this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
197 points (96.7% liked)

196

16504 readers
3756 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

From Inkya Gyaru Demo Ikigaritai!

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Don't tell me shit if you can't back it up! I don't want to hear things, I want to know things!

[–] jjagaimo@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

As if im going to be relying on source non-havers in an apocalypse. True apocalypse I'm dying because no way in hell I want to survive just to suffer and meet a grizzly death (e.g. from radiation, zombies, etc.). Something recoverable I'm fine, got my food, water and electricity sorted out. Also a backup copy of wikipedia :•)

[–] shani66@ani.social 1 points 2 months ago

Honestly, with a copy of Wikipedia you could probably restart civilization pretty well.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Right to left

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There is no hope to be effectively saved by an unsourced saviour, specially during apocalypse…

[–] QuentinQuiver@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

Only science needs sources. Maths doesn't

[–] QuentinQuiver@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

The "source" is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true.

Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.