this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
375 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

58312 readers
4371 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 108 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It’s very impressive that they got such a modern process up and running in such a relatively short period of time. I understand the Arizona location is relatively new.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, they're essentially doing trials where Arizona fab provides small amounts of sillicon that's being validated against what Taiwan fab does. While it was planned for 2024 I'm guessing everyone thought it would be delayed. It's quite a big win for US, they're on track to secure domestic supply of fairly modern chips in case shit hits the fan in Taiwan.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And they managed to do that with those lazy US workers? Wow.

E: folks, pls look up TSMC bosses' statements on American workers' ethic

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also, if interested, check out this documentary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Factory. Has a lot of interesting crosstalk between Chinese/American views on work and business.

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Such a sad documentary, especially the self sabotage union votes.

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I know. I was devastated when I first watched it, because I was so sure it was going to pass...

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thanks, Biden! And the American taxpayer!

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Maybe, but Intel operates there so the labour pool is probably quite skilled already. Perhaps good supply chains too.

[–] 0x0f@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 week ago

more domestic production is great

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is HORRIBLE! I'm a Patriotic Republican and don't know why it's Horrible Yet but Biden did it so it's BAD!!

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

He did it to support the rich libtards! Not the poor working Republicans can no longer afford guns to stop the immigrants. And he hates Tiaywan !

/S

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

We shouldn't be making water and energy intensive manufacturing in a hot desert.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bit by bit, Taiwan will be slowly sold off to China once they no longer hold the last thing that made them worthy of Western protection. Of course, there will be some harsh words of condemnation, but that's it. That's my theory. Sad but true.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the reason I'm rooting for everyone, including China, to do well with domestic chipmaking. Makes everyone have little less reason to try this modern day mutually assured destruction.

[–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

China: "this guys right, we are almost close to be our own chip manufacture and owning Taiwan."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anybody know if this has anything to do with Biden's Chips and Sciences program?

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes. So far, the CHIPS Act has resulted in $6.6b in direct funding and an additional $5b in available loans for the AZ facility.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cool. Thanks for the intel.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know what TSMC is. Figured it was a company.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not sure if you're serious, but they were making a joke because Intel, who makes chips, is a competitor to TMSC the chip manufacturer from the article.

So they played on that relationship by treating the word Intel in your "thanks for the Intel" comment as meaning the company.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No I meant intel, not Intel. Like 411. It was just coincidental.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

That's great but, honest question: why?

E: LOL downvotes for asking a question. Never change Lemmy.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because the U.S. government gave them $6.6 billion to do it under the CHIPS Act: https://www.reuters.com/technology/tsmc-wins-66-bln-us-subsidy-arizona-chip-production-2024-04-08/

With TSMC, it’s insurance against China invading Taiwan but Intel (and probably everyone else) got a load of subsidies too. After the chip shortage during the pandemic and Russia invading Ukraine, chip production became a national security issue.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

Mystery solved, I suppose!

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 week ago (11 children)

From a business perspective: more control over the manufacturing process and less risk of getting hit by tariffs

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Less risk of tariffs on China, less risk of supply chain disruptions like with the pandemic, takes advantage of incentives from the US government, and is something that is cool to advertise.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Multiple sources of production.

We learned during concentrating all of your production in one small country wasn't a good idea. Plus having multiple sources has always been suggested in case anything goes wrong with one company you can still have some production.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah that's been my least favourite experience with Lemmy.

Many replies are hostile and highly opinionated.

I don't have an answer for your question but it was a good question and it made me curious.

I'm in favour of domestic production but I would always want more information about it.

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Apple wants to cut down on counterfeiting. The US wants to prevent supply chain issues and reduce reliance on foreign chip production. The wiki article on the CHIPS Act is a pretty good overview: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHIPS_and_Science_Act

[–] PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Uhh. Who's counterfeiting a cpu that only basically 2 factories in the world can make? Functional fakes are a thing for some really basic chips but an apple arm cpu seems like a little much.

[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Perhaps unauthorized is a better word than counterfeit. The manufacturing process for CPUs often yields less than ideal chips. Perhaps they don't hit the clock speed they're supposed to, or maybe they consume too much power. Those chips are supposed to be discarded, but they often find their way to the black market. Sometimes those chips aren't even failures. If a fab overproduces, they're not just going to give Apple the extra chips. These are the things Apple worries about, and they view it as far less likely to happen if those chips are made in the US.

I should also point out that the CPU isn't the only chip that TSMC makes for Apple. Apple wants to make sure they're getting a cut of every replacement part that gets sold. You can't even swap screens on two brand new iPhones without Apple giving you a hard time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

We’ve spent the last few decades outsourcing key industries, where US no longer has as much manufacturing and we’re way too dependent on other countries. It took supply chain disruptions from COViD to realize how much of a bad idea that was.

We’re finally trying to recapture some of those key jobs, industries, supply chains, dependencies, starting with chips and renewable energy. THANKS, BIDEN! this is what will make America great again

[–] lustyargonian@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

N00b question. Do these chips get transferred from USA to India/Vietnam for assembly and then back again to all over the world for shipping?

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

They may. But logistically I can’t see it being a problem. Each CPU is like 10mmx10mmx1mm. You could fit a TON in a 1m^3 box.

[–] Threeme2189@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Ideally 100,000 if my math is correct. Just be careful as there is no packing material except for the box itself.

[–] lustyargonian@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Hmm. Perhaps we'd come to a point where these facilities are on all continents to reduce ecological impact, but I guess Apple isn't that green.

load more comments
view more: next ›