this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
34 points (94.7% liked)

Star Wars

5175 readers
61 users here now

Discussion for all things Star Wars. Movies, books, games, TV shows and more are welcome.

1. Keep it civil.

2. Keep it Star Wars related.

3. No memeposts. Memes are great and everybody loves them, but there is already !starwarsmemes@lemmy.world for those.

Community icon art from DeviantArt user DavidDeb.

Banner art by Ralph McQuarrie.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dang, I was hoping to adventure with this group a bit longer.

Curious to see where Omega ends up.

And of course, Ventress.

[–] whysofurious@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

So hyped for Ventress, very cool reveal

[–] DigitalGemini@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a Star Wars fan since the 1980s, please sell me on why I should spend time watching this show. I have heard good things but haven’t got around to watching it yet. What makes this show among the best of Star Wars? If it is.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It shows the transition from Republic troops to Empire troops in real time as Palestine seizes control, and the animation is incredible. Probably the best looking animated Star Wars show so far.

[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This anti Palestine propaganda is getting a bit far fetched.

[–] ShadowCat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's certainly not the best, but if you enjoyed the clone wars and the characters of the clones, it's worth watching to see their story continued into the era of the Empire

[–] Kabutor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

this is the correct answer, you liked Clone Wars/Rebels, this is more of that on a more serious tone. You haven''t watched CW/R? Probably you dont care about this

[–] t0fr@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Much hype! I squelled a bit when I heard and saw Ventress

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I always wonder if these current three dimensional CGI animated series are cheaper to produce than live action or traditional animation.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

3D animation is definitely a lot easier/cheaper than 2D, and probably a lot cheaper than live action. Making a good looking 3D character is harder than drawing a frame in a cartoon, but once you have it, animation is much easier, since you don't have to make a new model for each frame. I assume it's also easier to make effects for 3D than live action, since they're stylized and don't have to look lifelike, which is the goal of most CGI in live action media

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mandalorian was about $15 million per episode in season 1.

Clone Wars was about $1 million per episode.

Certainly cheaper to make cartoons than live action, but not exactly shoestring.

It’s difficult for me to find a good price analog to a 2D cartoon made recently that has a similar amount of action, and doesn’t have the budget weirdly skewed by licensing.

I would guess that to make a traditional animation as detailed, full of motion even in backgrounds, and full of constant action scenes it would probably be more expensive and time consuming compared to 3D.

[–] Devdogg@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

So psyched about Omega, is she going to be swinging a lightsaber?!?