XeroxCool

Dropping in and not having to get back up to speed with a game has become more important to my gaming life than I wish it was. I don't have time to change it. Even minimal-story games like Valheim or Elite: Dangerous have become too cumbersome because I have to spend a bunch of time figuring out what I did last, what I need to gather, and what I need to build to progress. I can either go mine/sail iron in Valheim, I can hope my pirate hunter ship and pirate activity are close to where I last docked... Or I can just play some basic game and take 5 minutes to get up to speed instead of spending the first 45 minutes recalibrating my memory. It makes a difference when you might only play 3 times a week and have less than 2 hours left. I'm hoping next year goes better, but for now, it's battle Royale, team match, or racing games.

Obviously, there's a massive competitive attractiveness for some people to games like PUBG and CS as well. But it's not all trigger-finger addicts. Some of us are just trying to have an OK time, not the best time.

The pizza boy union filed too many reports about closed roads and having to find another way home

Gen Z already has some belief that Millennials did nothing but complain. No/not enough progress was made for all the protesting millennials cried for. It looks like Z is going the X apathetic route.

For about 5 years, I ignored theaters and said the same things as you. Now I'm back to going a few times a year. You don't have to buy the popcorn - I never have it at home, so why do I need it there? You don't take a date to a movie to talk during the movie, you go to share entertainment and have something easy to talk about from a shared experience later. There are many new movies, they just don't get the hype compared to movies with existing universes. It's not necessarily a bad thing to reuse existing IP, either, because it can help skip the initial exposition and put more action and development in the screen time. Obviously, there are plenty of examples of poor writing and weak attempts to keep some IP rolling.

What brings me to the theater (usually on a Tuesday with a discount) is the immersion. It helps me really get into the characters' experiences. It's not required because I certainly get into plenty of movies using my phone on planes (work travel), but it's something I choose to utilize. I'll also try to see movies where I expect dramatic cinematography. Movies like 1917, Dunkirk, and La La Land come to mind for originals while I'd include Bladerunner 2049, Dune 1+2, and Mad Max Fury/Furiosa in the reboot list. Anything Wes Anderson, too, if that's your flavor. I'm indifferent about superhero movies because the CGI is so overwhelming that it's indistinguishable from a video game to me, so it loses value. I understand your aversion to reboots, but I'd say one I missed and absolutely wish I had seen in theaters is Tron: Legacy because that has become one of my all-time favorite movies. It's nothing groundbreaking, but it's a beautiful crossroads of my visual and audio interests at the time with the score by Daft Punk. It's as if it's a sequel to Interstellar 5555, their album anime movie.

Pixar has some bangers, too. I realized at some point I was ignoring them because they seemed too hard to get into, when in reality I just wasn't trying. I thought I was too old, ignoring that I obviously already knew about the deeper themes in my childhood Pixar films. They're pretty original. Inside Out 1 was an emotional trainwreck and Coco and Soul were enjoyable as well.

I'm not trying to say you're wrong. It's your opinion. I'm just seeing what I used to think and want to offer some insight on where I am now. It's easy to miss the original titles because there's so much rehash out there. There's always another formulaic Marvel movie and a shoddy DC film coming up. We're flodded with content, so it's harder to get attached to a particular movie. I saw a meme or tweet that said something like "what ever happened to having families develop entire cult followings of some mediocre film because they only owned 15 VHS films?" and it stuck with me. Marvel is flooding theaters with mediocre superheros, Netflix is flooding streaming with mediocre everything, and Disney is flooding their platform with 80s-90s rehash. I get it. I was rolling my eyes when I heard Alien: Romulus was coming because I thought "yet another Alien?" and, when complaining, I looked up the list and found there's way less Alien movies than I thought. But the gems are still out there, even if you never visit a theater again. I keep a list of loose recommendations, torrent them, and will randomly press play on one and let it rip.

Reasonable reason: pre-2020 theaters would be packed sometimes and it's helpful to have assigned seats. It resolves seating disputes and gets people to go straight to their seats. When I saw Avengers End Game (or maybe Infinity War), they had to have employees spotting empty seats for everyone walking in.

Cynical theory: they're logging seat selection trends and going to move to tiered pricing like airplane seats

It doesn't say the screenshot must be full resolution and it doesn't say the screenshot is immediately uploaded. A couple seconds to downscale and compress would work the same as far as content identification is concerned

You say you don't care for Porsche IRL. If you have any interest in driving performance vehicles and have an opportunity to drive one, try to not pass it up. 10 years ago, I drove a 10-year-old 911 and it remains the best driver's car I've ever driven. So precise, so confident. It's what they're known for. I knocked them before because they always looked so understated and the owners seem pompous. While both can be true, it's still an excellent sports car. I'm out of the car scene and can't talk about modern hybrids/electrics/SUVs and wouldn't recommend a Panamera as the basis for your opinion.

FH4 just went semi-offline (no more seasonal or promotional content, still has online play/free roam randos). I wonder if that played a role in that pricing inversion. Last minute cash squeeze? Maybe it ushered the market away from 4 and into 5?

I do enjoy the FH titles. I wish there were more normal cars, but that's probably partly due to not keeping up with the latest hypercars. With limited time to play, I spend a ton of time cruising in semi-normal cars across the open world. One of the unusual activities is 4th+ gear highway pulls in some blundering V8. Just hear it wind out from idle to redline. FH1 remains my favorite story because it actually had a story, it felt. It was shallow, but it had a clear progression of races, rivalry, and all the world building for the horizon festival. The rest have just too many races, tournaments, and events thrown at you at once. Every race unlocks 4 more. FH2 did an amazing job introducing the open world, drive anywhere style although I found the European map to be bland. FH3's Australia was more diverse, but I was further overwhelmed by the number of map icons. I'm currently in FH4 and I suppose have finally accepted there's never going to be another "campaign" style title. I guess that's really the gaming industry as a whole with all the battle Royales and similar arcade-style games.

I guess I should hurry up and get FH5 before all the time-sensitively content runs out there, too, right? Damn consumer cyclism.

It depends on the situation. There's plenty of games that made the DLC era notorious by putting out games with only half the content as prior games. In the case of Forza Horizon, I feel they've provided substantial content in the base games, at least as far as maps and modes.

I will agree with OP about the number of DLC cars though, because it's excessive. I wish I could filter out DLC and stop being teased. It's particularly annoying when basically and entire manufacturer is DLC (Porsche in FH4 I think) or when some 3rd party sponsor brand drops a ton of "sponsor edition" cars. Maybe I'm just out of the pop loop but I do NOT need Hoonigan cars when I can modify any of the base cars to be stupid fast. I rest my cane.

If it doesn't go round, how can I tell it's working? Turns out, if the fan doesn't work, I don't beleive it's working either. Listen there's a set of rules for microwaves, ok?

I'm not your thread's OP but I want to know the same question (what were the seasons) because no, I don't know how fast glaciers reach that height either. Nothing about that implies denial of the validity, it's a question to help quantify the change. Varying 10ft between seasons means this is a massive change regardless of season. Varying 100ft, not so much. No, I don't beleive it'd actually be 100fr of change in 6 months, but I could see it being more than 10ft.

Pretty sure my polling place is open for more than 12 hours. Maybe it varies by state, but that should be a reasonable amount of time for over 99% of the population to get there. Obviously, some places are massively overrun and understaffed, especially in the "unfavorable" districts, but I've had no issues making it out in less than 10 minutes by leaving for work 20 minutes early.

And now we know you don't care