this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
192 points (97.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9717 readers
1042 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 57 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Kill the billionaires who horde homes.

Ban, and jail, participation in price fixing systems that most people use, especially apartments, to price their product.

Kill the billionaires.

Put caps on resell values of 5% per year to stop flippers.

Again, kill the billionaires.

Set maximum rent increases to 5%.

Kill the… etc.

[–] ____@infosec.pub 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Billionaires and rent-seeking companies. There are at least three national companies I can think of who are hoarding single-family homes in major cities and renting them out.

Generally they purchase at scale via REO scenarios, and provide no value whatsoever while driving up prices drastically

One example is a company called “Progress,” no better or worse than the others but with a meaningful web presence if you’re curious.

[–] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Also Black Rock.

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 4 points 3 months ago

Maybe we should progress on Progress.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Kill the billionaires who horde homes.

It isn't the billionaires, it is the funds the billionaires and multimillionaires invest in. I have seen these funds buy under-privileged neighborhoods almost in their entirety in less than a year. They replace the cabinets with builder grade stuff they buy in bulk, same with the carpet, a few.light fixtures and a coat of paint (maybe $5k investment) and they rent them out to working families. A neighborhood goes from ghetto to starter within two years, but rents go from ~$800 to ~$2200 as well. Also, those homes will never be within reach for anyone looking to purchase.

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 5 points 3 months ago

Well, of billionaires who invested in these funds found themselves with fewer fingers, they might reconsider their investments.

[–] spaghetti_hitchens@kbin.run 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I actually think we need to cap rent increases to about 2%. In a little over 14 years, your rent doubles at 5%. So $2.5k/mo becomes $5k/month- $60k/year! Since wages have largely stagnated, most renters would be in an even worse place (although definitely better than 10% increases).

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 2 points 3 months ago

I’m down for 2% 😁

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Whatever happened to public housing? City governments should start getting into the development business and light a fire under these greedy mfs with $200,000 starter condos.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I wish we had social housing like in Vienna

https://youtu.be/41VJudBdYXY

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Unfortunately city gov’t always reasons that the public money will be better spent if developers front the cost of building, but the developers aren’t building the kind of housing that houses the populations that need it (and in the Bay Area many of these luxury towers have very low occupancy). I wish my tax money would go directly to building affordable and dignified housing that would be managed by a public trust or similar.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

People rag on NYC's projects and claim that they're proof that council housing will always be terrible, but built correctly, affordable housing can be both desirable and yet still profitable for the council.

The key is to spend a little money to make it nice, plant some trees, hire some security guards, and build some respectable communal space that people actually want to be in. Good public transportation links are also important.

In Hong Kong, all blocks of flats built by the Housing Authority will usually have one security guard on duty 24/7. They become a fixture of the community. Of course, Hong Kong public housing projects tend to be 30-storey high rises with hundreds of units each, but one 24/7 security guard per group of buildings should be enough; it's more about the perception of security than anything.

Then charge $700 a month in rent or sell the units for $200,000. Even better—set up financing through a publicly-owned non-profit financial institution or a credit union for potential homebuyers. Reinvest profits to build more. It's a virtuous cycle.

I guarantee there'll be waiting lists three miles long.

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Most places it's severely defunded or mismanaged. In my town the waiting list is extremely long, housing was limited for years before the recent housing crisis and for some reason they don't even follow the list of people they have waiting, they skip around. There's public and section 8 housing that sits vacant for months or years even though the list of applicants is a mile long.

[–] pelletbucket@lemm.ee 24 points 3 months ago
[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

A starter home isn't just "the cheapest thing in a given market." Some neighborhoods aren't starter home markets.

You can't say "It's a starter in Malibu" or "That's starter home prices in downtown Manhattan." Neither of those locations have starter homes in them.

That said, abolish NIMBYs but let's be real, no one can afford a "Starter" in those places because they aren't Starter locales.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Also nearly 1/3rd of all homes in the USA are purchased with cash, no financing.