Of course, 'sharenting' is a word.
this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
298 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy Guides
16749 readers
3 users here now
In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.
This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.
You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:
Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!
Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!
This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.
Moderation Rules:
- We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
- This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
- No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
- Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
- Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
- Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
- News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
- Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
- No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
- No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
- Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
- General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.
Additional Resources:
- EFF: Surveillance Self-Defense
- Consumer Reports Security Planner
- Jonah Aragon (YouTube)
- r/Privacy
- Big Ass Data Broker Opt-Out List
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I definitely read "sharting" at first glance
believe it or not, right to jail, right away.
A right to jail bad parents as other citizens observe them would probably do a lot to change parenting.
There'd be hardly any parents left if you could jail bad parents on whim based on a singular observation.
Then many of those kids would be even worse off...
Thinking back to the very "concerned parents" of my childhood, they were usually the over protective lunatics
Well, note how I didn't say it would improve parenting.
Lol! Touché
Unfortunately, "common sense" isn't common.
It would still have to be for something against the law, not just any random old complaint...
Ya'll out here wholly forgetting how rights are actually stripped from people...
load more comments
(1 replies)
I just read an onion article and thought this was another one.
Good!
It’s super creepy and disgusting how some parents use their children as props for social media “content” 🤮
Ruby whatever her name was comes to mind.
This is really important imo. Kids grow up predisposed to stupid oversharing of their private life. It cripples their ability to experiment and make mistakes if they have to fear being exposed to a giant audience.
I remember reading something about how gen Z, the first generation that had social media from early childhood, are more avoidant in making big life decisions than previous generations due to the sensitivity to publicly making a mistake.
Risk aversion is good for many things, but a lot of the best life experiences/accomplishments you can have require taking a leap at some point.
If you fell on your face before the camera phone. Your 2 friends laughed at you. Nowadays the whole school laughes at the video of you for a week or more. I am not at all suprised that young people are risk avoidant. I feel so very priveleged that I grew up in the slim timeframe while the internet was new and exciting and made modem warbling noises. And not now in the time when we are permanently connected, and absolutly everything on the internet is trying to exploit you, and have a team of psycoanalysts to make it most effective on you.
a lot of the best life experiences/accomplishments you can have require taking a leap at some point.
For sure, im not even a parent yet but this stuff is so complicated to deal with
I tell you what, I said a lot of things as a child that I would vehemently disagree with today. If I had to be branded with that staining my image for life, I don't think I could deal with the shame.
It's like a panopticon, but purely mental and inbuilt since their first memories.
This will lead to some heinous things down the line, probably started by those who by some luck of the draw weren't exposed to the panopticon.
Also some parents just don't know any better.
A friend used to routinely post about her children on Facebook and other SM, until someone claiming to be a grandmother tried to pick up one of her children from school. Fortunately, the school had safeguards in place and followed protocol. All those posts and pictures were deleted immediately.
Its so sad that stuff like this needs to happen before people wake up. The kids dont deserve failures like this as parents.
She was a decent enough, but doting mom. She was proud of her kids and thought the whole world should be blessed with their antics. It wasn't attention seeking or income generating. She just had a blind spot, assuming that because she wouldn't dream of doing that, no one else would. And it is sad, to me, that she was robbed if that innocence in a very visceral way; but she did learn a valuable lesson and never forgot it, either
I think we need to agree to disagree here. Being a parent in this world is (depending on your social status) a dangerous project that asks for a lot of responsibility.
A billion things can happen and it can kill, maim, traumatize or change your kid forever. I know because I have been one of those kids who grew up under „naive“ parents. Its hell. Life is hell afterwards.
So this is definitely triggering for me and I‘m not gonna give in to my instincts here since nobody deserves to go through what I went through. Suffice it to say that naive parents are not fit to be parents imo.
Most people are not fit to be parents.
IMO the problem is that we expect at most 2 people to share the responsibilities of parenting, when we should be sharing that responsibility across like 20 people or even more.
The idea of one or two people solely raising a child is insane, for most of human history children have been collectively raised by the tribe/village.
We're not solitary predators god damnit, we're one of the most social species on this planet! If even cats share the responsibility of raising children whenever they're able to, it should be pretty clear that we're not made to raise them on our own either.
I'm sorry for your experience, and do hope you find the healing to alleviate triggers. I wish you all the best on your journey.
Thank you very much!
load more comments
(2 replies)
Just wait until you hear about all the ways parents used to also fail their children.
Technological literacy is ideal, but lacking it is hardly a failure of character.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Sharenting.
Close relation with Sharting
I would go for shit parenting
The Shartening
I wonder what they consider oversharing. Where exactly is that line?
The first article will require parents to officially declare the use of their children's image online to the Italian Communications Regulatory Authority (AGCOM). If a direct profit is gained from these activities, parents will have to transfer the money to a bank account in the child's name, which will be accessible to the child after they turn 18 years old.
Interesting because I think most family channels do it for money now, though as part of a college fund may work. If you have multiple kids and parents in a video how will it be divied up?
We don't really need college founds in Italy, the fee for a middle class family is around 2k a year
That for 4 years and living expense ain't nothing.
Sure, but nothing close to 60k a year
Thought sharenting meant split custody situations, was confused. Am a little high.
That’s a good idea. Think I’m gonna get high myself
How'd it go
Pretty great. I munched a brownie, made pancakes and watched a movie.
Same. And I wasn't even high.
Yhe fuk is sharenting
I was confused as well, so I went out of my way to find this article which explains it.
From the article:
sharenting—a contraction between share and *parenting, *that indicates the practice of oversharing content portraying children on social media platforms.
It's a portmanteau really - unless this is another American English difference.
I'd rather see them put a lot of effort into educating folks instead. If they're well educated about how everything works, this issue, and others in the future, would be addressed.
The parents are already "burned" and wont change from some info campaign. The abuse starts before school or even kindergarden age so there is no chance to educate the victims.
As someone who's always hated being publicized, yes pls.
view more: next ›