this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
198 points (90.6% liked)

politics

18850 readers
4867 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 105 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, this is really like a tiny dog barking its head off, because it's convinced it can't be harmed.
Russia and Putin have been embarrassing themselves for a while now.

[–] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 98 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

suuure, they couldn't even take out ukraines communication systems

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Cutting a couple undersea fiber cables and completely fucking the whole internet is very easy. Humanity has so far just kinda silently agreed to not fuck with that.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Sure, but welcome to 2024, where we have mirrors and cdns and the cloud with distributed everything.

Not saying disconnecting the americas from eurasia wouldn't be a big deal, but the internet would keep working.

Elon would be very happy.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Im curious… how much undersea cable traffic could Starlink handle? I know the sat-sat laser links are just coming online now, what if every sat had them

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 74 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Maybe they could get an compromised/friendly/useful idiot/individual installed in the hightest levels of government who, either intentionally or unintentionally, would funnel secrets to them which help facilitate mass disruption?

ohh wait...

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (28 children)

I find the threat of GPS loss to be hard to believe. Theyd have to take out 38 GPS satelites and presumably any of the other navagation satellites American allies have in orbit, and presumably theyd have to not damage their own navigation satelites in the process. I also doubt they could do that all at the same time, or quick enough that no one could respond. Im sure they have the capability, and im sure they have an idea of what the operation would have to look like but in terms of a plan that's actionable, I have big doubts.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss that threat.

They know exactly where in the sky they are. They know what frequencies their antennas are tuned to. I'm betting burning out those transceivers would not be an impossible feat.

I also don't know how well they put up against really large lasers

They've also been fully capable of putting s*** into space for years. I would not put it past them to have some form of combination weather/spy satellite and weapons platform out there.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

They must be aware of the concept of re-ta-lia-tion. You shoot down my satellites, I shoot down yours. Nobody wins and we are all back 40 years.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Yeah?

And we'd retaliate. Which is why they haven't done it. They didn't shoot down the satellites in the cold war and they aren't going to do it now unless they've decided the world without satellites is just so much better.

How is this news? China could nuke the West Coast tomorrow and the Canadians might invade Maine to secure a maple syrup monopoly! Actually, that's more likely than anything else in this thread...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago

Russia said they'd take over Ukraine in three days.

Russia says a lot of shit.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

Russia has become the embarrassing relative you hate seeing at holiday gatherings.

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How would they interfere with our elections without the Internet?

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

The same Russia that "indicated" the Ukraine special operation would take three days?

Lol

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

that's basically russia asking to get wiped out

[–] mods_mum@lemmy.today 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No one takes them seriously, they just bark. Here's a hilarious wiki article on all the red lines Russia set in the past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_lines_in_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Date notified: February 24, 2022

Red line: “Interference” in Ukraine by outside powers

Date broken: February 24, 2022

This one send me flying.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 23 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

What? The whole fuckin internet is the backup plan

Like bro do you even BGP?

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Like bro do you even BGP?

BGP works under assumption that everyone involved acts in good faith and that good faith can be, and in specific cases in history was, severely abused.

So it is likely it will be part of the problem.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BGP_hijacking

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

So Ivan Sabotageovich calls up someone who works at Level3

Says "Hey broski I want you to start announcing bogus BGP routes"

Guy who answers the phone says "What? Why would I do that?"

Guy on the phone says "I'll give you rubles"

Guy who answers the phone says my brother in Christ I make $175k per year and I will get fired and they'll fix it in about 25 minutes anyway, sorting out and fixing stuff like this is kind of why people like me are employed here and there are a lot of us watching what happens

Guy on the phone says I can also give you TONS of unrefined crude oil and methane, or precision aircraft parts from the 1990s

Guy who answers says I need to go now, good luck though

Guy on the phone says blyat as the line goes dead

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] infernalaanger@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Russia couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The internet was literally created by the DoD to have a communication system that was resilient to foreign attacks. If one part of it goes down, it can still work with the parts that aren't down. This is built into the design.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Nope. Usually this claim includes some reference to nuclear war, but the Internet was not designed to withstand attack. Arpanet was not designed with military applications primarily in mind.

https://www.internetmythen.de/en/index0258.html?mythen=myth-15-the-internet-was-invented-by-the-pentagon-and-designed-to-survive-a-nuclear-attack

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Russia continuing to signal why it's a good idea to take them out. Thanks, Russia!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They’re afraid to use their glide bombs in Kursk because they’re not accurate enough to avoid hitting their own friendlies and they think they can hit a satellite moving ten of thousand + miles an hour in orbit!? lol

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

For real. People talking like Russia is going to jam GPS or something, while they can’t even jam GPS or RF well enough to prevent FPV drones from slamming in to their own people. I just saw a video of a Ukrainian FPV drone taking out a Russian EW platform that’s purpose built to counter drones for fucks sake.

Edit - oh. This statement was from Medvedev back in June. lol ok bro. How you gonna run those sub generators you need to fuck with those cables when all your diesel is currently burning off in a fucking epic conflagration? Your country is literally cooked rn.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

"We could totally fuck you up if we wanted."

"Go ahead and do it then."

"..."

"I'm waiting."

"...I do not want to."

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

In the Julia Roberts move "Leave the World Behind", they mention a process of destroying a country. (I vaguely recall that the process was attributed to a real person.) One of the steps was to take down the internet. With lack of information chaos develops, and the country destroys itself.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i feel like taking down the internet is harder than it sounds. you could easily disrupt satellite, but the world will route around this... its actually designed for it.

they would have to poison dns or major routing points somehow.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 10 points 2 weeks ago

Just imagine the outrage if Russia is the reason that tiktok goes down

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

That's hilarious bro this putin guy needs his own stand up special he's probably got a million of these

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The Russians talk shit everyday. It ends up that it's either something that they can't technically do, as it is here, or something that would would result in having their ass handed to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›