As if im going to be relying on source non-havers in an apocalypse. True apocalypse I'm dying because no way in hell I want to survive just to suffer and meet a grizzly death (e.g. from radiation, zombies, etc.). Something recoverable I'm fine, got my food, water and electricity sorted out. Also a backup copy of wikipedia :•)

[–] shani66@ani.social 1 points 2 months ago

Honestly, with a copy of Wikipedia you could probably restart civilization pretty well.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Right to left

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There is no hope to be effectively saved by an unsourced saviour, specially during apocalypse…

[–] QuentinQuiver@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

Only science needs sources. Maths doesn't

[–] QuentinQuiver@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

The "source" is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true.

Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.