this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
-90 points (26.6% liked)

Comic Strips

10027 readers
2028 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 71 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don't support this cartoonist, he is a very terrible person. He is a holocaust denier and super transphobic as well

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There was a webpage documenting the stuff, googling "stonetoss is a nazi" or something should give you some results.

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago

Thanks, I had initially deleted because I had found the other links in the comments, thank you any way though!

[–] CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why would anyone downvote someone just asking for a source to back up a claim that some guy I've never heard of is a nazi? That's a completely reasonable request...

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago

Some people just like to be angry or assume you’re angry shrug

Ignorant people gonna be ignorant ig

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 68 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Stonetoss is a garbage person. We don't need to promote anti-vax, anti-LGBT+, racist, Holocaust denying, misogynistic creators.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 53 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago

This was WAY more detailed than I expected. 😂

I don't follow web comics so I don't know this guy or any other artist, but now I know exactly ONE thing about webcomics - that Stonetoss is a nazi!

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 40 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Lol, I love when (especially, terrible) people make shit like this thinking they're making a fantastic point, but are in fact just displaying their wilful ignorance of the thing they're mocking, for posterity..

(To be clear - thinking that using a camera to capture an image is the same as using AI to generate an image shows a lack of understanding of either, or both, those fields)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 23 points 4 months ago

Pebble yeet is a nazi. Don't promote his garbage here, it's not welcome

[–] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I'm more than a little bit concerned that this is being posted by the sole mod of the community.

Edit: Wow, I think I caught a ban for this!

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 4 points 4 months ago

Mod logs are public record fyi

[–] Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 4 months ago

This makes no sense lol

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago

This is just uneducated. Would film be any different? An image sensor is literally capturing the light intensity in the moment, and doing no alteration.

This comic MIGHT have made SOME sense if it was a cell phone whose camera app heavily processed images.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

AI art aside, if you took a photograph of something and posted it to a digital or traditional art community under the pretence that you drew it yourself, you'd absolutely get thrown out.

AI bros do be thinking that all art is the same and there is no nuance.

I guess stonetoss guy is pro-AI now? Another for the pile of reasons to dislike them, I guess.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Oof gonna block you for signal boosting this tosser Nazi and also all the AI bros in the comments

[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 2 points 4 months ago

How fucking stupid.

[–] Questy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If you steal enough cars that you can strip a part from each of them to assemble a new car, should it be marketable? No, the answer is obviously no.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›