this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
104 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39050 readers
1827 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former BBC news anchor Huw Edwards, once one of the most prominent media figures in Britain, was given a suspended prison sentence Monday for images of child sexual abuse on his phone.

Edwards, 63, pleaded guilty in Westminster Magistrates’ Court in July to three counts of making indecent images of children, a charge related to photos sent to him on the WhatsApp messaging service by a man convicted of distributing images of child sex abuse.

Edwards’ fall from grace over the past year has caused turmoil for the BBC after it was revealed the publicly funded broadcaster paid him about 200,000 pounds ($263,000) for five months of his salary after he had been arrested in November while on leave. The BBC has asked him to pay it back.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 35 points 2 months ago (4 children)

A 1 year suspended sentence for having hundreds of CP pics on his phone? That's just ridiculously low.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not sure where you got "hundreds" from. It was 40 that were sent to him by someone else. Plus a bunch of other stuff which wasn't of minors (but obviously age isn't the only criteria for legally or morality, so I'm unsure if the rest was "legit").

He got into trouble because they were offered and whilst he initially declined them, he later changed his mind and accepted them (by saying "go on" after being offered again later on), knowing full well what they were.

And that's where he crossed the line.

He had a great job and reputation over decades of work on TV. Then he goes and does that and destroys everything. Not his smartest move, for sure.

[–] Bassman27@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

True, but that's not the point. It'd clearly be unrealistic to equate the crime to things like rape or murder.

The man's obviously sick in the head but at least didn't attack a child irl.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Just plutocracies, doing plutocratic things, because they're plutocracies.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The sentence was a custodial jail sentence. There were just two mitigating factors that downgraded it to a suspended one by a whisker: 1. early guilty plea (in the UK this reduces sentence by a third) and 2. first offense. Typically a first offense under two years would be suspended for anyone.

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Six months!

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 17 points 2 months ago

BBC protecting the nonce since 1963

[–] Bassman27@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Rich peados getting away with it as usual. The judge and the bbc should be ashamed of themselves..

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People who experience shame don't act that way.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

That's why he said they should be

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It's pretty standard to have a first offense under 2 years suspended

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I knew him for that funny technical difficulties scene. I had no idea he did THAT.

I hate him now.