this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
189 points (87.1% liked)

Not The Onion

11828 readers
227 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jedibob5@lemmy.world 114 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (11 children)

You know, years ago, I used to really like Neil before he adopted this "Well, ackchually..." shtick over scientific inaccuracies in works of fiction. I find him absolutely insufferable now. It's the same kind of brainworms as CinemaSins.

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 61 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 24 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Physics teaches you can model reality with math.

If you get really good at anything, there’s a natural temptation to use that skill outside of its proper context.

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

I know, buddy… I know.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago

If you get really good at anything, there’s a natural temptation to use that skill outside of its proper context.

Indeed! It explains a lot of the issues in many fields, today. A bunch of us computer programmers got really good at that, and now it's still illegal to shoot us for it (for now). /s (mostly...)

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Phychohistory is feasible, we just need to scale up!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 48 points 6 months ago (7 children)

This motherfucker watched a movie where a girl inherits all of the memories of her 4 most recent female ancestors because her mother used drugs while she was pregnant and he's like "that isn't how sound moves through sand"

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I think that Neil doesn’t understand something very vital about being a science educator which if there is one thing people know about them, it’s that they are smart as hell and whether that is actually true or not the science educator must adopt a self-deprecating, disarming character to be relatable to the audience within the context they are in because of it.

You can’t play the character of a king and be relatable if people perceive you as actually being a king outside the context of the play….

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Similar story. I liked him a lot, read one of his books, and started listening to his podcast. But the more I listened, the less I liked him.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 9 points 6 months ago

I really, really liked his podcast when the co-hosts rotated, including Kristen Schall and Eugene Merman. Then it became Chuck Nice all the time, and I didn't stick around to see if it ever changed back.

[–] Splatterphace@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Ah yes, loved CinemaSins, ruined how I watch movies, then became too annoying to watch.

OH GOD THE BELLS

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

CinemaSins is far too often just them not understanding the damn point of a scene or movie.

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

That's a weird way to spell "intentionally misunderstanding the point because people arguing about it in the comments drives engagement and is therefore more profitable."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] philycheeze@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

That one tweet about the stars in Titanic was the only good one of those.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 99 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 57 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I want Neil to give a scientific explanation for Leto II (2) turning himself into a sandworm.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I need that meme where he talks about kissing himself in the mirror

[–] chetradley@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Tweets need to go away period. what a piece of shit content model and platform. Having a very short character limit was never the genius move people thought it was

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Originally it was a technical necessity since Twitter had to work via SMS which has a limit of 160 characters. The enforced brevity was part of it's original charm IMHO.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HorriblePerson@feddit.nl 48 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That man's pedantry is truly beyond parody.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I think it's just his form of boomer humor. Like he slaps his brain knee. At least it's weird and not like malicious.

[–] drislands@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Ehhhh sometimes it goes too far. I remember one time he commented after a mass shooting that, uhm ackshually the flu kills more people than mass shootings so why are you all upset? It was pretty offensive.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn't call it offensive. It's factual. It is insensitive. It's not thinking of those that died and their families.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago (6 children)

"Somebody didn't do the research on that," Tyson told the talk show host, making the case that if you pound your fist into a sand dune, it wouldn't actually produce a thumping sound the way it does in the film. "You can't thump sand."

Oh, this is easy. Neil, the thumping isn't for the sand its for the spice in the sand which is a near-magical substance that is tied biologically to the sandworms and when consumed by humans in large quantities lets you see into the future. Are you going to try and tell me a substance which clearly grants its user the ability to see through space-time can't be excited mechanically with thumping it on the ground?

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 39 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Actually it does work with regular sand dunes. The sequential baked layers creates a reasoning champer that amplifies sound at certain frequencies.

https://youtu.be/v29ou094luc

Which means Neil is actually upset with how much scientific world building Frank Herbert did, since it confuses people like him who haven't studied sand dunes for decades.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Besides the sand worms can pick up on the vibrations. It doesn’t need to be loud. Just be a consistent pattern.

So having the thump sound is there for artistic purposes. For the art. In a medium used for art.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Well, it's more than that. I think this is even mentioned in the new movies, but there's a phenomenon in Dune called "drum sand" that is a section of sand that somehow amplifies vibrations. Obviously it doesn't matter how any of this works. It's a story where, if you get high enough, you can predict possible futures. No shit it isn't realistic. No one cares.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Neil failed to remember that they are on Arrakis, not in the Mojave desert.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 39 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The original book finds itself in a science fiction genre only because anything with spaceships and technology is placed there. For all practical purposes though, it’s a space fantasy.

In other words, complaining about science of Dune is like complaining about poetic meter of a tax report - something you do only with the closest of friends.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 20 points 6 months ago

There's also a lot in there about how a planet's ecology influences culture. Also the long term effects of banning computers. Also about how in the far future people will forget about Earth but some cultural artifacts will remain even when people have forgotten why they do things. Also about how over enough time, people may change so much they may not even be recognizable as human. Also how with the existence of FTL travel it may become impossible to escape the killer robots people will inevitably build unless someone turns themself into a worm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BURN@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago (5 children)

NdGT is a pretentious twat who needs to just shut up and sit down.

I swear the only time he’s relevant is when he’s bitching about some science fiction movie not being 100% accurate

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So, you're saying he should...pound sand?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Movie: "Y'all check out these space wizards who can pilot big space ships at FTL. Check out these giant worms that shit magic dust. Check out a Special Boy who can see the future."

NDT: "None of this is scientifically accurate."

I swear the only time he’s relevant is when he’s bitching about some science fiction movie not being 100% accurate

Taking an ice-pick to "Contact" because it isn't realistic, and posting it in Tyson's DMs every day until he deletes his account.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] N_Crow@leminal.space 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Science fiction not science facts. When was the book written again? And why is an Astrophysicist giving opinions on worm biology? Not his area of expertise?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The specific thing he's bitching about is sand physics, that is that sand doesn't really 'thump'.

This is something that is actually specifically addressed in the book, I'm not sure about the movie; short version is that the sand and weather on Arrakis are weird, and the sand forms more solid areas than elsewhere.

So not only is he complaining about a minor (from a realism perspective, it's important in-universe) detail, he's also showing that he did not read the book

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago

Professional "That guy" has "That guy" take. Shocking

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 23 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Personally it was the behemoth worms and psychic mind readers that made me think it wasn't a documentary, but YMMV

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] IamLazersword@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 months ago (3 children)

So I guess transcribing a YouTube video and providing a weak opinion on what was said is considered journalism these days? This is such a low effort article.

I watched the interview and it seems like more of a comedy bit than Neil's actual opinion of the movie overall. Some people just want something to get upset over I guess...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Neil DeAss Wipeson

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

To be fair, he did this in Colbert’s show, which was kinda done in jest/humor. Having said that, the guy does like to “ackchually” stuff a lot, even for fictitious things. And he definitely was his usual smug self even though it was a comedy bit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Person who's only job is science and who is an expert on science comments about the science of things and people find a way to complain about it.

Let the man die on his silly hills. It's funny and harmless. Pull the damn stick out. Perhaps go pound sand.

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

My bitch with him is he’ll say the most stoner ass thing in the most smug way possible like it’s some insight from god.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VulKendov@reddthat.com 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I feel like people take these way too seriously, like some of these comments sound like it's personal. Its just a movie/book series if some one wants to poke some fun then just let em.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›