Getting real sick of the "don't vote" anarchists. They remind me of insufferable debate-me atheists; you want to agree, but they make it hurt the whole time.
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
238 points (94.7% liked)
Memes
45581 readers
1910 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
You really don’t want to agree though. Voter suppression only hurts you, they’re either blatant russian trolls or completely clueless about just how much blood and effort their ancestors had to give to earn that vote in the first place.
A lot of soldiers died fighting for colonialism under British rule. That doesn't make colonialism a good thing.
I hate this argument that's just being circulated around but nobody ever stops to question.
If you want to make a case for voting for the lesser evil, there's more convincing arguments. I have mine that apply to my own country and I'm sure you have yours.
And this is exactly the kind of lack of perspective that guy is talking about. Imagine if there was no "lesser evil" and you lived in an authoritarian regime where those who love money and power continually rise to the top and take advantage of everybody else. There's not even a chance in that system for peaceful reform, and that's what don't vote idiots don't get because they've never been outside of a modern democracy and have very interesting history "study" habits (usually quoting things out of context and running away when someone tries to hold them to their shit).
No, it is not. The reason the parent poster gave to vote at all costs is not logically sound and won't convince anyone that isn't already convinced.
And convincing others to keep dictators out of power is more efficient at keeping dictators out or power than just posing as morally right. You ain't winning any vote alone, it takes majorities.
I don't understand your argument. Things aren't the best, so fuck it do nothing? Let the people who will vote make all the decisions? I just don't get it. If you can't be bothered to vote, ever if it's for the lesser of two evils, then what can you be bothered to do besides comment online?
He's a "revolutionary" as depicted in the historical documentary The Life of Brian
No need for unproductive name-calling. I didn't disrespect you.
Hopefully it serves as a wakeup call. Not intended to be unproductive, but you're right I shouldn't have been rude.
It does not. I'm still not convinced using shitty feel-good arguments helps keep Trump and other shitheads worldwide out of power.
But I guess reality flies way above the head of the patronizing liberals.
Reread my initial comment.
Edit: for clarity. What I meant is that saying "vote because people died so you could" is stupid. That's meaningless Hollywood shit. It won't convince anyone in disagreement.
Saying: "your son is Minority X and is in concrete, material danger if Y comes into power" successfully helped me convince someone to vote against fascism before, despite them not being fans of who they were voting for. That is an example that worked in my situation, and won't apply to everyone.
We're no longer reasoning in the realm of fairies and unicorns, but are talking about tangible things that people care about.
Imagine if there was no “lesser evil” and you lived in an authoritarian regime where those who love money and power continually rise to the top and take advantage of everybody else. There’s not even a chance in that system for peaceful reform, and that’s what don’t vote idiots don’t get
PoV: you live in a bourgeois democracy
Do you think that Russia invests significant resources in using English speakers to troll in niche reddit clones?
That honestly comes off as super conspiracy brained.
Sounds like what the russians would say!
Nah, there’s plenty of dipshits out there, hexbear can’t all be bots. Meant more on a general internet sense than specifically here.
I meant agree with the other stuff that anarchists talk about, like mutual aid and other ways of "being the change". I like voting.
Voting for a genocidal fascist should hurt.
It's hard to convince tens of millions of people that it matters when electing one party over another doesn't make a material difference in their lives that isn't negative.
Only one of the two parties actively campaigns on hurting people. It's not a difficult choice.
It doesn't matter what they campaign on when the end result is exactly the same regardless.
But it isn't exactly the same, not when you're one of the groups that loses their rights under republican control.
Are you high? The result is absolutely not the same.
the one good argument for that i've seen is: complacency
if anarchists (or x leftists) participate in a rigged democracy, they may start to feel like they're doing something, and doing enough by voting and promoting whomever... while that whom is guaranteed to fail even if they play the game and win the votes (see also: bernie sanders should've had the dnc nomination... the first time he won and the dnc directly intervened and gave it to hillary... and the second time there was collusion to manipulate the votes (buttiegeg dropped, all of his supporters went to biden, warren stayed on, and sanders would've won had she not)
but the left is always going to lose american democracy because democrats and republicans are entrenched...
so the argument goes, if they don't participate in the election, they'll demand other forms of change that will actually accomplish something...
In theory, not voting is a protest strategy where you tie up a wealth of votes behind some set of issues, and thus incentivize politicians to platform those issues to court those votes.
In reality, next to none of the suits in power want anything to do with your issues, and they are tickled pink that they've managed to convince you to voluntarily self-select out of the process.
yeah it breaks down when you realize voting is still powerful...
If we're going to talk about complacency, it has to be mentioned that the rightward lurch of the GOP is owed in large part to the tea party fringe going mainstream. If leftists were to organise and get involved in the party, and keep on doing it at every level, the democrats would have little choice but to give up ground to those ideas. The problem is that with politics the way it is, you have to be something of a cretin, or rich, to see much point in it, and so a lot of good people we'd love to see on the ballot aren't running because they have better things to do with their lives. Campaign finance and media coverage is so fucked up right now that a grassroots local governance campaign based on leftist thought is for most a pretty dire prospect. That's where I want to see us spending our energy, rather than giving up on democracy at all.
preface: you should vote in every election! not just presidential but there's an election every year that still matters... even judges are elected!
anyways, it's kinda like, if you have a shitty broken... say bicycle, where every bit and really the design is broken...
but you need to ride it to do stuff, so you keep spending a lot of resources fixing and maintaining it... jury rigging different bits and pieces to make it sorta rideable...
but if you just walked and recycled it and got/built a new bike with that same energy you spent on the old bike, you'd have a much better bicycling system...
i think there's a better alternative to throwing the whole bike away... but i do think a lot of good people get lost trying to fix their bike bike while ignoring fundamental flaws...
We got a hot one folks
Lol love to have the context
Jesus christ O.o... I had no idea it escalated further
Thought it said watersports for a sec
Wait, I think I just figured out how to thaw some ports
Unironically would be a good idea, if not a logistics and environmental nightmare.
Can we do like a weekly Russian round up?