this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
659 points (99.1% liked)

Work Reform

10003 readers
146 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 74 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Company-wide email: "We had our best year EVER and it's all thanks to YOU!"

Me: "Great. Can I have a raise?"

"Oh, we can't afford THAT."

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago

Every fiscal year end when they announce their profits, like clockwork.

[–] Humana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I once worked in a division of ~3500 employees, every year the division produced two profit forecasts one called "pessimistic" and another called "optimistic". My first year the division made $335 million MORE than the optimistic forecast so the division CEO approved every employee a $335 bonus.

The next year it happened again but only $285 million, so $285 bonuses that year.

Both times I scoffed and quietly pointed out to the delighted Boomers I trusted that it was less than one third of a percent of the total money.

The next year apparently the corporate office found out, fired said CEO and quashed the bonuses forever. Apparently the distribution of the crumbs was more than they could handle.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't just form the union, make it work for you. You don't just form a union and magically everything gets better with no more effort on your part. You have to be active and determined otherwise the union just becomes another bureaucratic mess looking to use you for their own gain.

[–] orb360@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

That's when you form a union inside your union... Which the union will then try to stop...

It's unions all the way down 🐢

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 27 points 2 months ago

Humiliation and cruelty aren't by-products, they are the point, for those who can't enjoy lunch unless the other guy gets none.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 9 points 2 months ago

Meanwhile, one of the 3 guys at work is working nights and weekends for free. He's salary. I keep telling him to go outside and live life. Stop giving everything away to the owners. He doesn't listen. He thinks he's going to save the company. I'm like buddy if those extra hours are all that's between success and failure, the company's fucked. That's flu away from disaster. He doesn't listen.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a control thing. Second Though channel has a good video about this same topic.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Most of Second Thought videos are alright. But always keep in mind he's been groomed by Hakim, the tankie and genocide denier.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

I'll keep that in mind. Thank you

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago

At this point, skip asking for a raise and go straight to forming a union. It saves time. It implies they should have been taking care of the workforce in the first place. And your colleagues likely need raises too.

Then over demand, because they'll try to offer less. If they try any technical or procedual shenanigans, show they've been caught and double your demands.

Remind them that unions and strikes are the peaceful alternative to violent retribution, and by trying to block unionization they are admitting they'd rather a class war.

If law enforcement gets involved, tell the state that siding with the owners will only escalate thr conflict, and extend the precarity out to the rest of the economy. Stock values will totally tank, and legislators and gubernators will be held personally responsible by their shareholding plutocratic masters.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 months ago

"You gotta go down. There ain't no union."
-- California State Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil, probably.