this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
8 points (78.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

29339 readers
910 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If anything, cannabis seems like a much better (and more profitable) drug around which to build a leisurely establishment.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RagingHungryPanda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

that's just a "coffee" shop in Netherlands

[–] lwuy9v5@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There are some board game cafes in the states. And some of those overlap with legal weed :) but smoking indoors in public is still a no-go

[–] Kalamazooligan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as you don't stink. So fucking sick of weed users smelling like ass in public.

[–] Solo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I'm sick of alcohol users smelling like ass. If you don't drink then the smell of alcohol on someone's breath is absolutely nauseating.

[–] Pat12@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The difference is you can't taste other people's alcohol but you can smell others' smoke

Right but you can consume cannabis in tons of different ways - cookies, cocktails, etc. Restaurants had smoking areas for decades with far worse air filtration systems.

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Dry vaporizers (with temperature below 200C, convection-based) don't have smoke so are a lot less offensive with smell, if not odorless particularly with access to fresh air.

Also people smelling of alcohol, particularly if they are drunk or drinking liquor, is definitely a thing. Also barfing. I wouldn't doubt bars having bad smells sometimes.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

People who are going to a place to smoke typically wouldn’t mind that. Take cigar or vape lounges, for instance. Also it’s usually people who don’t smoke weed who act like the smell of weed bothers them.

[–] Pat12@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

right but my point is if a group of friends want to go to a bar and some people don't smoke or like the smell of smoke then there is a problem, it's not like they can just opt not to smell smoke

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Then don’t go to a weed bar, I guess. Laws are unlikely to allow weed and alcohol in the same place any time soon… though that already happens illegally at concerts and many bars I’ve been to. But people at the bars usually smoke outside. Colorado gov’t acts like all hell would break loose if people smoke and drink at the same time.

[–] JickleMithers@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...that's why you would only go to a place like that if everyone is down. Having them for people that want to go is fine, no one is forced to go.

[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds nice in theory, but in reality the result is usually that if the majority of a group smokes, the nonsmokers don't have much of a choice except for looking for new friends. That was a very common complaint when smoking in pubs and restaurants was still legal here.

[–] JickleMithers@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Just because one person doesn't want to go to something doesn't mean they shouldn't exist. You're basically saying one person's opinion/choice outweighs an entire group. If those choices constantly put you at odds with the group it might be best to find a group that aligns with your values more. There's also nothing wrong with being friends with the people that want to go to things you don't like, just tag along when they do things you do like. You also don't have to have one set of friends, you can have multiple groups that like to do different things. I'm not pro banning things for the sake of others that can choose not to participate.

[–] Noggindrill@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

there are THC drinks where I live, always a nice option for me to have at gatherings as a non-alcohol person.

[–] dystop@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Edibles might make it better. But then you'll need to give people something to do for an hour or so before it kicks in...

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You mean like eating, playing board games, and socializing?

[–] query@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they replaced individual bars rather than expanded the space where drug consumption is the basis of socializing.

[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t smoke weed, but phrasing it’s usage as “drug consumption” always annoyed me. It makes it sound like it’s the same thing as heroin or meth, which it’s not even close to the same thing.

[–] query@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the same thing as alcohol.

[–] swordfish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From what I recall weed is considered less harmful and addictive than alcohol. Most recent study that caught my eye was from New Zealand. Alcohol was somewhere on the top along with heroin. THC somewhere in the middle ranks.

[–] query@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, alcohol is pretty bad. But I've been disappointed when looking up places to hang out, so many of them are some kind of bar. I'm fine with people using drugs on their own time, but I'd like for there to also be places where people don't.

[–] Q6xs@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is quite common in The Netherlands. They're called coffeeshops.

[–] callcc@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

They are usually not very cozy though since they are barely legal and they don't want to get too much attention.

[–] justhach@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Its hard to justify it for the same reasons we can't have Shisha bars and smoking lounges (at least where I live): 2nd hand smoke.

I can, as a non drinker, go to a bar and have myself a soda, and leave there as sober as when I walked in. If I do that in a room where everyone is smoking up, I will get high from the second hand smoke whether I want to for not.

I mean, why not just have a general social club with coffee/food, games, etc, and just step outside for a puff?

[–] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The smoke issue has been solved. I've been to cigar lounges that do not smell outside and barely smell inside, despite over a dozen people smoking sotgies in there. Massive HVAC systems and filters handle it all.

Cannabis can be edible and here in Milwaukee we're already seeing farm bill delta9 show up in bars and restaurants.

[–] zepheriths@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The issue is that a lot of people that smoke weed in place would reak. I don't think many people would enjoy the smell

[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] zarp86@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Consumables only. Problem solved.

[–] souperk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your dealers home: Am I a joke to you?

[–] CoderKat@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Dealer? What's a dealer? Is that something I'm too Canadian to understand?

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it wouldn't. I'm sick and tired of the childish argument that if we accept alcohol then we have to accept or introduce other substance abuses because some find it more appealing.

[–] Solo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why shouldn't we accept it? Its already poven to be better for you than alcohol, many people enjoy it, and a lot less deaths per year will be caused by wee than alcohol. Should people who don't want to drink not be allowed to have a place they can hang out similar to a bar?

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here we go again. People who don't want to drink alcohol can hang anywhere and still don't drink acohol. The unwillingness to drink alcohol or that "many people like it" are not actual arguments to introduce and use other health damaging substances rerdless of their nature and effects.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just want constancy. Weed is less dangerous than alcohol. Ban both, legalize both, legalize weed but not alcohol, or keep things the way they are and drop the premise that it has anything to do with health and safety.

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

That "less dangerous" is so subjective and unfounded that I'm not going to address.

On the other hand do you think it's a good idea to think in extremes? Alcohol is rooted in our culture since literally thousands of years to get it out is almost impossible now but we can struggle for moderation. Weed as we find it on the market didn't even exist 100 years ago. So maybe it's a good idea to introduce it get it common as alcohol so in 50 years we will have the problems with alcohol and with weed on top. Smart.

Then we can go further to other drugs because we cant leave them outside. We have to be consistent and some people really like it.