this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
139 points (95.4% liked)

Movies

7419 readers
387 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Well, I finally watched this movie yesterday, with 0 expectations and I actually enjoyed it. I'm surprised to learn it jas >90% score on Rotten Tomatoes as I wouldn't rate it that high, but I found it very compelling; I was actually looking forward to how they would come out of those bad situations this time. Characters were strangely well developed with backstory that didn't make my eyes roll. Sure, not original, but well told. I was expecting a Netflix movie type (dull and somewhat boring) and ended up with a good pic. Hoping for a sequel.

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 82 points 2 months ago (1 children)

100% on rotten tomato doesn't mean a movie is 10/10. Just that people would recommend it. And it definitely is a very solid movie. I also like the fact that there's a friendship between a man and a woman without any romantic tension, very rare to see.

[–] Blackthorn@programming.dev 34 points 2 months ago

Yes, that's actually pretty rare in Hollywood: an actual friendship between a man and a woman, without having to jump the other.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 49 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sequel would be awesome. I once saw someone suggest the sequel should be same actors but playing different characters as a new campaign and I really really hope they do that (though unlikely)

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They’ll never do that. What D&D needs for “maximum monetisation” is “franchise” and “strong character IP”. They need these characters to sell you more stuff.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Whatever it takes to get more Sophia Lillis on the screen

[–] illi@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Oh I know. Woul be awesome though

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately a sequel seems unlikely. The film wasn't a box office success, despite being a better film than most other movies released that year.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I know. Frownie face indeed. I paid to see it at the theater opening weekend, and I was very pleased with what I saw. Even my wife who doesn't enjoy D&D enjoyed the movie. She does enjoy fantasy though, but don't most people?

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like this one as well. Part of the reason I think this movie just works is because it doesn't even try to be a gritty realistic action thriller adventure movie, but rather it instead combines larger-than-life, over the top action with a healthy dose of wise cracking, levity, and failures...just like an actual RPG session. It's fun to watch but not mentally and emotionally exhausting like, say...a war movie.

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think another key aspect is it didn't try and make the source material the joke. Too often these kinds of movies wouldn't understand the source material and would try and poke fun at it instead. Like a wink to all the "normies" watching for cheap laughs in place of actual comedic writing.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They did poke fun at lots of D&D stuff (I guess more at how people play D&D), but for the benefit of the players who understood the references. They didn't go so deep as to lose the non-players interests though. A great balancing act. The subtle breaking of the fourth wall without actually going all the way was excellent.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Exactly. D&D nerds were in on the joke rather than being the butt of it, while it was still accessible enough for normies.

[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Same - watched it a month or so ago and actually enjoyed it more than I expected. My wife was watching with me, and even though she doesn't even know what D&D is, she quite liked it too!

We would both definitely watch a sequel, if it's ever made.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I loved how accessible and entertaining it was, even for people who didn't catch all of the in-jokes and references.

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think the best easter egg is that they all follow initiative when attacking 😎

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

My favorite was the party from the cartoon in the arena.

[–] SecretSauces@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait, really?! I didn't catch that one

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Yup, and each sequence is 6 seconds long!

[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 4 points 2 months ago

That's a great way to put it - the movie really is accessible, isn't it? A lot of Easter eggs for people familiar with D&D, but it's still quite enjoyable even when you know nothing about it.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm glad people are still discovering this movie. It has the potential to be a cult classic imo. No, it's nothing groundbreaking, but it's a fun time, and breezy enough that it will probably enter my repertoire of feel-good movies I can just throw on the background to feel better, along with movies like The Princess Bride or Stardust.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can click on the tomatometer and get the average score from the critics they index.

The "Top Critics" are averaging 7/10 for DnD:HAT

[–] Blackthorn@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

Still impressive!

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

FWIW the RT scores are a percentage of reviewers that were generally positive vs negative reviews. 90% could be a pretty good movie because nearly everyone enjoyed it. That doesn't mean it was the greatest movie they had ever seen. An objectively great movie might have more detractors for some reason and end up with a lower percentage, even if most people agree it was a better movie.

That said, DnD was pretty great.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If only Jarnathan had something to say about this...

[–] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

We should probably wait for him...

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

It's a great movie! Now watch it again and remember it's D&D. Soooo much of the movie plays out like a campaign. For example, the battle sequences at the end play out over 6 second intervals. You can see where a concentration roll was missed and the statue freezes. You can see when they miss their important rolls and fuck up their plans. The scene in the graveyard when they're asking questions, the risen dead start out with heavy in-character accents, but they're just talking in a regular modern voice by the end, just like a DM would probably do in a home game. There are so many amazing Easter eggs throughout the entire movie. You can tell that it was created by people who actually know and love D&D.

Edit: fun fact. The scene where Zenk leaves the party and Chris Pine is talking about him walking straight over the rock was completely ad-libbed. But it was so perfect, they left it in.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago

Speaking of Zenk, he's clearly a DMPC that was introduced because the DM was annoyed by the players derailing the plot.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As a DM I can totally imagine having to pull stuff out of my ass when they rode the cube down to the under belly of the area lol

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Ooh! Ooh! They reached the max capacity of a gelatinous cube when they pulled that stunt. One more person and it wouldn't work!

[–] Blackthorn@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hadn't realized these things! That's pretty cool.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Another Easter egg is that you can see the party from the original D&D cartoon that was popular in the 1980's in the background when they're in the labyrinth.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago

I was surprised by how much I liked it as well. I ended up watching it on 3 occasions with a few of members of my D&D group at a time. All the little mechanics they managed to incorporate into the action is great and it really captures the tone of a D&D adventure well.

[–] Phenomephrene@thebrainbin.org 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Excellent movie. A great one to sail the seas to find. Hasbro can still eat it for that horse hockey they tried pulling with the OGL. I haven't forgotten; I won't forget.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

This is one that I paid to see in the theater, and paid to own, because I'd like to see another one made.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Such a shame, because Hasbro's OGL tomfoolery happened right before the movie came out, and I think a lot of people skipped the movie (or at least weren't as enthused about it) because of that.

[–] texasspacejoey@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago

I LOVED this movie. It was so much better than i ever expected it to be. I might just rewatch it again this week.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I liked it as well. The opening is great. It subverts expectations in the same way a lot of D&D campaigns do. Missing judge will be a co-conspirator, maybe in disguise? Nope, just a bird.

[–] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

"But we've already approved your pardon!"

10/10, no notes.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 7 points 2 months ago

Rotten tomatoes isn't a direct quality rating, it is a percentage of reviewers who rated it favorably overall. So if everyone gave it a 7/10 it would be 100% on RT. I personally find that to be more accurate than trying to average exact rankings, especially since they have separate critic and audience ratings which helps when critics tend to dislike certain movies.

D&D: HAT was just a fun time, which is why most people that saw it rated it favorably. A big part was not being ashamed of the source material, which is what tended to drag down superhero movies prior to the MCU taking off.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

I saw it in theater with my best friend, who is also my longest standing player im ttrpg games. We went twice

That may not seem signficant without backstory.

I'm disabled, with my primary chronic pain source being my sciatic nerve. So, driving to a theater to see a movie is painful. Every bump hurts, and I live in a rural town. Sitting in the best theater seats good a hour is constant pain to some degree or another.

Doing that twice for the same movie is something I haven't done since before my back went to hell, before 2005. An hour long drive to the theater, then the hour and a half of the movie, plus walking through the parking lot left me sweating and almost crying by the time I got home after the first time.

And I still went a second time with my wife, my best friend, and his husband.

Obviously, people value things differently, and me going through that doesn't mean the movie is some kind perfect thing that everyone would and should enjoy as much as we did. But if you're a d&d fan, and/or if you like fantasy action movies, and you don't at least watch it once, you're missing out on what may be the best example of that genre in recent history.

It's at least on par with action fantasy like Willow, and that's pretty much the best example of that genre.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago

It was just a really fun movie. I can't really think of anything it did particularly poorly.

Would love a sequel as well!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One of the best original fantasy movies we've had in a long time. (Original as in it's not a sequel or reboot.) It really pisses me off that we'll probably not get a sequel.

[–] austinfloyd@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 months ago

In an attempt to mimic D&D more closely, all follow up movies will be cancelled due to scheduling conflicts.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 months ago

I thought this movie crushed. Really fun watch that captured D&D well.