this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
241 points (99.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5194 readers
566 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 56 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It's always about money isn't it?

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Only way to make people change their ways, if it hurts the bottom line then action is usually taken.

This is why government regulation should be harsher, and fines should be proportional to company income.

If the fine is too low it just becomes the cost of doing business.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Only way to make ~~people~~ the rich change their ways

Most people will stop doing something if you show them how it hurts others. Not so the wealthy and powerful.

Being rich actually causes neurological changes, reducing your capacity for empathy and making your brain look more like someone born with psychopathy. 'Power Corrupts' is a biological fact. To be powerful is to be more capable of evil.

[–] mynachmadarch@kbin.social 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Does being rich cause neurological changes, or do those with those neurological traits by and large try to become wealthy?

Just curious the actual science there. I agree to be that rich shows a lack of empathy one way or another.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] NathanUp@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Libertarian Socialists have been saying this for a century now.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 5 points 5 months ago

I don't get much into doctrinal differences, but I feel like this is pretty core to a lot of anarchist thought. I vaguely recall a quote from engels, something about anarchists believing you need to abolish heirarchy in order to abolish injustice, vs socialists believing vice versa. I think neuroscience shows that power differentials will always create human misery.

[–] mynachmadarch@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for taking the time to list links!

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago
[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

I've though about this a lot. I suspect evolution tilts a little towards psycopathy when wealthy.

Hard to say if theres a mechanism for that encoded in DNA, but if there is, Im betting it would get naturally selected for.

If an individual is in a position of power, then being a self-entitled asshole rapist will reduce competition and increase the spread of genes... Especially if the individual is a male

Assuming this has a negative effect of society, cultural evolution would hopefully respond with counters to this... Which I think is what we see time and again all over the world.

Society gets living situations relatively reliable. Assholes rise making things worse, society either crumbles into weakness or rejects new situation and removes assholes, encodes new ethics into societal norms and works towards gettingliiving situations reliable, repeat.

When more people are fed abd housed, theres more resources to devote towards economic and war engines, so I think this makes asshole removal naturally selected for on a cultural level.

This loop seems to be getting more frequent and I'd love if we could skip the parts where folks are miserable and dying.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

I think it's the whole capitalist system that enables and rewards people with sociopathic traits. Which is why they are more successful in this system.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Which is weird, because doing nothing is only going to cost more and more as time goes on.

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Well yeah, but have you thought about how doing something might impact profits this quarter? Unacceptable!

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

New acronym just dropped.

NIMQE - Not in my quarterly earnings! Pronounced Nimquee

Example usage: The CEO, upon receiving word of a new bill that would drastically help reduce carbon emissions but also create a temporary negative pressure on their multinational's earnings per share, pulled a suitcase full of cash from their file cabinet and walked out the door, calling up the governor to arrage a round of golf where they would declare NIMQE.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Exactly. It's about short term profits only.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 2 points 5 months ago

It might cost more overall but it will be different people paying that cost (taxpayers and poor, mostly) whereas if we took action now it would be the capitalists paying for it.

[–] PixellatedDave@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

It all makes perfect sense Expressed in dollars and cents Pounds shillings and pence Can't you see It all makes perfect sense

  • Roger Waters
[–] rimu@piefed.social 30 points 5 months ago (2 children)

A 3C temperature increase will cause “precipitous declines in output, capital and consumption that exceed 50% by 2100”

Remember this is a global average. There will be places with a 100% decline.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Cause no one will be left to consume anything.

[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago

And, most importantly, -200% decline

[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And oil companies are still bribing politicians to make things even worse so they can make more money. At what point do we take over the evil companies to stop them from destroying the planet we all live on?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 5 months ago

Oh geez, that's so far beyond vile, I have no words.

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 9 points 5 months ago

As I've always said, climate protection is economy protection. In the long run especially.

But those fucks in charge are too short-sighted and narrow-minded.

Short term profits are more important than long term financial survival. Or, in case of our climate, even survival at all.

[–] anarchist@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Oh no not the gross domestic product!!

Ironically one of the ways to fight climate crisis would be degrowth, which involves not caring about such things as the GDP

[–] rothaine@beehaw.org 6 points 5 months ago

Shhh if we tell them it hurts GDP, billionaires might start actually paying attention

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 5 months ago

Six times and 12% is a massive understatement of what's going to happen

Absolutely massive

[–] Pilgrim@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

So much winning! We're setting all kinds of records and world firsts!

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Hear me out for a moment:
We can solve a big chunk of this. Politicians want to be elected, so they do what the people want. Under capitalism, every receipt is a ballot paper. Our shopping, toys and short vacations are only possible through exploitation and destruction. If we understand this, we can make different choices and simply let things be. We change our minds, we stop doing it! That's harder than moaning about politics, the economy and the system on the internet, because you really have to change something about yourself. Paying more money for products that are also available cheaply. But as long as we remain greedy, spoiled bargain hunters, nothing will change around us.
Bonus points if you talk about it and go protest.

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
  • Join an initiative at your workplace, neighborhood or start one yourself
  • Join a group that engages in activism
  • Vote for the most ambitious climate candidates at all levels over the next 10 years
  • Buy everything used, second hand
  • Switch to green energy providers
  • Insulate your home
  • Eat less meat and more plant-based foods
  • Shift your banking and investments to benefit the environment
  • Switch to public transportation, bike or electric car
  • Stop flying