this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
299 points (96.3% liked)

You Should Know

33005 readers
1911 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] simtel20@lemmy.world 89 points 8 months ago (5 children)

This is exactly what I want my tax dollars paying for

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 44 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'd take that 100% of the time over many of the other things our tax dollars pay for. Plus, it's just a website with resources for fathers in general, not a whole site dedicated to dad jokes.

[–] ClopClopMcFuckwad@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (3 children)

You're not happy your tax dollars funded a 20yr war in Afghanistan that was ultimately lost in less than 2 weeks, and Gulf War 2: Iraqi Boogaloo The Hunt for Nonexistent WMDs?

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 16 points 8 months ago

Someone cited recently how much we were paying a year just for air conditioning in Afghanistan: $20 billion. Meanwhile we’re like “hey, maybe children shouldn’t be starving in school and forced to throw their lunch in the trash at the end of the line if they can’t pay for it, maybe states shouldn’t be sending parents to collections for a $90 kid’s lunch bill” and conservatives: WHO’S GONNA PAY FOR THAT??

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/JnX-D4kkPOQ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

You youngsters don't appreciate the best one, Arms For Hostages!

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 8 months ago

Funding for the NRFC is provided through the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, which authorized the use of funds for “the development, promotion, and distribution of a media campaign to encourage the appropriate involvement of parents in the life of any child and specifically the issue of responsible fatherhood, and the development of a national clearinghouse to assist States and communities in efforts to promote and support marriage and responsible fatherhood.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deficit_Reduction_Act_of_2005

Evidently it's reducing deficits!

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This is also exactly why the NEA needs more grant money! Dad jokes are so lame!

[–] mister_monster@monero.town -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Take a wild guess the name of the bill that this was funded in. It's funnier than any joke on the site.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

Hey, hey, hey!!

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee -4 points 8 months ago

Well, the bottom half of wage earners pay zero federal income tax, and around 90% of federal income taxes are paid by the top 10%.

Most people get more back than they had withheld all year. It's most likely that these aren't YOUR tax dollars, and if they are, YOUR contribution is likely microscopic.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 44 points 8 months ago

The National Responsible Fatherhood Clearinghouse is an Office of Family Assistance (OFA) funded national resource for fathers, practitioners, programs/Federal grantees, states, and the public at-large who are serving or interested in supporting strong fathers and families.

tbf the effort spent on the dad joke gizmo was probably like one dev having some fun compared to the rest of the site

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

Still a better use of our tax dollars than the hyper-bloated military budget.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I actually love that we have resourses like this.

My gripe is that they miss the mark by targeting new dads. The reason dad jokes are great is they are the first jokes your kid understands. So I would think dads of 4 to 9 year-olds would be a better target.

The high you feel when your kid cracks up at some offhand dumb joke can't be bottled.

But the reason I love this as a resourse is that explaining jokes to a curious child develops connections in their head in a way that only a parenting rolemodel can really do. So even if it's not laugh-out-loud funny to explain a joke, if your child tells you that they do not get a joke, first and foremost realize that is a vunerable admission. Buddies will rag on you for not getting it. Parents see a gap in their kids' world experience that they can fill.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Somewhat broken on mobile. Classic government.