this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
379 points (98.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7211 readers
560 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Murfreesboro, Tennessee, is already beginning to implement the law.


A city in Tennessee is using a recently passed ordinance essentially prohibiting homosexuality in public to try to ban library books that might violate the new rules.

Murfreesboro passed an ordinance in June banning “indecent behavior,” including “indecent exposure, public indecency, lewd behavior, nudity or sexual conduct.” As journalist Erin Reed first reported, this ordinance specifically mentions Section 21-72 of the city code. The city code states that sexual conduct includes homosexuality.

Anyone who violates the new ordinance is barred from hosting public events or selling goods and services at public events for two years. Anyone who violates the ordinance “in the presence of minors” is barred for five years.

An ACLU-backed challenge to the ordinance has already been launched, but that hasn’t stopped city officials from implementing the measure. Last Monday, the Rutherford County steering committee met to discuss removing all books that might potentially violate the ordinance from the public library. The resolution was met with widespread outcry from city residents.

“When have the people who ban books ever been the good guys?” local activist Keri Lambert demanded during the Monday county meeting.

Murfreesboro city officials have already used the ordinance to ban four books that discuss LGBTQ themes. In August, the county library board pulled the books Flamer, Let’s Talk About It, Queerfully and Wonderfully Made, and This Book Is Gay.

The board also implemented a new library card system that categorizes books into certain age groups. When it takes effect next year, children and teenagers will only be able to check out books that correspond to their age group; they will need permission from a parent or guardian to check out “adult” books.

Library director Rita Shacklett worried in August that the new rules would prevent students from accessing books they need for a class. She explained that many classic high school books, such as To Kill a Mockingbird, are now classified as “adult.”

It’s unclear if the county steering committee plans to pull books such as the A Song of Ice and Fire series, which includes multiple depictions of heterosexual sexual conduct.

Murfreesboro’s new ordinance is part of a much larger wave of attacks on LGBTQ rights in Tennessee and the rest of the country. In the past year, the so-called Volunteer State became the first state to try to ban drag performances. That law was overturned in court.

In March, the Tennessee House of Representatives passed a bill that would allow people to refuse to perform a marriage if they disagree with it, essentially gutting marriage equality. The bill was introduced in the Senate but deferred until next year.

link: https://newrepublic.com/post/176915/tennessee-town-ban-public-homosexuality

archive link: https://archive.ph/LFMMK

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tammo-Korsai@kbin.social 110 points 1 year ago (26 children)

When it takes effect next year, children and teenagers will only be able to check out books that correspond to their age group; they will need permission from a parent or guardian to check out “adult” books.

Will the bible be in the adult section? It's full of every kind of smut and crime you can think of.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it should be at the top of the 'banned' list for content.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nah, it just needs to be in fiction where it and the quran belong.

At least until people stop treating it like truth and start treating it strictly anthropologically. It's a fascinating book to analyze secularly.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's a fascinating book to analyze secularly.

Is it though? I've seen atheists say this to theists to make them feel like they got some kind of win or something.

But let's be real, it's shit. The stories are shit. The characters are shit. It isn't even internally consistent. It's an objectively shitty book.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, it's fascinating to ANALYZE secularly, not to read secularly. It's fascinaing anthropologically. It is NOT good literature.

I'm not going to call cave paintings high art, but they are fascinating to study for some.

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The Song of Solomon was deadass my first exposure to erotic writing

"And their emissions were kin to that of donkeys" or some shit

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Feidry@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh man, I wish I still lived in Murfreesboro. I'm straight as could be but you better believe I'd find a buddy to kiss and hug in public just to piss off those backwards fuckwits.

[–] cabbagee@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Family member of the same gender? Time to hold hands everywhere we go...

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Could make Murfreesboro the gayest town in America!

[–] DaDragon@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Ah yes, America, the land of freedom and of the free!

Freedom to be free from people you dislike, it seems…

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The lesson here is that Murfreesboro hates America, despises freedom, shits on the soldiers who gave their lives for this country and pisses all over their graves. They have wiped their asses with the American flag and flushed it into the sewer. They are traitors of the highest order and should be treated as such.

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

me when I crank the no true scotsman to 11

Yeah that tracks.

That place sucks, and so does MTSU.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How the fuck do you bar someone from a town in the United States? Are they going to build checkpoints?

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's happened before. See: sundown towns in Jim Crow south.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ReallyKinda@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Anyone who violates the new ordinance is barred from hosting public events or selling goods and services at public events for two years. Anyone who violates the ordinance “in the presence of minors” is barred for five years.

Sounds like it’s not a local border situation, probably more to do with city permits. Insane in 2023. Reminds me of the vagrancy laws.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

no, the town will just quit investigating the murders until the undesirables get the message

[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Of course this would be how my town makes the news...

[–] WIIHAPPYFEW@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

The only thing I knew y’all for before is that Strong Bad liked the sound of your town’s name

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 22 points 1 year ago

I just want to say that those are some bitchin book titles. Now I want to read them.

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

There is a reason Red Dead Redemption 2 has a clan of inbred folks called the Murfree brood.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I’m sure it’s one of those things where a woman in a string bikini would be fine, but a guy in pink silver hot pants and a rainbow mesh shirt isn’t.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do people in those states just have nothing better to do? Like get a hobby and stop thinking about other people's sex lives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theostermanweekend@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

What the fuck, man?!

[–] GarfieldYaoi@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

They get elected, and then expect the taxpayers to subsidize laws they know are unconstitutional. Leftists give money to lawyers and then have less to contribute to elections.

load more comments
view more: next ›