this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
45 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

11 readers
1 users here now

Discuss Games, Hardware and News on PC Gaming **Discord** https://discord.gg/4bxJgkY **Mastodon** https://cupoftea.social **Donate** https://ko-fi.com/cupofteasocial **Wiki** https://www.pcgamingwiki.com

founded 1 year ago
 

"We went from hero to zero pretty fast."

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Enttropy@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh, shut the fuck up CDPR.

Besides the ocean of technical issues that are mostly fixed now, the game is not even a tenth of what Mike Pondsmith and CDPR drooled and parroted the whole decade prior to its release.

It’s a beautiful looking FPS with enormous production values, PS2 era AI, no joke Vice City has a more lively world, and it has Assassin’s Creed Valhalla’s depth for it’s "RPG" systems. Even when you accept the puddle deep experience and try to like it for what it is, the game gives a huge "fuck you" with how offensively quick the game ends.

As someone who loves the CP TTRPG and was an idiot to trust Pondsmith and CDPR, hating on C2077 was something that came from inside me.

[–] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It really annoys me how companies started leaned into blaming "haters" for any kind of criticism. Especially considering how quickly some people turn on whoever says anything critical of something they are hyped for.

[–] hoilst@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It wasn't really meant to be a game, it turns out. It was just a Hype Delivery Vehicle.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

YangYe sold out so hard for it... then it came out and it was broken. what a fucking clown.

[–] hoilst@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The bugs were the best thing to happen to that game.

Why? Because it distracted every insufferable zoomer and stole all the oxygen away from the completely lacklustre gameplay, narrative, and design.

[–] DpwnShift@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Man, I hate when companies play the victim and try to tell us why we did/didn't like something. I wasn't following a fad, I was reacting naturally!

You're allowed to rush out an incomplete game, destroy your reputation, and lie to your users; none of that is illegal. But I'm allowed to not like your game, vocally, and stop buying your products in the future...

[–] bushOfBerries@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah. If they can literally pay for thousands of Ads saying the game is "X", why is it rude for us to claim (as a single individual) that is was not so.

[–] BettyWhiteInHD@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Thing is they do it because it works most of the time. Most gamers have the memory of a goldfish and they'll read that statement and go "yeah I guess it wasn't that bad" and keep giving people that constantly lie to them money. That's unfortunately how it is.

[–] 0xSim@fedia.io 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

lmao that game was so bad they removed it from Playstation's online store, but yeah I guess "it wasn't that bad"

Edit: here's "not that bad" according to CDPR: https://nitter.lacontrevoie.fr/gautoz/status/1407006269047771151#m

[–] wryan@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

It blows my mind so many gaming podcasts I listen to glossed over that when it happened. Like, it was so freaking bad they removed the game from the store, inhibiting anyone from purchasing it digitally. And everyone in the industry covered it like it was just any other bad, poorly launched game. No, it was extremely bad; truly broken in myriad of ways.

[–] PlasticExistence@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

It bears repeating that the game was removed from the PS store because no other game had ever been handled that way.

[–] asparagus_p@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, the "it wasn't that bad" line is a quote from the journalist, not CDPR. What the VP of PR actually said is ""I actually believe Cyberpunk on launch was way better than it was received." His point probably being that the game wasn't as unplayable as the uproar would suggest if you played it on specific platforms. Obviously it was very bad on old-gen. The hate train was definitely as big as the hype train, both of which were ridiculous.

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

What? I had it on PC, and there were enough bugs in that it frankly was unplayable. The reception wasn't just a matter of "oh it has issues on PS4", come on, and it was absolutely deserved.

[–] Atarian@vlemmy.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it wouldn't run on older hardware.

[–] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The thing is that the "older hardware" in question included the then current consoles the game was advertised and released for.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Oh, to hell with anyone who has an attitude like this guy. Consumers stating their displeasure about an overhyped, incomplete game IS a “cool thing”. Taking advantage of consumers, and then framing yourself as a victim, IS NOT a “cool thing”.

The FTC needs to get on this. Promising something awesome, then selling a buggy, broken mess, should not be the norm.

[–] Whirlgirl9@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

hmmm it's almost as if releasing an incomplete/broken game is bad for business/reputation and seems to cause a tough row to hoe to gain back gamer's trust... weird.

[–] ClassyDave@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Insert Principal Chalmers it's not me meme.

[–] WondrousFairy@lemmy.fmhy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

Epic bullshit. Hacking was missing, cyberspace was omitted completely, essentially half the content in a typical Pondsmith game was just not present. And most of the quests in the game just ended abruptly, indicating they were cut short.

CDPR, nobody is buying your bullshit. Just suck it up and move on and BE BETTER. Be like you used to be.

[–] lp0101@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

As someone who never followed the marketing material and had a high end PC: I was expecting Witcher 3 in Night City, and that's exactly what I got

I understand that plenty of people were disappointed by the missing features and the stuff they outright lied about, but I had fun with it. Probably a 7.5/10 at launch for me.

[–] 1bluepixel@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

I understand that the game had a troubled launch, and that's a super-relevant criticism of the game as it was when it came out. But the sky-high expectations fans put on CDPR are largely self-inflicted. It's not like this is the first game with questionable marketing decisions or pre-rendered trailers selling a fantasy the game never comes close to fulfilling.

If you just go "Hey, a CDPR game set in a cyberpunk future, let's check it out," it's by and large a fantastic game.

[–] BettyWhiteInHD@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

and the stuff they outright lied about

That was the part that killed my trust in the company, they lied about so much! And they kept lying with the video embargo, they didn't let reviewers use their own footage if the review came out before the game did. That's such a huge breach of trust. And that's not even accounting for the fact that the game was literally unplayable on PS4.

The game was fine and playable on PC albeit with a ton of weird glitches and broken systems, but I don't think I can give them a single dollar of my money going forward. I can't justify giving people like that my hard earned money.

[–] entropicshart@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Agreed - bought it for PC and loved it.

[–] HelixDab@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I got it on PS4 as a gift, about a month after it came out. The biggest problem I had was that my PS4 wouldn't read the disc from the factory because it was dirty (???), and that I had to immediately update it. I didn't play the TTRPG, but I've played TTRPGs similar to Cyberpunk. I have enjoyed it immensely. I put it down before finishing it, because I maxed out my level, and even though there was still a ton of storyline and random quests, there was no more advancement. That was kind of a bummer, but that was the only reason I put it down. (Well, that and I've generally lost interest in video games.)

I'd put it at a solid 9 when I first got to play it; I didn't experience any game-breaking bugs, just some annoying things. I very much enjoyed the experience. I understand people being frustrated that they didn't have a solid netrunner experience, but that didn't bother me all that much.

Kinda wanted to see if I could go cyberpsycho though...

[–] eVexRa4@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I bought it a few days after the release, so I new what I was getting into.

Still enjoyed it but I'd agree that it's maybe a 7/10 at best even ignoring the bugs. Good writing on a lot of the quests though.

[–] hoilst@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I was expecting Witcher 3 in Night City,

So was I, and it was nothing like the Witcher III. It sucked. Dull missions, one-dimensional characters, no atmosphere.

I guess we know all the people who made WIII took their severance and ran.

[–] Ski@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

I definitely followed all of the marketing and was expecting about 3 or 4 more skill trees, more meaningful choices in side quests, and generally a more living world. Plus like, 20 hours of gameplay that got cut out and turned into a cutscene.

[–] InduperatorRex@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Honestly, I'd say I actually enjoyed cyberpunk more because of the public backlash, because I had such low expectations that when I borrowed it off a mate - I was blown away by how fantastic it actually was

[–] CorrodedCranium@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If the Phantom Liberty update does the same, I'm hopeful it'll be the expansive sendoff that Blood and Wine was for The Witcher 3."

It's interesting to see them mention the Witcher 3 considering that also had a messy launch and it's fair share of bugs.

[–] TraceLines@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

And now is remembered as one of the best of the genre. One can only hope for such a thing to happen again with Cyberpunk 2077. :D

[–] HelixDab@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'd heard that they're redoing the first one. Hopefully that's true, because I was never able to get it to run well on my PC. And when Witcher 2 came out, it was XBox and PC, and I'd switched to PS. :/

[–] Liontigerwings@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

well he's not 100 wrong. But also, they are 100% to blame themselves for that. They took advantage of the goodwill they earned with Witcher 3 and went out of their way to hide the last get versions of the game because they knew it sucked.

[–] Tashlan@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, then why did CDPR apologize for it?

https://www.engadget.com/cyberpunk-2077-apology-video-roadmap-updates-2021-220043550.html

Shit I can't stand -- people fucking up, apologizing for it, and then later insisting they didn't fuck up. People plead guilty to shit in court then try to retcon it. People who write essays about their behavior and then later say they didn't do it. This shit here. They fucked up, they said they fucked up. The followup for this shit needs to be: Were you lying then or now?

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ehh, I'd say they are maybe 20% right about that one, the gaming community just piled on top of it like it was the most irredeemable pile of trash ever.

The thing is the other 80% of that story is them telling upfront lies about the game, them intentionally hiding that it was literally unplayable on consoles, and even now years after its launch after numerous updates and bugfixes the game is still just a shadow of what it could have been.

It's a fun good game but the thing I think about most while playing it is usually about missed potential, "damn this could have been so much better". Maybe Phantom Liberty and the free update improves this, I really hope it does, but the game is a mess of gameplay mechanics, terrible progression loops and empty open world.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

the gaming community just piled on top of it like it was the most irredeemable pile of trash ever

The past gen versions were so bad that they got pulled from digital storefronts. Literally unplayable. They knew this, as evidenced by not a single reviewer getting an advance copy for those systems. They knew and they happily took consumer's money.

Pretty trash, imho.

[–] FlashZordon@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

No, it was pretty bad. I was the moron that bought it for PS4. It performed EXTREMELY bad. Refunded immediately.

Marketing machine hyped this game up beyond belief and i bought into it.

I came back to it on PC and after all of it's patches up to the path tracing update and it works much better now. Played through the story and it's pretty good but we'll see if the phantom liberty expansion ACTUALLY revamps what they say it will.

Once again it's a lot of big promises.

[–] Raji_Lev@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

So now we're on the "Blame anybody and everybody BUT ourselves" stage. Lovely. <s>Because OF COURSE the consumers are wrong to be unhappy about misleading-to-outright-false marketing selling them a product that didn't actually exist outside of the marketing pages (like a game that was playable on XB1/PS4. ZING!)</s>

Hype culture needs to die in a fire. Preferably one fueled by all the cash that's going to the marketing departments.

[–] MajaMystic256@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

it was a terrible launch
but the game is better nowadays, I want to play it sometime

[–] cheeseonto45t@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Game sucks balls