this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
458 points (98.3% liked)

Funny

6598 readers
1405 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
TheDude@sh.itjust.works
kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
example@reddthat.com
VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works
458
Get you a company that can do both (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/funny@sh.itjust.works
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago (1 children)

US Government Employee: "Okay, awesome. So that's a solid contract for the Lunar Lander for NASA. Great doing business with you."

Northrop Grumman salesman: "Yeah, sure, happy to help us win the space race against the Soviets!"

Gov Employee: "Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go figure out who we're going to get to build a stealth bomber for the Air Force."

Grumman: "Oh, we can do that too!"

Gov Employee: "Whoa, really? Thanks, that really makes the rest of the week easier. I appreciate it! Now all I need to do is find someone to make some cute little mail delivery trucks for the USPS."

Grumman: "You're not gonna believe this..."

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just to head off any pedantry: I know this isn't how it went, but it's funnier this way.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I believe the history is Grumman made the usps trucks and then a little while after, they merged with Northrup, to make Northrup Grumman.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_LLV

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, hence the disclaimer. Grumman delivered the Lunar Module in 1968, Grumman delivered the LLV in 1986, Northrup delivered the B-2 Spirit in 1987, and the companies combined in 1994.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You didn't pay any attention to their comment trying to head off your pedantry. Did you?

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The pedantry is genuinely interesting and contributes to the conversation. It's not like *it's or something that's pedantic for the sake of being pedantic.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago

I saw no pedantry, only interesting information.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's wild that they actually responded to the pedantry comment with the exact pedantry I was trying to pre-empt.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 30 points 1 week ago

So they make a variety of "delivery" vehicles...

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm gonna miss the old design. The new one looks like someone smashed it with a looney tunes hammer.

[–] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Looks aside, I'll bet visibility is incredible, at least from the front. And I think that at least my mail carrier will appreciate having air conditioning. We still have a lot of the old LLV's here and it was 105 and humid all summer.

[–] Corigan@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago

Functionally it's amazing. Totally with you.

Being able to stand in the back, low step deck, ac/heat! Visibility. And electric for the most part. our couriers deserve it.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

Being able to stand up inside the vehicle is another huge benefit. And a bunch of them are going to be electric.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, no doubt it's a significant upgrade, the old vehicle's silhouette is just really iconic to me.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

For context, this is the current design, the Grumman LLV:

And this is the new 2024 redesign, the Oshkosh NGDV:

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I never had a problem with the new, though admittedly goofy, design until I saw this picture. The ground clearance on that looks pretty low. Might just be photo angles tho. Anyone have any videos of these being tested out? Curious how they handle on dirt roads. I'm sure the did factor that into account, just curious is all.

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

New design is goofy but I kinda love it, it looks like a cartoon. Also it just screams functionality, the driver can see so much out of that massive windshield

[–] dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can it hit 45 without flipping over the bumper?

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Yes, but at 45 mph it starts playing the sound from Scooby Doo when Shaggy and Scooby start running away from the bad guy

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Old looks cheap to make, new looks cheap and safe to operate, shows, imo, a positive trend.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, the ones out there, so far, are reportedly a hit amongst mail carriers

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

I'm not surprised. I drive an EV as a delivery vehicle, and it's pretty much the perfect use case for an EV. No engine that needs to be idles while you are out making deliveries, and regenerative breaking is very useful due to the constant stop and go

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The old design looks like it was cobbled together by Elon Musk in his garage.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's the exact opposite of something Musk would make. Every aspect of the old LLV was designed to be used. Every aspect designed for longevity. If the steering wheels aren't coming off of the Tesla cars, the metal cover is coming off of the Cybertruck's footpedal.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I was mostly referring to the design mostly consisting of flat metal plates, something that hasn't been common in cars or even very sturdy, long-lived work vehicles, pretty much ever since the WW2 era of vehicle design (e.g. 1948 Unimog https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unimog )

[–] tauisgod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The old model was named the Long Life Vehicle (LLV) for a reason. Ugly for sure, but rock sold. Designed in an era when the main concern was to last 6 digits on the odometer, powered by the iron duke engine. Moderately efficient at the time of its design in the late 70s, but absolutely dependable.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is this why I never see my mailman anymore?

[–] sazey@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Maybe your radar needs an upgrade?

[–] pyrflie@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

Northrop Grumman facilitating all your delivery needs.

[–] KellysNokia@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I guess we doin ... now meme

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have no idea why they sent me a thermonuclear device, I ordered an Xbox controller

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The OG Xbox controller can be used as a thermonuclear device if you drop it.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

how fuckin high you gotta drop it from

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

About tree fiddy leagues

A league being about tree fiddy miles.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The controller is just an off the shelf cost saver they use to control the drone with the bomb!

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 1 week ago

No wonder I never see, hear or detect the mail carrier on radar.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

They just copied SAAB.

They tried to give away a SAAB made anti-tank weapon with each vehicle purchase in the US in the 80s and 90s to bolster sales, but were told "that's not a responsible reaction to road rage."

[–] enkille@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Truly a post apocalyptic company

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

"awe man, I'm on the mail truck line again"

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

"you get what you pay for"