this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
211 points (93.4% liked)

News

23030 readers
3929 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] protist@mander.xyz 75 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The stock market has been decoupled from the real economy for years. There are interests who want all of us to make sacrifices when the stock market goes down, but I don't agree with them.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah they are always warning about the stock market and what we need to do to make it go up but most people don't even own stock. Maybe in their 401k if they have one. Other than that the average person probably doesn't care. I hardly even look at my 401k either. Let it tank I don't care. I'll probably work until I die anyways.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.one -2 points 10 months ago

Would Biden break an Occupy like Obama did?

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago

Honestly, these researchers could have saved themselves some work and simply looked at the current income disparity to come to the same conclusion ...

[–] N0body@sh.itjust.works 58 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The crash is very much a part of the cycle. The rich siphon every single dollar they can during boom times, then increase their market share by buying out smaller, struggling competitors during crashes. And they use taxpayer money to fund their acquisitions.

The class war is over. We lost a long time ago.

[–] delaunayisation@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's not over as long as the working class exists. Capital owners have addresses.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Last I checked, billionaires are still made of soft, fragile meat.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 10 months ago

Have you not seen Elysium? There's a reason Bezos and Musk have been running space programs as a hobby.

[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I have learned over the past 15 years that online liberal grumblers will find any excuse imaginable to avoid actually doing anything to defend themselves.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've lived through a whole dark age and three supposed end of days with the stock market.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I was working with Lehman Brothers when they went bankrupt.

Watching the collapse of a major investment bank from the inside is an interesting experience.

Still have one of their plexiglass desk cubes listing "Our values", which always brings an ironic smile to my face whenever I see it.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It didn't really collapse. Your CEO walked out the door with over 600 million dollars for a single year of work.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Both things can be true at the same time.

Also we wasn't "my" CEO as I was a freelancer working with them, not an employee, and even if I had been the latter it would still not have been "my" CEO because Lehman wasn't some kind of cooperative were workers got to chose upper management.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No they can't both be true. Companies that collapse do not have literal billions to give away. Corporate bankruptcy is not the same as personal bankruptcy. Personal bankruptcy you are going to spend the next 8 years eating ramen. Corporate bankruptcy is more like "I don't think I should have to work anymore but should still have money".

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's how it should be, not how it is.

Most institutions that go bankrupt have lots of assets, it's just that they have even more debts, and debt has various levels of seniority with the most senior debt payed first from whatever assets the company has, then if any assets are left the next more senior debt paid from them and so on until there are no more assets, and whomever was holding the more junior debt gets nothing (and stockholders are even more junior than any debt, so they usally get nothing).

There are tons of ways to take advantage of such a system (this being the fishy part) some of which are legal (so, even more fishy), and this being a large financial institution (who generally specialize in exactly playing the money game, including tax evasion, avoidance and all sorts of shennenigans) I'm almost sure the compensation for the CEO was made to be senior enough in the debt heirarchy that it ended up high enough that there was still money left from the sale of the company's assets after covering any debt that was even senior to it, to pay for it.

The Finance Industry is a complete total swamp, a politically endorsed swamp even, which is partly why I'm not working in the Industry anymore.

[–] exploding_whale@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

I pulled an old free frisbee out of a box of toys my mom had saved to find it was WaMu branded. Had a little chuckle at the free plastic frisbee outliving them.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is that the one where the values were on the other side of a Venn diagram without anything in the overlap?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Bunch of text with even a Mission Statement on one side of the cube.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair."

- A Tale of Two Cities

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I prefer A Sale of Two Titties

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I would be really worried about that if I were in the investor class. Then again, I wouldn't like myself very much, so I'm glad I'm not.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're never worried. An economic downturn is just an opportunity to them.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago

And what's the worst that can happen to them? "Oh no, instead of having 2 villas I will only be left with 1?"

Chances are they already can choose to not work for the rest of their lives. They will never get into a worse position than the average worker already is in.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If there are two classes which are top priority for "rescuing" with public money, is Financiers and Wealthy Investors.

It's the small fry that needs to worry, as invariably they're the ones left holding the bag whenever a way overstreched Economy and associated La-la-Land of Rainbows & Ponies Stockmarket finally get pulled back by the reality that there is nowhere near enough real value in total to justifiy the total value implied by all those sky-high asset prices.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So many people's retirements are in the stock market. This would screw over a ton of the working class too.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is by design. Retirements are more and more tied with risky markets because then the rich can hold everyone else hostage since it's not just them feeling the pain of a market crash. The insanity has to stop at some point or we're all going to be held hostage forever. Regardless, the amount that most individuals actually have is little and often isn't enough to actually retire on anyway.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What's the out that doesn't see you screaming backwards thanks to inflation?

[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Safer investments like bonds used to be the way, but were subdued by near zero interest rates for so long.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

So feudalism it is then?

We've seen this one before - can we skip past the decades of oppression and bloody revolt, and straight back to worker enfranchisement and something resembling a civilised, free, meritocratic society please?

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It did to me, because I have a locked-in pension from a former union job and after I quit I transferred it to my bank ... who proceeded to tell me I had no choice but to put it into stocks. As of rn it's finally back up to what I had in 2008.

I fucking hate the stock market.

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I mean technically if you have a retirement fund you are probably invested.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Would a crash lower house prices?

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Depending on why it crashed, it might in some areas to some extent. It might also motivate a drop in rates which could cause prices to start spiking upwards. The biggest issue with house prices is supply has been constrained since the GFC, there hasn't been enough housing built to meet demand. Until that changes I wouldn't expect house prices to ever decline significantly or over a sustained period of time.

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

this last sugar rush was nuts, I'm still bearish but refuse to play anything. S&P chart looks like a meme stock.

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Is it edging before bed or ?

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I fuckin this thumbnail

Edit: going over some old comments of mime, and I have no clue what I was trying to say here.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -2 points 10 months ago