this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
144 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

10340 readers
3195 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 month ago

On OGLE-TR-56b it only rains ironically

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not one of these is "men."

I'm starting to think that song was a lie!

:P

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What kind of umbrella would be required in each world?

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Earth - any water repellant fabric, probably synthetic

Venus - I'd go with Teflon and extend it to the ground

Titan - SCBA

Neptune and HD 189733b - something hard and durable but lightweight. I'd go with titanium. Chainmaille extending to the ground.

OGLE-TR-56b - tungsten, with a mobile support apparatus.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Earth needs a bit more than fabric sometimes. Not only can that water fall in the solid phase, occasionally it moves really fast!

A SCBA isn't an umbrella. The rain is just more conductive atmosphere though, so you'd need a higher setting on your personal heater.

Neptune probably doesn't have ground, and HD 189733b definitely doesn't. Anything capable of surviving the pressure at that depth would probably be fine, although we don't know how large the diamonds would be or how sharp the flakes that form are. Diamond Shuriken Rain sounds like an awesome song though.

OGLE-TR-56b also probably doesn't have any ground, but depending on how high you're flying you might want something non-stick. Tons of iron welding itself to you is possibly the worst case of wing-icing you can find in nature.

[–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

@ininewcrow@lemmy.ca Asking the right questions

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want to feel the nice warmth of molten iron on my shoulders. Give me that amazing summer glow only OGLE-TR-56b can provide

[–] Tiltinyall@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago

Why wait? There are foundry positions open everywhere.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Funny thing is that there'd be enough diamonds that even the market crash of hauling a shitload of them back to earth wouldn't stop you from making absolute bank off selling them.

Probably mostly to scientists and specialist mining companies but hey money's money.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

Diamonds aren't actually rare, and the people who control the market would have you executed.

[–] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Jevon's principle would save your ass

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

okay. so. like... given that "diamond" is a particularly defined cyrstalline form of carbon. Does neptune rain solid diamond? wouldn't that be more like.... 'hail'?

also. it's always fun to me reading some older scifi where they colonize venus because it looked like... how we look at mars today.

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I read old scifi where Venus was full of rainforests. That's not how we see Mars today

[–] LordTrychon@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There was a young adult sci fi series by Asimov called 'Lucky Starr' and I remember Venus was Oceanic in that one. Old old series.

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All we could see were clouds implying rain (forests), or even more (and only) water.

[–] LordTrychon@startrek.website 3 points 1 month ago

Yep. I found it fascinating. I think the version I had probably had a forward from Asimov talking about how we were wrong about guesses about Venus.

I don't remember much else from the story except this, and the big reveal of the whodunnit. (Or more accurately the how).

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do you define rain on a gas giant?

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The same way you define rain in a cloud, when it condenses and falls. Of course diamonds would be hail, not rain.

[–] Hule@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

"condensed carbon". It might work..

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah there aren't any slaves to exploit on other planets, so they aren't interested

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, and we've never transported slaves to a new world on ships before.

[–] Rustywhims@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder what diamonds created in a gas giant atmosphere look like. Neptune has crazy high wind speeds.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Why are scientists absolutely terrible at naming planets?

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's like in No Man's Sky where you start out giving thoughtful names to every planet you come across, but after about twenty systems you're running into similar world types and color schemes that evoke the same names you've already used, so you just stop giving a shit and stick with the names the planets are generated with.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I guess that's a good point.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are approximately two metric shit tons of planets. I assume scientists have better things to do with their time than to sit around and think of names to give to every single one of those.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I just assumed all the ones we would actually hear about would get named more regularly. But I guess if they're talking about a specific one, this would happen. I never really thought about how many must really be out there, but now it seems obvious.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They ran out of Greek gods.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

naw. they just stopped naming the children after the first couple rounds of olympians.

why name them when there's a few hundred a month? breed like rabbits, Olympians. probably out of boredom.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I know that Olympians fuck like rabbits, but they only meet up once every four years. Can't be that massive of a population increase.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You really think Zeus is gonna have that long of a dry spell? Never mind Aphrodite or Dionysus?

I bet Hera is a closet freak, too. (Zeus just doesn't like the whips.)

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

From what I can tell, they've all had a several thousand years dry spell. Haven't seen those guys around in a long time.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Assuming they started off as two of them 2000 years ago and Fibonacci was right about rabbit breeding habits (and Olympians mature in 4 years time and don't menopause before the age of 2000). We'd have 139423224561697880139724382870407283950070256587697307264108962948325571622863290691557658876222521294125 (500th element of the Fibonacci sequence (2000 years / 4 years = 500 Olympian breeding seasons). There'd be plenty of them to name planets after.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

They do have rules, they're not completely pulling these names out of their arses

[–] Whatevster@lemmy.today -1 points 1 month ago