You can donate books to the library, you know. They're always looking for more copies of popular books and what they don't add to their collection, they'll resell them and use the money for more books.
Paper books aren't "waste" by any means as they are easily recycled.
Most authors I've heard from (through their Internet posts) don't mind libraries, but they'd rather you enjoy their books legitimately than pirate.
It might not be legal, but in my book, it is perfectly ethical to pirate a copy without DRM if you already own a legitimate copy (paper or DRM-inclusive)
I would be astonished if publishers figured out a way to put DRM on a paper copy of a book.
Here's a DRM-free copy for sale:
It'll look like this:
Once you buy this, it is truly yours. Nobody can take it away from you. You don't have to agree to any EULA to read it. No account needed, no activation, no sign-up. You can even resell your copy if you want. There are no technical restrictions on it whatsoever. You can enjoy it any time of day, anywhere in the world, and there's no need for an Internet connection.
Don't do that. Authors make next to nothing from their books. You don't have to support Amazon, but at least buy a paper copy or audiobook to support the author.
Unless it's J. K. Rowling. Fuck Rowling.
Betting market odds are 2 to 1 against Trump debating Harris again
🐔.
If you don't like Vim, you should stop being a milk-drinking sweetroll-eating WUSS
Valve has enough lawyer money to keep Microsoft at bay.
This puts competitive pressure on Microsoft. Valve's goal is to turn Steam OS into a legitimate competitor to Windows for gamers, and Microsoft should fear Valve's success.
Right now, Microsoft has no legitimate competitors in the PC gaming space. They are free to do anything they want to their OS and consumers have no choice but to tolerate it. If Microsoft say "watch these adverts", consumers open their eyes. If Microsoft says "pay up", they reach for their wallets. If Microsoft says "suck", they kneel.
If a competitor arises to Windows, then Microsoft will have to actually start worrying about losing customers to Steam OS. More importantly, every customer who switches to Steam OS is one who isn't paying for Game Pass and one who isn't buying games from the Microsoft Store and paying Microsoft their 30%.
Valve is not well meaning. No large for-profit company is ever well-meaning. It's merely the case that Valve's best interest happens to align with those of the consumer, and they have decided that their business model is going to be to win over consumers' loyalty through goodwill rather than milking them for every penny they can get. And they are very successful at this, seeing that there has still not arisen any serious competitor to Steam. That's entirely because consumers are loyal to the platform. Valve provides a good service, consumers reward them with loyalty. It's not friendship, but it's symbiotic, which is as close as you can get to friendship in the harsh world of business.
I don't think Google "taking a page" out of the Apple playbook is quite the right analogy. It's more like both companies were reading the same book to begin with—tight control over a market means you can extract more value out of it without needing to worry about competition.
Before someone asks why there isn't insane inflation from banks printing an infinite amount of money for themselves, the Hong Kong dollar is pegged to the US dollar. In order to be allowed to print HKD, banks must have an equivalent amount of USD on deposit.
It didn't say "e-book" when I originally wrote the reply