this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
665 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Jay Ashcroft flopped when faced with the most dreaded predicament amongst grandstanding blowhards: a follow-up question

Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft’s attempt to justify his ludicrous threat to have President Joe Biden removed from the state’s electoral ballot spiraled into chaos over the most basic of questions: “How so?”

During a Monday interview with CNN’s Boris Sanchez, the Republican was asked how he justified his threats to have Biden removed from the state’s ballot in retaliation for recent attempts to remove Trump from state ballots on grounds that his actions in the aftermath of the 2020 election constitute insurrection. The constitutionality of such a removal will soon be reviewed by the Supreme Court.

“What would then be your justification for removing Joe Biden from the ballot in Missouri. Has he engaged in your mind in some kind of insurrection?” Sanchez asked.

“There have been allegations that he’s engaged in insurrection,” Ashcroft replied. He was then met with the most dreaded predicament amongst grandstanding blowhards: a follow-up question.

“How so?” Sanchez asked, prompting Ashcroft to demand that Sanchez stop interrupting him. “You can’t say something like that and not back it up,” Sanchez countered.

“You interrupted me before I could back it up,” a flustered Ashcroft complained. “Are you scared of the truth?”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@kbin.social 177 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ashcroft: "Are you scared of the truth?"

Sanchez: "Oh, I am not terrified of the truth at all, seems like you might be."

You need to watch those clips in the Xitter link. Sanchez is on fucking fire and does not let up.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 112 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (10 children)

I'll watch it somewhere, but it's not going to be at TwitX.

Edit here: https://youtu.be/pIsVB-H_M_8?feature=shared

The most relevant part starts around 4:22 but the whole thing is good (well, up until the YouTuber jumps in with his take, which fortunately is after the CNN segment)

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit that was embarrassing for Jay Ashcroft. He proved he's a legal scholar equivalent of a nepo baby because he is so grossly incompetent at understanding how state law works. If this guy was your attorney, the very real question of capability and competency would come up.

Hopefully his dad will help him understand the law better because having 2 J Ashcrofts be that hilariously dumb is a bad look.

[–] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've heard better arguments from an L1 than this bozo. But you know what they say: if the law is on your side, pound the law. If the facts are on your side, pound the facts. If neither is on your side, pound the table. All he has is the table.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Thanks for the non-shitter link

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 21 points 10 months ago

Fantastic. 🍿

I also immediately switched off when the YouTuber started talking.

[–] WhyYesZoidberg@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ it’s like these people are in preschool or something

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 84 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We need more journalism that pushes back like this.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

We certainly do, but we shouldn't kid ourselves into thinking that would accomplish much with these fuckers. They'll just start avoiding the journalists that refuse to stay neutral or lob them softballs.

It's not like their supporters are going to shame them for doing that, either. I'm shocked any Republican talks to any reporter that isn't from Fox News anymore.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

They’ll just start avoiding the journalists that refuse to stay neutral or lob them softballs.

The problem with that is thinking that the follow-up question, "How so?" is anything BUT neutral or a softball. It's just a basic question; it literally could not be MORE neutral.

This fool could have been on Newsmaxx or OANN and gotten that same question from a friendly interviewer trying to offer him the space to lay out more slanderous innuendo, unaware that Jay Ashcroft is completely unprepared for even that tiny amount of latitude.

I know that's not your position or what you personally are advocating, but jesus fucking christ that's an easy one. "So-and-so did something bad." Response: "How so?"

To blatantly twist a quote from The Godfather, Jay Ashcroft showed up for that interview with nothing but his dick in his hand . . . and his hand wasn't even full.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml 85 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The follow-up question was literally "What accusations are you making against Biden to justify removing him from the ballot?"

Like dude, you can literally make up anything and your base would eat it up. You couldn't even do that. What a moron, and he'll still lose almost zero support from his base because they didn't actually pay attention.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The Ashcrofts have always been smooth-brained. But Jay's is so smooth that quarks could ice skate on it.

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Oh, wow. I hadn’t put 2 and 2 together that this is John Ashcroft’s kid. Chip off the old block it appears. 😂

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 12 points 10 months ago

you can literally make up anything and your base would eat it up

They know.

They do. Every day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 85 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Isn’t Missouri the show me State? Is this fucktard going to show any evidence of insurrection or just blather on about how other governors have made the claim of insurrection against Biden? My god Republicans are stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid to the fucking core.

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 42 points 10 months ago (14 children)

That's why they attack education constantly. Education prevents conservatives.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Please stop assigning stupidity to things that are openly and brazenly malicious.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

He's brazenly malicious and stupid. You can be both. He is both.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] numbermess@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Their business is only in propping up accusations, so he's just gonna blather.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Missouri is one of the last and proudest slave states (followed only by Arkansas, Texas, and Florida - go figure?). They routinely slaughtered Kansans for their refusal to brutalize and own other humans. Rush Limbaugh is from there. Ferguson police just shoot black people for sport and openly laugh about it. It's an infected polyp on the anus of racist America with some of the worst, most hateful people scowling and lurching around in it.

That this chud would be representing the people of Missouri is not a surprise at all.

They do have some lovely scenery though, and there are a few decent people there as well. Just - on the political front, you can pretty well expect when you hear Missouri it won't be good news.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 62 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The GOP can never actually explain their reasoning when people push back usually.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 28 points 10 months ago

Almost like they have no reasoning!

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 56 points 10 months ago (5 children)

You can’t tell me this clown is not inbred. Or at least the progeny of some sort of greasy-haired weasel creature.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 79 points 10 months ago (3 children)

His dad was afraid of the nipples on statues.

I miss the days when he was the most embarrassing Attorney General J. Ashcroft in the country.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I thought this was the same guy and was thinking he aged well

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago (4 children)
[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I knew asscraft was involved with this somehow.

[–] MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

There it is. Was wondering if there was any relation, to the point where I had half a mind to look it up myself. Thanks for saving me the trouble.

It's nepotism and cronyism all the way down.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

OOOOhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Right!

Well fucking hell, Missouri.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hegar@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

some sort of greasy-haired weasel creature.

Brutal imperialist torture lawyer, as it happens.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] moog@lemm.ee 51 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ashcroft got absolutely roasted holy Christ. "Duh duh duh huh what??? There have been allegations! I just don't know them"

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Um um um... They're in Hunter Bidens laptop! And in Hilary's email! And uh... Pizzagate. Um... PEDOPHILES! VOTER FRAUD!

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sadly, I grew up in that state and I can tell you that a huge swath of the people that live there will see it the exact opposite.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised. I'm in Virginia and I see MAGAts argue that having the gall to ask why is in and of itself an admission of guilt.

"Bidens a traitor!"

"Why?"

"YOU KNOW WHY IF HE'S INNOCENT WHY YOU SO WORRIED ABOUT IT HUH?!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago

Wow. The look of utter and genuine surprise at how our government functions is absolutely priceless.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 45 points 10 months ago

What a snowflake. He literally whines about being interrupted.

[–] mastefetri@infosec.pub 27 points 10 months ago

Gosh, how rude. Ashcroft wanted to ride out the clock with a gish gallop and the mean interviewer wouldn't let him. What happened to journalistic standards?

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Why would Rolling Stone link to Shitter rather than directly to the CNN interview?

They are enabling their oppressor

Edit: I tried to post the clip from CNN. After it hanging because it was stuck on the pop ups to allow it to track me even off their site and requests to push non stop ads to my cell phone in the middle of meetings and dinner I gave up.

There has to be a way.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Oh no, not SCRUTINY!! GOPs kryptonite.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

‘What’s your legal argument?’

‘Your honour, it’s the perennial argument of I’m Rubber, You’re Glue, as put forth in the case of Billy vs Jimmy in the schoolyard, 1954. The teacher in that case argued that Billy was, in fact, glue…’

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago

Pandering to his #fascist supporters.

[–] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Melting down is the new "slammed."

load more comments
view more: next ›