this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
523 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38750 readers
2622 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 107 points 9 months ago

oh man, i wonder how many just dont know

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 69 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sorry ladies, they are a little busy growing sunflowers right now.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago

How nice of them to take up gardening

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 55 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think they’re coming home even if (and most likely) dead

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Isn’t it like 350k deployed and 315k dead? Those are insane numbers.

Edit: 315k killed and wounded… not sure of the ratio

[–] space@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Afaik, it's 315k casualties, not deaths, which basically means "unable to serve". This includes dead, injured, captured, deserted etc. Also keep in mind that this is an Ukrainian estimate which might be inflated.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The ratio is almost always 3:1 in all cases. And I think the US has corroborated Ukrainian numbers very closely in the past, so it's probably a fair guess that 100k Russians have died.

[–] MethodicalSpark@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I thought in Ukraine it was closer to 2:1 due to poor Russian medical training and supplies.

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

3:1 of 315k is 80k deaths

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

351k according to today's numbers, crossed 350 two days ago.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Is that always how casualty is defined??? I had no idea

[–] space@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

TIL. Thanks for the power up!

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I remember being surprised when I learned that casualty does not necessarily mean fatality. I think it’s a common misunderstanding.

[–] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

basically means "unable to serve". This includes dead, injured, captured, deserted etc.

Ah, I didn't know that. I now envision it sometimes going like:
"Poor Steve, a casualty of war."
"What do you mean, he snuck back home and is watching TV in his mom's basement!"

[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago

The accuracy of these numbers is always going to be debatable and the true numbers likely never known but this is what Ukraine is saying what Russian losses are like

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I can't believe we had a Cold War with those guys.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

USSR =/= Russian Federation.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they both have/had rampant corruption and cronyism, so they aren't actually that different. Russia just stopped pretending to be communist.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I think they are referring to the relative societal priority of maintaining a large modern fighting force. USSR was investing and developing bleeding edge weapons tech. Russia has just been sitting on that same stockpile.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

The Soviet Union included a dozen nations not held by Russia today (one of whom was Ukraine), and Russia has suffered rampant corruption and neglect since the fall of the union 30 years ago

[–] mochisuki@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

What we had was an excuse to spend unlimited money on weapons, destabilizing anti-business foreign governments, and demonizing unions and social programs.

[–] loomi@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Putin confirmed 300,000 in a speech about a week ago.

[–] helmet91@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if he sends those women to the frontline as well.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

"But I had a husband!"

"IS CAT NOW!"

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Good luck with that. They’re not coming back.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh, they will... as sunflowers in the fields of Ukraine.

[–] lovesickoyster@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I heard russians make excellent fertilizer.

[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

Don't worry, no one is special cuz before long, a decade tops, everyone dies.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

This is what happened during their Afghanistan. The women started protesting.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yep and to try and prevent that this time they drew disproportionate numbers from the arse end of nowhere. Hopefully we hit some kind of tipping point soon.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I think that might be a double edged sword. They aren't central to the country, sure, but being more remote also makes it easier for them to take and hold territory in a rebellion.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

As far as I know it's not that they have just now started demanding this, it's that now their demands have been blatantly and openly ignored and handwaved away. The frustration is really high already.

I heard some people believe this to be a tipping point but I am afraid to believe that this will affect anything

[–] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago

we'll know if the tipping point is reached because it'll be violent. This isn't violent

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Tipping point: like that tipping point which led to a military coup? Heh. That didn't go anywhere. What happened to them again?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

I also don't know what realistically may happen to change things

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Even if they came back, they’ll never be the same

[–] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 9 months ago

I'm pretty sure Putin doesn't have the power to bring back the dead, but wishful thinking tho Russian women.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No husband! Only Khlav Khlash!

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's a fictional kebab-style food from The Simpson's cartoon.

[–] wwaxen@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's a bit salty, what would you recommend to drink?

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

We have Mountain Dew and Crab Juice.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Good luck with that. Not something Putin wants.

[–] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

Very sad. Poor oppressed Russian woman cries

[–] qwertyWarlord@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Putin: "Niet"

load more comments
view more: next ›