this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
317 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
6217 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The language of the linked article by Mr Barrington Salmon may seem to veer into conspiracy territory at times…if it wasn't so well-documented. At the risk of "yelling into a echo chamber"…

“The actions of liberal politicians in Washington have created a desperate need and unique opportunity for conservatives to start undoing the damage the Left has wrought and build a better country for all Americans in 2025,” the Project 2025 manifesto said. “It is not enough for conservatives to win elections. If we are going to rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left, we need both a governing agenda and the right people in place, ready to carry this agenda out on day one of the next conservative administration.”

Meyerson, editor-at-large at The American Prospect, said far-right conservatives and The Heritage Foundation have an extensive enemies’ list that includes “welfare recipients, lazy and liberal civil servants, anti-business regulators, environmentalists, and union bosses, “scientists, woke bureaucrats, woke educators, woke diplomats, woke generals and admirals, woke G-men, and anyone who doesn’t indulge the next Republican president’s every whim (an adaptation to the likelihood of a Trump nomination),” in the commentary titled, “The Far Right Has a Plan to Remake America. They Even Wrote It Down.”

America is at an inflection point, vacillating on a knife’s edge because of Trump, who has tapped into a deep reservoir of grievance, hatred and resentment plans that will be fully unleashed in a second term. Trump’s incendiary rhetoric – mirroring Hitler and Mussolini – is convincing observers that he’s a fascist, to add to his authoritarian bent.

⚜ ⚜ ⚜

There is no more neutrality in the world. You either have to be part of the solution, or you're going to be part of the problem.

-- Eldridge Cleaver

⚜ ⚜ ⚜

!detroit@midwest.social!michigan@midwest.social

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 72 points 10 months ago

woke G-men

Imagine being such a fucking fascist you think the FBI is "woke."

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuck the Koch brothers. This is their doing and they need a swift kickto thee teeth

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

One of them has been dead for years

[–] Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That may make the teeth-kicking less satisfying. It doesn't make it any less necessary.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's always grave-pissing.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Whatever needs to come out at the time.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 10 months ago

Oh boy, soupy, corn filled diarrhea it is. Won't need no poop knife with that kind of shit coming out.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

That sounds like his problem.

[–] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 39 points 10 months ago

I think people need to realize this is more prevalent within the conservative religious circles than they realize. Beyond the extremes of the rapture that's been coming any day for decades, they want set their world right once and for all.

When they throw around terms like battleready there's a outcome where they get to kick in the heads of those they don't like and don't want to exist without due process.

They are going to end all that is wrong around them with brute force and finally do what those corrupt politicians, justices, police, and government workers won't do.

They want to bypass anything that complicates their mob punishment. Trump keeps feeding these types as it's useful for him to have them rattled and ready to go. The group think will not allow those stung by him to speak their truths against him. It's not allowed.

He is the messiah chosen by God. You know the thrice married, adulterer with porn stars while the wives were pregnant role model the religious right have been looking for all this time.

Thank God they found him to help God save the day. God the almighty and all powerful needs a orange colored grifter loser to help God out on the mission.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Vote against this but remember to have a plan b that doesn't involve living the US.

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When Putin took over Russia and turned it into him getting 99% of the votes every election, most people of Russia did not leave. When Putin cracked down on journalists, free speech, and gay/queer people, hell even his own oligarchs aren't safe next to a Russian window, most people of Russia did not leave. When Russia invaded Ukraine, the first and second time, most people of Russia did not leave.

Have Russians bought the Kremlin propaganda hook, line and sinker? What does it take for a citizen to say enough is enough before they leave their country? Do Russians lack the means to afford the ability to leave their homeland, potentially forever from friends, and generations of families? Unfortunately, most people whether it's Russia or the US, simply do not have the means, the finances, the connections, or the resources to leave. A minority of us will have access to this luxury, but for a majority of us, we are simply fucking stuck. And in case it's not clear, I do not support Russia, I hope the Putin regime collapses sooner than later.

[–] thatsux0rz@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Funny thing is Republican states are more dependent on the Federal Government than Democrat states. So they are going to stop themselves? https://www.governing.com/finance/are-republican-states-more-federally-dependent.html

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Well not those people of course, those are the good people.

What they meant was brown/gay people. And that's just to start with.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 months ago

I believe that people will do the right thing and vote against fascism and for democracy. There is no plan b for me.

Also, as far as emigration is concerned, it is important to remember that dictatorships like Russia, China, and North Korea are all waiting for a second Trump term to invade NATO members of Europe, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific, and South Korea respectively. Regions of the world that seem safe now may soon be at war.

This is not intended to discourage anyone from moving. If you have a safe place to go, don't let me stop you. But it's important to remember that a second Trump term will have wide reaching consequences beyond the United States.

[–] malchior@aussie.zone 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Now, please correct me if I am wrong, but as a non American, it seems funny to me that one of the points of gun ownership is/was in case of resisting a tyrannical government. And from where I am sitting, it sure does look like angry orange man is getting away with a lot of things that us non orange people would definitely be locked away for.

It seems to me that the judicial system over there is compromised and that's the beginning of the slippery slope.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, that's what people say. But those people also tend to worship cops. The fact is that they can't wait to help the cops murder their "radical left" (and immigrant) neighbors.

As shitty as that is, and it is shitty, their aren't enough people raking the threat seriously. And I don't mean by voting harder for Joe, I mean preparing to protect themselves and their neighbors.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 points 9 months ago

It's based on a misreading of the 2nd amendment on the one hand, and on cornball cos-play fantasy on the other. The 2nd was intended so that state government could muster militias to put down insurrections such as Shay's Rebellion, which it was written in specific reaction to.

As for the cos-play bit, there is no universe in which a private militia, no matter how well-armed, is going to have any chance at all of resisting the military power of contemporary US law enforcement. It's a fucking joke.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry, everyone. I've been told that change only ever happens in tiny increments.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 23 points 10 months ago

Building up happens brick at a time, pulling down happens at freefall speeds

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Half-bricks are currently fully legal to own and carry. Just pointing it out

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

What about one in each hand?

And, I know, before you stop to remind me: "Well then, what would you carry the molotov in, smartypants?", but who goes around carrying two fully-legal half bricks without a like-minded compatriot just as passionate about nonchalant, platonic sight-seeing strolls? And, if only a half brick per person is the limit, why we just hand off one to the other and then we're fully kitted with both the question and the answer, neighbor.