this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
117 points (95.3% liked)

Programming.dev Meta

2464 readers
8 users here now

Welcome to the Programming.Dev meta community!

This is a community for discussing things about programming.dev itself. Things like announcements, site help posts, site questions, etc. are all welcome here.

Links

Credits

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey everyone. Some of you may have seen the recent announcement with blahaj to defederate with the instance. Ive been handling things privately and wanted to do an announcement to catch you all up on the results of that

#1: Background knowledge

Realized that not everyone knows how the instance is structured so figured I would do a little section in the front to go over that (especially for visitors reading this from other instances)

We currently have 8 admins in the instance. Of those 2 people are currently lead admins (snowe and I). Majority of admins are part of the community team but not all of them (people are split between infrastructure, development, and community). I was planning out a team page similar to what lemmy.world has to go over this with a bit more detail and that should be coming in the future. Main thing though is its intentionally structured so one person doesnt solely have power (hence the two leads). If one person ends up messing up theres the other lead and the rest of the admin team to talk with them about it and help them do better in the future.

#2: What happened?

There was a thread in lemmy.ml about the hogwarts legacy game winning a steam award. For reference for the following images + description, snowe is the other lead admin for the instance apart from me and the other people are various other users

There was a conversation that ended up essentially devolving into a slap fight within this post (ive purged the entire conversation so people dont stumble onto it in the future but ill post images here with them for archiving reasons and to explain it)

^ These comments were what initially started it. Essentially it was an argument about the hogwarts legacy game being or being not transphobic

^ Later in the argument

^ One branch that ended up getting started due to the frontend snowe uses on mobile not showing pronouns (how most instances handle it currently is its appended to the end of the display name but some frontends choose to ignore the display name and just do the username instead)

(edit: changed the word triggered to started to make it more clear what definition of triggered I used. Forgot that tends to not be common usage)

There are other branches but it is a very large amount to screenshot and dont want this to completely flood this post. Everything should be available in the modlogs still if you want to dig a bit deeper or I can send other screenshots in the replies on this post if youre interested in what was said for certain parts

#3 Aftermath

Due to the argument above blahaj chose to defederate with programming.dev which was going to take effect 48 hours after their announcement on it. (This is due to the person in the conversation being one of our lead admins which is ultimately understandable as they represent the instance)

snowe has sent a message apologizing to ada (the lead admin for blahaj). I dont know the contents of what was said but if they want the two of them can choose to publicize it.

One of our admins should not have escalated the situation and participated in this slap fight so on behalf of the admin team here were sorry about that

Internally we have a guidebook for admins to follow for the various aspects of the instance (moderation, applications, etc.). Ive refined this guidebook with a couple new rules for admins that should be taking effect in the future

  • admins will be required to have two accounts, one for admin activities and one for non admin activities. This is how some admins have already been interacting in the fediverse and basically makes it so comments done on the non-admin account should not be taken as that admin speaking on behalf of the instance. Generally the admin account will be things done relating to admin duties (e.g. my posts here in meta) while the non-admin account is other various conversations. Admins can be as anonymous as they want with the non-admin account similar to how our users here can be as anonymous as they want with their accounts
  • im adding in some guidelines for tone while chatting for the admins so comments made that are on behalf of the instance should be respectful and not devolve to slap fights

Like I said before in #2 ive also purged the entire conversation to avoid people stumbling onto it and seeing a slap fight with an admin that has since apologized. As the community exists on lemmy.ml I cant fully do this due to how federation works in lemmy but the mods in the community have been doing the same which should federate.

This should not have happened in the first place and we as an admin team will be better going forward

I hope the blahaj instance sees our actions and chooses to reverse the defederation decision but at the end of the day its their instance and they can choose whoever they want to federate with (note federation is done directionally. I will still leave our direction of federation open)

Edit: Blahaj stopped their defederation (shown in an edit on their announcement) so the two instances will still be federated both directions going forward

Another edit: its a work day, its midnight here, and some comments here are also devolving into slapfights. Ive locked the post since this has already taken up most of my free time to try to handle and moderate this. My dms are always open if you want to dm me regarding the situation

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 81 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Instances getting de-federated over such trivial things is going to be the death of lemmy.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 54 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Nah it'll just kill Blahaj. Trigger happy instances cause people to leave and join more permissive places, because let's be real, a user should curate their affiliations and connections, not an admin on their behalf.

I am happy on .ca because I have the freedom to interact with essentially everyone worth interacting with. If it was not the case I may have gone over to .world or any of the other billion awesome instances we have. I could even run my own, if it came down to it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (9 children)

Man, I wish blahaj would defend from the instance I'm on.

I've blocked a ridiculous amount of their meme subs, but there's nothing to do about their comments.

If there was more of them, then I might consider moving to somewhere they don't federate with.

Throwing a tantrum because someone is used to nongendered pronouns is just ridiculous.

I use they/them/ya'll for pretty much everything. There's very few cases where any type of gendered language is necessary.

We should just move away from it all together.

I just don't get their logic insisting people use gendered pronouns, it's not misgendering, it's just not including unnecessary context.

Edit:

All that being said, I'm not supporting anything related to JKR, never have.

That makes sense, but the slapfight in the screenshots is ridiculous

Edit 2:

And from Blahaj's post, it looks like the majority of their users are saying defederaion doesn't make sense either?

Sounds like their admin is just going rouge on their own.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Ada does whatever. They clearly want a walled garden. Let them have it. Who cares, really?

I'm all for supporting trans issues and all but like bro can I not be criticized for enjoying a game from a beloved childhood franchise? You know how many artists are garbage people? It's just gotten easier to know who sucks because they all get big heads and go on twitter.

[–] Meganium97@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 9 months ago (5 children)

It didn't even look bad tbh. I view it as the admin getting hard baited by a hexbear user. Do take in mind - you aren't alone in this sentiment. Basically everybody here told our admins it would be a bad idea to defederate.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] th3raid0r@tucson.social 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I agree. My instance is locally focused so I can just ask rando's off the street here in Tucson. Turns out people don't like feeling controlled very much and want to be able to talk to friends that are on other platforms, and that's why we won't be defederating from meta/threads.

I have a sense, though, that Blahaj is mostly not real people. Sometimes I wonder how easy it might be to give someone like Ada a false sense of support by loading up the instance with LLM bots that all act like Her. (It's her, right? God please don't dox me)

Ive just grown skeptical that people actually operate like this in real life, or rather, enough people to actually matter. And that makes me further question the authenticity of entire instances like Beehaw or Blahaj as "lefty safe spaces". Seems to me that they function more as a way to provide reasons to dismiss the progressive movement rather than join them.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 13 points 9 months ago

It's not just the trivial things themselves -- it's also the idea that admins will have to police their users for trivial missteps, under threat of defederation, so no one will want to run a server.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 51 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I've been kind of watching this from the sidelines. Requiring separate admin and general use accounts is definitely a good idea, but it doesn't absolutely solve the problem of "someone who possesses greater power expressing themselves in confrontational ways." Once you're wearing an "admin hat," you can't ever really take it off, and you have to know that your actions are always going to be under greater scrutiny, regardless of the user account in question.

However.

I'm a big proponent of "we call people what they want to be called," but this is the very first time I have ever heard that using generic pronouns is somehow consciously offensive. I get that if Party A has made undeniably clear what pronouns they use, and Party B insists on using generic pronouns, yeah, that could be an action consciously intended to offend or put down - but I also think that it's not necessarily and always that way. Context matters, and the context in this particular incident suggests (to me, at least) that transphobia has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Language is an ever changing thing, although it may change more slowly than desired. When you're talking about extremely foundational bits of language - like pronouns - it takes a huge amount of effort (especially for older people, of which I am one) to get your brain to change gears and use the words and thoughts that you want to. I know this from personal experience. When I am talking to or about a person in my own family, who I have known since his birth 18+ years ago, it is extremely difficult to adjust to a "new paradigm," even when "new" means "several years in the making." I suspect that I will always have to make conscious efforts to think and speak in ways that I want to, and that I won't always get it right. Just because I don't always get it right doesn't make me a transphobe.

Forklift that situation over to text on a screen with someone who is essentially anonymous to me, with whom I may never have interacted with before, it's highly likely that I'm going to get it wrong even if I try. Then, if I use the generic pronoun "they" in order to avoid misgendering someone, and I get smacked down for that? That's just plain unreasonable, and I have no interest interacting with anyone who would throw shade for that reason.

For blahaj to threaten defederating with an entire instance over just that is completely unreasonable. Maybe that threat was taken based on an incomplete or inaccurate understanding of the facts. Maybe there are facts that I don't know. What I do know is that just because someone uses strong language to disagree with someone else doesn't mean there's any bigotry at play.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 15 points 9 months ago

Just to make we fully exhume the original argument -- I hang out with a lot of trans and nb people and I've noticed people just saying "they" to everyone, and I kinda love it. If everyone's just they then no one needs pronouns. The first part of the long term mission, to destabilize gender completely, starts with shit like that - taking all gender out of language.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 9 months ago

I honestly admire the transparency of the updates on the p.d meta community. Thanks for sharing the background, despite the situation not being ideal

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 44 points 9 months ago (24 children)

From the screenshots, it looks like snowe wasn't being aggressive at all. And getting hate for using "they" is excessive. It's a shorter way of saying "that person". Blahaj (a blue shark from IKEA? I don't get it) shouldn't be this touchy about stuff. It's like a C programmer getting offended about being called a programmer.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] th3raid0r@tucson.social 25 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I'm in agreement here, and given Blahaj's trigger-happy nature when it comes to defederation, I'm not sure I care all that much.

I've seen them defederate so many other instances for "wrong-think" and I don't think Snowe should feel like he's in the wrong here.

It's only a matter of time before they defederate from my own instance, tucson.social, because I don't think 100% like them. I apparently support trans genocide because... checks notes... I don't think that doxxing far right reactionaries/extremists is an effective tactic for garnering sympathy and building a movement.

Yup, that's it. Apparently that opinion makes you a Nazi sympathizer in these circles.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] towerful@programming.dev 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Shit I default to they usually until I get corrected

It's more inclusive than just making assumptions plus working in a customer facing position I got in the habit of gender neutral terms and holiday agnostic seasonal greetings

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 32 points 9 months ago (8 children)

I think it would be reasonable to defederate from blahaj.zone. A majority of the toxic, negative, and aggressive comments I see on Lemmy seem to come from users of either blahaj or hexbear. The admin very intentionally curates a cult-like community by posting provocative posts and then banning everyone who expresses even slight disagreement. They have engaged in and doubled down on false accusations of CP against the lemmynsfw admins, which demonstrates that they are a risk for other instances be federated with. I normally very strongly oppose dedederation, but I think blahaj is a great example of when it makes sense. This is because the admin seems intent on starting drama rather than working with other instances to resolve conflict. It almost feels like some form of religious extremism lol

I of course block the instance from my account to avoid seeing posts from there, but toxic users are still visible on comments.

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The team is fairly unison in wanting to avoid defederation as much as possible and leave it users to filter out content they personally don't enjoy. Programming is a big and diverse field, and we want to make it as open as possible to everyone. Unless the instance breaks our own rules as described in the sidebar under "federation rules", I feel like it would be an overreach by us to defederate an instance due to personal opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 13 points 9 months ago

For what it's worth, HB and Blahaj mostly hate each other, too.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Idk, often when I see someone with pronouns in the username I hover over the name to check the instance, and normally if they're being an asshole in the comment it's hexbear and if they're being nice and reasonable it's blahaj, so to me it doesn't seem quite the same.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Aquilae@hexbear.net 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

That instance is quite liberal (heh) with its defederation so this isn't entirely unusual.

Tbh though this one makes more sense than the other instances they've defederated given that theirs is centered around trying to be trans-positive.

Even weirder how they defederated Hexbear then though; that conversation is with Hexbear users who they clearly agree with.

[–] Wisp@hexbear.net 19 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Hexbear defederated blahaj first if I remember right

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 19 points 9 months ago

Even weirder how they defederated Hexbear then though; that conversation is with Hexbear users who they clearly agree with.

They are friendly to chasers and really heckin' mad about tankies, so they won't get along with HB even if both parties rightfully hate Rowling.

[–] sab@kbin.social 17 points 9 months ago

No offence, but I will never be confused by anyone's decision to defederate with Hexbear.

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How do I always miss the drama on this instance? Moments like this make me realize I'm not as terminally online as I thought.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

This is so stupid lmao

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago (4 children)

This is so dumb you should defed with Blahaj in principle. I don't even use this instance but it's kinda pathetic that you guys have to deal with this.

Apparently defending oneself from attacks in a discussion is "aggression". No consequences for the others in that thread I assume.

It's also completely insane that the use of "they" to refer to anyone would be soft transphobia. That's one of the main purposes of that word - especially on the internet. Some languages don't even have he/she it's literally just THEY in their language e.g Tagalog has 'sila' for singular 'they' and 'sha' for plural they. There is no he/him/her/she in that language.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] elint@programming.dev 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm glad everything worked out in the end. I hope snowe learned a couple of lessons from this. One about how to interact and respect the lived experiences of marginalized peoples, but also a lesson about not engaging with hexbear trolls in the first place.

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 22 points 9 months ago

respect marginalized people!

by calling them all trolls

dog come the fuck on, how do you get this close and then shit the bed so hard

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

We're in your walls code monkey

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm surprised mods and admins don't have the option to choose not to distinguish their posts and comments.

[–] Ategon@programming.dev 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

There is a distinguish option that adds a shield but its a bit redundant since it marks you with the flairs anyways

Only way to really get around it for now is the multiple accounts

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago

Dumb. You ban users and defederate for poor moderation. Granted, folks can run their instance into the ground however they want.

load more comments
view more: next ›