this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
66 points (65.0% liked)

Technology

59467 readers
4510 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why would something like Google search possibly be irrelevant?

well..

a lot of these search engines use search engine Optimization, seo to rank sites. It's also not secret that they choose what shows up and what does not.

Things like that have been a thing for years, and since there wasn't a good alternative search engines remained relevant as we users tolerated their direction.

Now you have Lemmy, Mastodon, Sharkey, Firefish (if it's still a thing) connected to the Fediverse. On the Fediverse there is no such thing as looking up a website, but rather you look up actual specific content and get real results handed back to you. A lot of these Federated services are split and one person pays for hosting a smaller server, and the next another, slowly building up the bigger federated Fediverse.

On Lemmy you can just type in Windows 11, and no website to click on to, no bs, you get to hear about what's happening with WIndows 11 from different voices. Is the *Windows cool, a tragedy, is there that one guy that *disfavors it, or is in favor of WIndows 11?

It's all there and you as a user gets to decide for yourself if you like all the results you see, or some, or none of them and then move on with your day as it should be.

Thoughts? Opinions? Statements? Judge rulings?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sramder@lemmy.world 87 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Is this a joke, hyperbole? To build on your example, what if I wanted to find out “how to disable Windows 11 update prompts” into lemmy’s search. Do you think I would get the answer I’m looking for?

I’m not saying I don’t want to be rid of google and all they do. I would pay for 10 proton mail accounts a month if just one of googles data centers spontaneously burst into flames right now!

Well I’m willing to wait a while longer… I have not tried Kagi yet, but I will as soon as I get bored with Midjourney. Hopefully someday we can collectively slip the yoke, but I suspect googles results will get a lot worse first.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 72 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I've heard kids these days search tiktok instead of Google.

Kids are fucking stupid

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 16 points 8 months ago

I was driving my brother in law and he was trying to tell me some news he heard but couldn't get the specifics so he spent ten minutes searching tiktok for it. I couldn't believe it

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've heard that's true for restaurants and stuff like that, such seemed pretty baffling to me considering Google Maps (and others) exists.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

I mean there are cool channels that showcase the food instead of ratings. You can't fake the restaurant AND their food so quickly
Example (Also available on YT): https://www.tiktok.com/@japaneat
The only thing it would need to be a true superpower is to limit an area and then show all restaurants displaying their food.
BUT: This will quickly by gamed as well as nothijg would stop the owner of just creating instagramable dishes that taste just meh but paying the creator to say otherwise.

[–] cosmic_slate@dmv.social 65 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Even the worst of Google searches pull up more relevant content than an empty Fediverse community.

There simply isn’t enough quality content yet.

[–] laxe@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

True but I’m optimistic about the Fediverse long term.

The value of interoperability is recognized by tech users as well as institutions such as the European Union 🇪🇺. It’s only a matter of time until it reaches critical mass.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 34 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What kind of fediverse search are you talking about? Provide a link. That would do much, much more than any explanations or testimonials possibly could.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

You must not have hard problems to solve if fediverse content is able to replace a search engine.

[–] Sal@mander.xyz 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Search engines like google aggregate data from multiple sites. I may want to download a datasheet for an electronic component, find an answer to a technical question, find a language learning course site, or look for museums in my area.

Usually I make specific searches with very specific conditions, so I tend to get few and relevant results. I think search engines have their place.

[–] Rob@lemdro.id 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Good point. While Search Engines do have their place and uses. My issue isn't with the idea of the search engine itself but with seo deciding what resualts show up or will never show up regardless of the quality of the source. A lot of it goes against the open internet.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Do you know what SEO stands for? It's not SEO that is ranking results. SEO is the consequence of ranking results by relevance and quality.

What's your alternative? Give supposedly relevant results randomly? That'd be even worse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nottelling@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Dude, search engines are still the lifeblood of the Internet, even if they're being poisoned. Your proposal to just grow the Fediverse into the place you search for info does nothing more than replace the HTML/hyperlink-based world with a Markdown/ActivityPub-based world. You'll still need a search engine to index and organize zottabytes of data.

If you think for a second that the Fediverse won't immediately be exploited, overrun, and ruined by advertisers the second it becomes large enough to be relevant, you haven't been on the internet very long. It's only a matter of time before one of the big instances sells out to some corporation all the users stay where they are because it's easier, and the process starts again.

This is a never ending battle that decentralization won't solve. Usenet, IRC, email, and early websites were all pretty well decentralized, and they were all overrun with ads, spam, and scams. Part of why so many services became centralized with big providers is that the constant escalation of protection vs. usability needs more resources than small time sysadmins can handle. They sell out, centralize, or shut down.

As far as Google and SEO, the current nightmare was originally Google trying to get SEO under control. Webmasters were learning to game the pagerank system, and the early SEO tools let them do that fairly. Then Google went public, bought DoubleClick and monetized the shit out of it, letting ads override their product, and here we are.

Edit, more:

Lemmy you can just type in Windows 11, and no website to click on to

No, you have a community to click onto. Or a whole-ass instance. Also, I can't just search my instance and get all the potential hits from instances that aren't federated.

no bs

Lol, what? A dozen bs replies for each useful reply, even in the good threads.

you get to hear about what's happening with WIndows 11 from different voices.

Which of those voices exactly is authoritative?

Simply having multiple voices doesn't imply more useful information if most of those voices are full of shit. (Also, it's only a matter of time before half those voices are ads, scams, and bots.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Trash in/trash out. Small communities of experts can create quality content, but after becoming relevant enough astroturfing begins.

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Search engines are good for what you might call "keyword searches" across websites. I'd say SEO spam has degraded quality of hits and made search results less reliable than even 5 years ago. There's a lot more chaff to winnow now in the main search services. You sorta need to discriminate on hits, and dig a bit deeper into the results to find that new nugget you didn't already see 3 or 4 times already in previous searches with similar, but different parameters.

I find the LLM AIs to be slightly better at turning up obscure info these days. The conversation sets some persistent context that's helpful when you need to dial in on obscure stiff like a driver issue, tuning problem or weird product spec. You still need to carefully vet your results, but the AIs understand technical jargon pretty well, and generally return some solid analysis for leas common scenarios.

They're also good for pick-and-shovel work in odd tech areas, but you really need to be careful with the results because they're confidently wrong in speculative conversation only slightly more often than they're confidently right.

That's just my opinion, but it's how I do search these days: use an AI to refine keywords, then use DDG or Google to find familiar sites with corollary content.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Just wait for the bots. Also, search engines have been playing cat and mouse with SEO for a while. I don’t know why it’s gotten so bad lately.

[–] Rob@lemdro.id 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Unlike on Google search, if you see a bot on Lemmy, or Mastodon, you can just block the bot and never see them again. Follow accounts/communities you trust to be reliable for finding info on various topics to eliminate the chances of running into the bots (since you more likely will be looking at your following feed.)

I wish seo would make the web more lively again but I just see them as a lost cause, and the Fediverse as the better future.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've been blocking bots for 6 months now, it's a neverending stream of new garbage.

[–] Rob@lemdro.id 2 points 8 months ago

That's a price to pay to have a free internet.

If bots are an issue, and I believe it can be sometimes, you could try suggesting to Lemmy developers to invest into bot protection for the platform. Also, the instance maintainers themselves.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

So one bot watches and another posts, possibly from an established account farmed with real human labor.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

Fvo "a while" that are about 25 years. The pressure has been going up all the time as more and more companies and spammers try to shoehorn themselves into irrelevant searches.

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Perhaps we use search engines for different purposes... 🤔

I don't use Google, but I definitely use my preferred search engine numerous times daily.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I thought this post was going to be about ChatGPT. Instead it’s about how fediverse search is a replacement for the entire internet, which is utter nonsense.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is only true if you need news or opinions. You can't really search Lemmy for technical questions or search for a specific site which are my main usages of a search engine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Search engines don’t use search engine optimization. Search engine optimization is what people do to get their site to the top of a search engines results.

[–] Rob@lemdro.id 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The search engine basically looks for seo complying sites and pushes them to the top with their algorithm, so search engines do use it, and so do users to push their sites to the top of resualts.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That’s not how it works, like at all. SEO isn’t something to “comply” with. Their algorithm is what SEO is “optimizing” for.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 7 points 8 months ago

Guess this guy never has to look up syntax stuff.

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Google is free, Im searching recipies, websites of companies I might invest in, the law in general and pop-culture crap 90% of the time

Seems like a waste of water and energy to ask a highpowered LLM about it. I heard each query on GPT uses 12L of fresh water, seems wastefull when I could just use a basic google

Edit: it is approx .5L of water for 5 to 50 prompts, thanks google!

[–] Teon@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Rob@lemdro.id 2 points 8 months ago

I'm not as worried about the decline of truth, but rather the decline of the open web. Google is favoring it's search engine for a few. Sites such as Quara, Reddit, cnn always get top resualts. It's never anyone else unless specifically searched for. If you don't specifically search for them others never get heard on Google search.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I only find search engines somewhat irrelevant because I'm almost never searching for, like, a website. I'm searching for information or software that's compiled on 1 of 5 websites and I can usually use the search function on those specific sites.

Used to use search engines to find new websites. Back when Google was new and it was easier to find cool stuff with keywords rather than by adding .com to random words in the URL bar.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'm not going to give the fediverse my address and ask it where the closest dentist/clinic/restaurant is. Also, even if I did, 見る人がほとんどわからないかも。

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Obonga@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is a relative hot take at this moment but as the search results get worse and the fediverse grows it might become true. Time will tell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rob@lemdro.id 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I wanted to add some extra context that I feel some commentators are missing and it could be my fault for not being as specific.

The reason I think search engines are becoming more irrelevant is because seo, it isn't like the year of 2010 where you would find more relevant resualts as easily.

If you read the title and the actual og post contents, you would find out i'm really just ranting about seo.

I did mention in the comments a few times that i'm not necessarily against search engines as they were originally intended to be used, but what seo has become for the modern search engine. Because of that, that is why search engines are becoming irrelevant to me.

So it isn't the issue with search engines at the surface, I do understand how they work, it's rather, what they had become on the inside behind the scenes with seo.

[–] Rob@lemdro.id 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One thing Search engines are good for looking for stores like Aldi's, or Best buy and seeing the type of stuff they sell before you shop there. But if you're looking for anything opinionated, or from real people from *all backgrounds seach engines are becoming less and less of that as they use to be back in the 2008's-2013's

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

100% true, the quality of search results has plummeted. I’ve read lots of articles that propose a myriad of excuses, but at the end of the day Google could fix it if they wanted to. Google search has the quality of free popcorn. 

[–] Rob@lemdro.id 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The difference is I can enjoy some popcorn, seo takes the enjoyment out of most of everything if not everything.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Sure, there’s some good free popcorn out there. It’s just not that common. It wasn’t a great analogy, but I’m sticking with it ;-)

load more comments
view more: next ›