this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
198 points (98.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53969 readers
1020 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sceenshot showing youtube premium family plan price increased from SGD17.98 to SGD27.98

Cant believe they are increasing the prices this much in one go, gonna be going back to adblockers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Iloveyurianime@ani.social 5 points 4 hours ago

And of course this happened inline with the ads on pause so its either you pay us a fuck ton of money per month or suffer from advertisements thank god for ublock origin and firefox

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 13 points 22 hours ago

Well, once again they still hurt more the "legal" clients, nothing new really.

I still happily have my ad-less YT experience in all the devices I own (as a matter of fact, I just convinced my girlfriend to sideload a YT client to get her a similar experience of mine in her iPhone).

[–] BigLime@lemmy.ml 5 points 20 hours ago

Didn't even know Youtube premium was still a thing. Been too busy using FreeTube, NewPipe, and SmartTube to notice

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's so nice to live in the EU, where my right to block ads is protected by law.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's more so that you are allowed to try to block ads. If YouTube adds DRM or otherwise manages to stop usage of ad blocking, they are completely in their right to do so.

IIRC if something runs on your system, you have the right to mess with it, however you want — e.g. block specific parts of the site, or use reader mode etc.

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 7 points 22 hours ago

If youtube does that, I will stop using the site and wait for a workaround to be written. You could preload the videos and cut out the ads, for example.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 101 points 1 day ago (20 children)

I'm surprised more people aren't using uBlock Origin. It's an absolute necessity for browsing the web anymore.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I have YouTube Premium though not the Family variant and Google won't just fix their app. It is way behind NewPipe or YouTube ReVanced. No, I don't need shorts. No I don't need constant nudges to join groups of YouTubers by paying after I just paid you money, Google!

What I want is system wide quality setting (what exactly does High or Data Saver mean; would it kill you to give 480p, 720p or 1080p as options) or Sponserblock integration (okay, this thing is probably never gonna happen but still). YouTube 's app is a stinking pile of shit. I just use YouTube Music from them and will cancel/not renew my plan after it lapses.

[–] dillekant@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not a premium user but Youtube has poisoned its own waters with its algorithm. You can see the "top" content basically gaming that algorithm as well as it can. Literally every part of it from the title to the thumbnail to the content itself is hollow except for the skinner box.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

unpopular opinion: you can pay for premium and use Vanced/ReVanced because you value hosting infrastructure provided, and you understand that most of your money goes to the creators not google. And yet you still want control over the UI.

And you know what. If everyone actually did that instead of using Vanced for adblocking, it maybe still would've been alive.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 13 hours ago

No it wouldn't. They would have killed it anyway.
Also, way to blame the victims for getting abused.
"If only mommy would stop making daddy mad, then he would stop hitting mommy."

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 21 points 1 day ago

It's funny, because sponsorblock and vanced only exist because of youtube's greed. And now I can't imagine using their service without them, even if they rollback the annoying ads. And they can't implement them. It's really the problem they made for themselves.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Wait, people pay for that?

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I pay for YouTube premium because I like the idea of content creators getting paid when I watch their videos. I don't want to manually send each of them money or sign up for their channel memberships or anything. But if they make videos that I watch and they get a kickback? I'm fine with that.

I also have a YouTube channel that bring in a bit of beer money, so I use that to justify the cost.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] incognito08@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (10 children)

As I said in a previous post, people are afraid of pirating, so they prefer higher prices if it is a "safe" method.

I wouldn't call it pirating... More like... I receive the video, but the ads were unfortunately lost on the way....

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Or people actually earn enough not to give two flying fucks about 10$ a month and want to support their content creators and the platform that enables them.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I pay for that, because YouTube and YouTube Music is the main source of media for me And my family and I have no issue with paying for a service that I use a lot. And paying for that is so much easier then investing huge amounts of time into searching for and maintaining alternative Players and Tools for all the different devices where I (and my family) consume YouTube and YouTube Music. My limited time is more valuable for me then the price for the service.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I can understand if you want to pay. But don't say it's hard to block ads when all you need is uBlock origin installed... And that's it. It's literally a 15 seconds job for the rest of the life of your browser.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Remember that many people they don't consume YouTube primarily in a browser

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (6 children)

And how do I install uBlock origin into my living room television? How into the YouTube app on my Chromecast? Sure I could use Firefox on that but that will break any chance of sending YouTube videos from a phone to the Chromecast, so not really a valid option. How into the PS5? How install it into any kind of mobile apple device? How into all kinds of mobile YouTube music applications? Yes, it is easy when the only way to consume YouTube is via Webbrowser and even that gets more and more complicated whenever google changes something to block ad blockers.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] _spiffy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

This is the same for me and my family. It's such a great feature to have and worth not seeing ads. I feel like supporting the platforms I use is important to me.

[–] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

I pay for yt family premium and Netflix but use neither of them on a regular basis.

My nephews grew up with a pretty shitty life. They don't have a lot of fun things they can do in their situation. I figured the least I could do is give them YouTube music and some access to watch TV and movies on Netflix wherever they happen to be.

It's the same reason my steam family is chock full of games I'll never play.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (6 children)

A LOT of people pay for that. I was flabbergasted as well. Why would you pay for a free service? This feels like buying premium bottled tap water and they don't even bother to filter out the chlorine and the heavy metals.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

People buy diet water, so i don't think there is a limit to what people buy

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Why would you pay for a free service?

If it were a charity or non-profit that would be one thing. Google is doing fine without your support though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] style99@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

To be fair, this does add more to the pot for YouTube creators.

If you're a YouTube Premium member, you won't see ads, so we share your monthly membership fee with creators. Best of all, the more videos you watch from your favorite creators, the more money they make.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

YouTube has a transparent 70/30 revenue share model for creators.

Your entire premium subscription fee is split into 70 to creators and 30 to google.

The 70 are forwarded to the creators in proportion to the watch time.

in fact it's incorrect that "the more you watch, the more they earn". You can only watch two videos in one month and each of the creators will earn the respective 4$

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 9 points 1 day ago

So this has been true of YouTube Red since the beginning. It's one if the reasons I got it. But they use watch time as the way to divide your money out. It actually makes it extremely unfair split for people that make great but short content. It's also why longer content became more popular around that time and those 24/7 streams run like that.

Also why creators started doing channels of just padded run time content of like building legos and eating things. It's to secure better and funding.

The current setup is pretty busted and feels like the wheels are coming off again.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd rather just spend a fraction of the money on a Nebula subscription.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I mostly watch shitposts on YouTube anyway so Adblocker would do just fine

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 23 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I guess relatively few people still turn to piracy, it seems like all these streaming platforms are massively increasing their prices knowing that their customers will try to rationalise the extra spending somehow.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

They'll have to be taught a hard lesson. But realistically family was overly generous with a lot of folks essentially paying 2$/m for premium. You can definitely double this amount without many of them bothering to pirate.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›