So that's why his mask doesn't cover his mouth.
this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
238 points (97.2% liked)
Today I Learned (TIL)
6544 readers
3 users here now
You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?
/c/til is a community for any true knowledge that you would like to share, regardless of topic or of source.
Share your knowledge and experience!
Rules
- Information must be true
- Follow site rules
- No, you don't have to have literally learned the fact today
- Posts must be about something you learned
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It used to, but worn off with friction.
The chin section spontaneously combusted as a result of the furious head he was giving.
Lol.
Hero's definitely do give cunnilingus. Every time.
🫡
Every time.
Every Now AND Then.
Both before and after penetration
I always knew I was a villain.
... said no woman ever
to abide by certain rules governing character behavior in order to protect the franchise and consumer products sales.
TIL that superheroes are also obligated to fight against 4rth wall problems
Yes?
In this case it's corporate being especially protective of Batman, and terrified of anything that might affect toy sales (among other things). IIRC Justice League unlimited had quite a few episodes shot down or rewritten because of various Batman related edicts from on high. And parental backlash after Batman Returns is part of why we got Joel Schumacher. Hell, it's how we got Robin and the no killing rule, because they wanted to make the comics more marketable to kids.
Shit on the other side of the 4th wall is often the biggest problem superheroes face, and not just through censorship. It's why Spider-Man made a deal with the devil. And it's why Arkham has a revolving door, since popular and marketable villains need to keep coming back (which is why the "Batman should kill people" argument is idiotic, as any villain that won't stay in jail will also refuse to stay dead).
These are corporate owned characters. The company in charge is going to care far more about making money and protecting their brand than they will about art, consistency, or even whether their policies are rational. Hell, they canceled a Green Lantern show that was popular and successful because they weren't happy with the fucking toy sales.
And it's why Arkham has a revolving door, since popular and marketable villains need to keep coming back
Also the fault of the stupid comic code that required the bad guy to lose by the end of the issue.
thanks for this great insight!
the only thing i knew related with toy sales are ewoks.
green lantern, being a popular show, definitely scaled up the money factor.
This is the deleted picture Zack Snyder had posted. Does anyone know what comic it is from? Edit: Looks like Snyder's tweet is the only source. https://www.vice.com/en/article/akg75k/did-zack-snyder-draw-a-picture-of-batman-going-down-on-catwoman-an-investigation
NSFW
To be honest, that doesnt look all that comfortable, rooftop (dirty ground), batsuit (bulletproof? so I guess its hard?).
Well cats will lay on literally anything and look comfortable and batman is a slut for being miserable so I think it'll be fine
Everyone always brings up stuff like that but in the moment no one would care. Endorphins are pumping emotions are on fire and they already wanna fuck each other.
It happens.
And presumably they've been fighting crime all night in those suits so they're likely quite sweaty and dirty. And it's Gotham dirt. Catwoman's going to wake up with a UTI.
Batman has a utility belt. Do you think he doesn't have something to freshen up his breath or wipe down his face after getting sprayed with all sorts of shit.
Really seals in the flavor
Looks like Miller's Batman
Exactly what I was thinking except "That looks exactly like Fatbat"
Batman looks like my cat when it's about to pounce at the toy
“As sure as I am that he fucks bats, I know he doesn’t go down on women” - DC, probably
Seriously, I know the creators had to fight for the commissioner Gordon storyline, but how did they not allow this given all the other stuff in that show?? Show runners were spot on with the selfish lover comment.
That’s not what DCs mom said.
Ah yes, a true hero
spoiler
resurrects his dead parents into florahuman abominations.
Sure as shit isn't my headcanon
“A true hero penetrates.”
Edit: Put it in quotes so that you can tell that this is meant as satire.
Balls deep. No wait, even the balls are going in.
Just passing by to say it's a great show
This is the best summary I could come up with:
In a rather surprising revelation, the co-creator of the R-rated Harley Quinn animated series told Variety that DC blocked the inclusion of a scene from the upcoming third season of the show where Batman was going to perform oral sex on Catwoman.
“In this third season of Harley [coming to HBO Max] we had a moment where Batman was going down on Catwoman,” Justin Halpern said.
Superhero content creators are generally expected to abide by certain rules governing character behavior in order to protect the franchise and consumer products sales.
DC is at least open to the idea of expressing a romantic side to its characters whereas rival Marvel is considered extremely chaste.
In this week’s episode of The Hollywood Reporter’s ‘TV’s Top 5’ podcast, Loki writer Michael Waldron was asked about Marvel’s prudishness and whether the character Vision even has genitals.
“It’s the biggest piece of entertainment in the world right now that encompasses such a large spectrum of fans and age ranges when you get into sexuality.
The original article contains 465 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!