this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
299 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3867 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 72 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

"Under his eye"

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago

Blessed be the fruit.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 67 points 8 months ago (4 children)

If frozen embryos are children, I can claim them as dependents on my taxes, right?

[–] Duranie@literature.cafe 24 points 8 months ago

I'm assuming that housing and utility expenses are being paid on their behalf, so yes. That should count.

[–] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You assume republicans have an ounce of consistency in their policy positions

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

They’re pretty consistent about doing whatever benefits them most. Otherwise, nah.

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact, the only way you can claim dependents on your taxes is with a social security number. Some people in the US are exempt from the Social Security system and don’t have a number.

So good luck getting a social security number for a frozen embryo.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

New goal unlocked!

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Is masturbation going to considered mass murder? Or premeditated mass murder?

If life begins at conception, can we get some tax laws changed to reflect that?

[–] AltheaHunter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 8 months ago

🎶🎵 Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is great 🎵🎶

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If it is then about 90% of us are gonna be serial killers 😂

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Women are the target. Men will not be prosecuted unless they help women.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It was a masterbation joke. I was trying to make light of the situation based on OP's initial comment.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Oh I know. Mine should be a joke, but it's not.

[–] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm going to keep fapping every time I get horny and if the feds want me to give up my porn, they'll have to cum and take it.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You could have 100 ivf embryos setup and claim them as dependants and they're super cheap to provide for. Just a freeze tank.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

But then risk of a single power outage and you'll be on death row for the murder of 100 kids.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Masturbation? No. Menstruation? Yes.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago

If we're going to keep going this route, I have daughters, and I am tired of calling my senators and representatives every week.

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Someone please reassure me that there’s no way this gets any votes in the senate.

[–] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

There’s probably a couple of nuts in the senate that would go for this, but no way in hell that a majority of republicans want anything to do with this, not to mention the democrat majority and POTUS veto power.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Slightly misleading. The bill was introduced about a month ago, before the Alabama SC ruling. There is no mention of IVF in the bill. That doesn’t mean it would be banned per se, but up to federal courts to interpret.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

With the logic and reasoning capabilities of the current batch of assholes, if it doesn't say it's exempt, it's not exempt.

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

The courts are going to ban it, just as they sanctioned hair-based racial discrimination in TX despite a law protecting against that specific discrimination.

It'll be just like abortion being denied the people. Bans for thee and rights for me

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The US Federal government STILL has no budget since October 1.

[–] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 8 months ago

Don't worry, they're planning on shutting it down
https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/9060749

[–] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago

The neckties these guys wear make it really easy to choke them…just throwing that little fact out there in case you happen to come across one trying to rob you of your civil or human rights.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wonder if they also want to adopt the Korean "babies are a year old at birth" thing too. Or maybe this whole thing is trash and they don't care about internal consistency

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They don't give a fuck about consistency outside of cruelty.

Never forget that the cruelty is the point. All the backwards, hypocritical, batshit insane laws that the right pushes suddenly makes sense when you acknowledge that their only goal is to harm people.

All the "protect the children!", "...babies!", "...egg cells" "...heritage!", "...bathrooms!" etc bullshit only ever serves a single goal, which is to commit evil against groups of people they've chosen to hate.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

I don't believe that's entirely accurate. Like for enough people for it to be a problem yeah they're just cruel. I think it is more accurate though to say that power and control are the point. Some people are willing to do that by creating fear and offering 'solutions'. Imo he cruelty is a side effect of having to continually up the stakes

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"can't prevent conception" bill incoming soon...

Oh look Steve scalise. Every time I see scalise I realize why that guy tried to shoot him...scalise is a horrible person who hurts other people.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)