, and well made ones can last 20+ years depending on the construction. Visibility is good and equivalent to some LEDs with higher end lamps, and it doesn't create a superbly unnatural light that impairs the other drivers, pedestrians, or nature. It would also reduce light pollution.

On very rare occasion, the progressive step forward, actually looks a lot like the road backwards. It would take a long time to implement, but anything worth doing is worth taking the time to do it right.

Auto sensing technology is going to be more of a glaring headache in 20 years, when you have half of the cars with failing sensors and everyone getting blinded even worse. Adaptive Driving Beams (ADB) are not a solution, it does not properly address the issues of glare, and it will likely only make the problem worse by further removing human interaction from headlight controls.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Visibility is good and equivalent to some LEDs with higher end lamps

No. Not even close. LEDs are blinding because they have such high output. That high output is what makes things visible.

[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's what high beams are for... Cars don't need to light the dark side of the moon, drivers only need to see the roadway in front of them. Both provide ample illumination, it's just one allows you to see the color of a zit on a mouse 3 miles away, which is entirely not necessary for safe night driving.

And I was saying that some higher end incandescent lamps are equivalent to some LEDs. I know there are LEDs that far exceed the lumens of traditional lamps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (9 children)
[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I fucking wish, we rarely get that here in North America. I had that on my old Mazda 3, and fucking loved it. I’d always keep them angled all the way down in the city with well-lit streets and only angle them up on the highway

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 5 points 1 month ago

That requires the driver to actually care

[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

That would need proper training - meaning a drivers license that's worth the plastic it occupies. Which it isn't. Compared to the EU, a north American driver's license is like letting a paper plane flyer in an A380 and saying "There's the light switch, there's the Autopilot, go fly".

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (9 children)

All you need is to have all car's lights be horizontally polarized and then all windshields have a vertical polarizer there I've fixed the problem.

Now basically the light would come out and only vertical polarizer light or scattered light would be accepted by everyone's windshields. If you've ever played with this setup on your own using a flashlight and polarizer shades, the color of almost all objects look so cool.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (7 children)

And pedestrians and cyclists?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fuck cyclists, pedestrians and residents, I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd just go for a "feature" that disables the on/off function (leaving the momentary function alone) of the hi-beam when a sensor/s detects light above a certain luminosity. I also think an extra cost to the registration could be tacked on for vehicles that are lifted or otherwise have headlights above a certain height that would scale with the said height.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePunnyMan@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I'm curious if the problem is how bright LED lights are or something else. I recently bought a car and it has an automatic brights option. Basically, it switched on the brights automatically for some situations. I turned it off because I felt it was turning them on when I didn't need them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Can anyone explain this part to me, like I’m five?

From the 1960s, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards allowed for only sealed high- and low-beam headlamps, and as a result, automakers like Mercedes-Benz would sell cars with less capable lighting in North America than it offered to European customers.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 1 month ago

Meaning it legally must be a sealed unit with only 2 states, high and low. In Europe and/or other places there may be multiple angle states and/or strip headlights or other stuff based on their specific regulations. The result is that the efficacy of US headlight systems have a hard upper bound for how effective they can be, based on what was practical to do in the 60s.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sealed beam headlights are the whole thing, lens, reflector, bulb all in one assembly. You don’t replace the bulb with these, you replace the entire light. Think old cars/trucks when everything had standardized round glass headlights. Not unique designs per model.

Because Mercedes Benz couldn’t use their fancy euro headlights for cars in the US, they had to use the standardized sealed beam lights, which were not as powerful.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

That is quite a complex task. Being able to focus the beam in a certain direction is one thing. And it is the easier part.

But where should it focus to? You cannot just base the up/down position of the head and therefore the lamp as such, you also need to know where the wearer is looking left or right of the direction of travel. Just imagine you are sitting in a car and a guy with such a headlamp is coming in your direction. All this biker needs to do is just turn his head and look at you for some reason, and blam! You are staring right into a blazing array of LEDs.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

It's because GM has deep pockets and doesn't want to pay one of their competitors a licensing fee to stay competitive.

[–] beerclue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

While my car was being repaired after a crash, the insurance company gave me a rental to use for the duration. The rental company only had a Land Rover Evoque (or something), and that car had the fancy led matrix lights. It was amazing! You could actually see the light being "shaped" on the road in front, going around incoming traffic, it was constantly moving. To me it was a bit distracting though...

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

because few people in this society spend money on something that makes other people's lives easier.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

More and more I am tempted to buy one of those 36,000 lumen flashlights and shine it at people who refuse to remove their high beams. You can tell when it’s just a tall truck and some asshole with high beams.

load more comments
view more: next ›