this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
573 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2917 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 100 points 10 months ago (1 children)

While I didn't think that they would go after a dictionary, it's not surprising that fascists would go after a book full of definitions.

[–] Dreadnaught@sh.itjust.works 44 points 10 months ago (1 children)

After reading a little bit, it's not that they banned dictionaries, but it seems the district got ahead of the curve. The law itself is the problem

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 40 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's why they have an overly broad definition of what is prohibited. So they can pick and choose what they will allow.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago (5 children)

In this case I think the district is doing this in protest. The legislators intended to pick and choose, but the district is applying it as written, so Dictionaries are out. They're highlighting how absurd the law is.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

That was my impression, similar move to schools banning the Bible citing all the beastiality, rape and mass murder in there

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Eh, I think this is going to play into the legislator's designs.

[–] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My thoughts as well. This leads to "only approved books allowed."

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

That's literally and explicitly the point.

From the end of the article:

In a brief submitted by the State of Florida in support of Escambia, Attorney General Ashley Moody argued that the school board could ban books for any reason because the purpose of public school libraries is to "convey the government’s message," and that can be accomplished through "the removal of speech that the government disapproves."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] b3an@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Welcome to 1984

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They have already stated they want "their people" to be the deciders. It’s just textbook fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 76 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Check this bit from the end:

In a brief submitted by the State of Florida in support of Escambia, Attorney General Ashley Moody argued that the school board could ban books for any reason because the purpose of public school libraries is to "convey the government’s message," and that can be accomplished through "the removal of speech that the government disapproves."

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What in the absolute fuck?

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Blessed Bog Brother Be

Under His Allseeing Eye

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catch22@startrek.website 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They keep sayin' we're free, but we're all just loose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 8 points 10 months ago

The party of small govt (except for pushing christofascism)

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ashley Moody is a fascist traitor

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 52 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Parents NEED to lodge formal complaints with the police and school boards in EVERY district that still has dictionaries and encyclopedias in the libraries.

Whittle down every district until they're only allowed to work on coloring books for every grade K-12, or as close as they can get.

Don't forget to target private schools with massive social media campaigns to inform all parents that dictionaries = grooming. If the private schools refuse to respond, convince the dumber wealthy parents to pull their kids and put them into a safe school, without books.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Conservative = Stupid

Coloring books in place of books is exactly how you grow the Republican voter base.

Mindless exploitable industrial scale human production is the end game of the Republican army of the Oligarchy. It's industrial cattle, but humans; eat garbage, consume everything you're told, ask no questions, and barely survive. If anything bad happens, use your gun to take yourself out and/or whatever other farm stock you feel oppressed and frustrated with inside your little pin.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Even if what you're saying is true, and I'm not going to take a position either way, it doesn't have any bearing on my suggestion.

DeSantis is a reply guy with power. This bill wasn't passed because a majority of FL voters want it, not even a majority of his voters. This bill, like many others, was simply him trying to ride the culture war to the White House, but it failed. The only thing keeping it in place in inertia and the desire to save face. That only changes if the political calculus changes.

I guarantee you that if these book bans were exploited to force the closure of ALL public school libraries, remove dictionaries and encyclopedias from all classrooms, and basically made to significantly impact ALL FL parents, or even just the wealthier areas, the public outcry from parents would be enough to reverse it.

[–] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Exactly, parents will care when their children who received a Florida education are not competitive enough to compete in a capitalist environment. They'll realize this soon enough when their children haven't learned anything in school aside from propaganda.

Let them sacrifice their own children to Mammon. It is what they said they wanted, after all. Maybe this will be the wake up call they finally need. They wanted to "stop woke" and didn't realize it meant "stay asleep, plebs."

As someone who train-hooped out of Florida years ago, I fucking warned y'all and now it's happening. I knew this was the trajectory when Jeb Bush got elected in the 1990s and I was in middle school at the time!

I think when parents realize DeSantis just sentenced their kids to fighting to be menial wage slaves for the local corrupt petty bourgeois of every little shithole county while they have to attempt to convince professionals to move to their state they will regret all this and unfortunately the only way they will ever learn is by once again screwing themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 000@fuck.markets 17 points 10 months ago

But that's their goal, they want kids to be stupid so they'll vote republican when they grow up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

because it exposes students to "alternate sexual ideologies." Baggett said she was concerned "a second grader would read this book, and that idea would pop into the second grader's mind… that these are two people of the same sex that love each other."

This is the kind of people we are dealing with. They are literally trying to prevent children from developing accepting attitudes towards minorities. That is their stated goal. It's not often I read such blatant disgusting hatred coming from a teacher. The book she was referencing was And Tango makes three. Which is unbelievable in the context of her statement. Were the penguins, who were real actual penguins, somehow a part of an "alternate sexual ideology"? How badly rotten does your brain have to be to think "sexual ideology" when you see 2 penguins raising a baby together?

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You see, tolerance is a slippery slope. First you tolerate the Irish. Next thing you know Italians are semi-ok. Then Polish?! Eventually Catholics and Jews are acceptable. So long as none of these marry across lines.

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ziixe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

Ah, don't you just love when (a part of) the land of freedom advertises propaganda (or censors unwanted ideas more appropriately) against a minority from the early age

Doesn't even remotely resemble anything else /s

[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

I hope they've alerted their groundskeepers that all trees, shrubs, bushes, and flowers must be mowed over, because pollen and flowers are Nature's pole-dancers and sluts. Not sure if they can have grass.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Grass is a euphemism for marijuana so they can't have that or it will give kids ideas

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Oh no! We can’t have people, let alone children, getting ideas!

[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Grass will flower if you don't mow it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That book defines "racism" and "slavery" and may contain examples. Conservatives definitely don't want white kids finding out their ancestors may have been conservatives.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Ancestors? I don't think you have to go that far back

[–] BlitzFitz@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is no one else looking at this line the school district is at this point just pulling every possible book that could match the description of the law in purpose to make a point?

One teacher made a complaint about a couple of books so they said fine, well just remove everything else that this bill could possibly touch. Just to prove how ambiguous and far stretching this law can go?

Of course they shouldn't pull a dictionary but it matches the description. This is to test the law.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Pulling the dictionary accomplishes what they want: a dumber future generation.

Pull the Bible, that's what riles them up

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Fantastic. Now those pesky kids won’t know what fascism means.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 11 points 10 months ago

Pesky Kid: I looked up the word "fascist" on my parent's phone, and it showed a picture of Ron DeSantis. Weirdly, it does the same when you lookup "dumbass..."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

HB 1069 gives residents the right to demand the removal of any library book that "depicts or describes sexual conduct," as defined under Florida law, whether or not the book is pornographic.

I was going to ask how their bible gets around this, but then I found several instances of its removal in Florida.

These librarians. I like them. Assuming they're doing this as a statement.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago

/m/MaliciousCompliance is leaking :D

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 16 points 10 months ago

The reality in Escambia County serves as a rejoinder to DeSantis, who has described concerns about book removals as a "leftist activist hoax" and a "false political narrative."

If Floridians had a dictionary to look up "rejoinder" with, they'd be very upset.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I thought this was an Onion article when I saw the title.

I wish I was right.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Soon: "All books are now banned because they contain the letters L, G, B, T and Q. Any books containing these five letters will now be banned from public libraries."

[–] ray@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ernest Vincent Wright: "Hold my beer"

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ernes* Vincen* Wri* h*

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Guess they got tired tired of hearing "words have meanings" in response to their mindless rambling.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We should also ban math books, and history books. Full of sexual descriptions and imagery. Ban economy books too, full baabout advice on how to rape the poor, and the bible too with its incest and rape stories, and you know, let's ban all the books and then just go to school to hold hands and sing hallelujah and praise Jesus.

I see a number of Republican politicians getting very wet at this idea...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

DeSantis has a stranglehold on people here in FL because he kept stuff open during Covid. So people mindlessly co-sign everything he does and Dems pretty much have given up here. They are going after all forms of education and history they don't agree with.

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

They did keep guns though. Those are more important.

[–] batmaniam@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

lol to the bit about Atlas Shrugged. Although yeah there are a few passages in there that are basically erotica, forgot about that. It's been a long time but I remember them being "NC-17" not "R" rated.

(usual thing I have to say here about this book here: I'm aware it's badly written and terrible as philosophy excersize, I just liked my steam-punk sci-fi with trains)

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

With rights to request removal of books when they have descriptions of sexual activity, I'd say the bible is definitely a prime target. It has incest, rape, and even those are kind of fan favorites for republican politicians, they too must recognize that Bible's are evil and must be banned.

load more comments
view more: next ›