this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
57 points (89.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26401 readers
992 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For me its got to me Mozart and Bach.

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Tchaikovsky. Currently listening to Borodin though.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Ling-ling! (violin) David Fray (pianist)

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Bach, definitely.

I don't care for later composers; I love the elegant-yet-complex structure of early/ier music and I have yet to find anyone who can explain to me precisely what I mean by that.

I have a huge mental blind spot when it comes to music theory; I don't understand a damn thing about it and likely never will, so I can't put this in actual smart-people words.

But Bach (along with a number of earlier composers) sounds immensely fucking clever, like he's carrying on a conversation on three different levels at once, and somehow doing counterpoint down the timeline instead of across it, even with an unaccompanied cello.

Whereas your beethovens and mozarts of the world seem to use ten times as much sound and fury, or ten times as many twiddly bits... to say very little at all. If you boiled out all the redundancy, all the structures would collapse and you'd have nothing left over.

If anyone knows what the fuck I'm talking about and is able to translate, I'll be eternally grateful.

[–] Entropywins@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Bach was a baroque composer, you are hearing the difference between baroque and classical music. You are getting at counterpoint used in baroque and homophony used in classical composition. Counterpoint has multiple independent but interrelated voices or musical lines going at once and homophony is basically the opposite where all voices or musical lines move together in a harmonic progression.

I'm super impressed with what you recognize I've had to do some digging and reading to even start to hear what you picked up on naturally.

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm not just talking about counterpoint, though. (funny story, my introduction to baroque and early music started after I went frantically searching for counterpoint after seeing an old Ethel Merman movie on TV as a kid.)

Counterpoint is all brain-tickly, but the real payoff for me is... uhh. Patterns that are obvious in retrospect, but weirdly hard to predict ahead, given how simple they are. You can get this all the way back to plainchant, and the more basic the construction, the more impressive it is.

Conversely, once you scrape off all the drama and fussy bits off most classical composers, you're left with something very basic indeed. You pull the ends, and for all its loopy squiggling, it doesn't actually make a knot.

Meh. I not words good. There's a concept there, but I lack the tools to reason about it.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No, I do understand what you mean and it's the same thing I like about the baroque music. It's almost like modern house music, the kind where they take one riff and play it out fifty different ways, it is sort of trancey and doesn't yell at you for attention, it pulls instead of pushing.

[–] teft@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

I thought your very basic indeed video would be the pachelbel rant.

[–] cleanandsunny@literature.cafe 2 points 11 months ago

I get what you’re saying! Never was great at music theory either, but Bach indeed uses a lot of techniques in his composing to create the layers you’re referring to, where there is clarity but complexity. Sometimes it’s a melody mirrored or reversed, sometimes it’s the way themes repeat across and within parts, sometimes it’s a well timed key change, but there’s an often mathematical approach to the composition that you don’t find in other composers (or at least, done as well). I find Bach to be a bit boring to play, but it’s like violin comfort food lol.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There's a reason Bach is on Voyager's golden record 3 times.

[–] teft@startrek.website 6 points 11 months ago

Vivaldi and Erik Satie

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Shostakovich, particularly his 7th (The Leningrad) Symphony which will always have a special place in my heart.

[–] Entropywins@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Recently listened Shostakovich for the first time a couple months ago and it was amazing!

[–] cleanandsunny@literature.cafe 5 points 11 months ago

Shostakovich, Dvorak, Stravinsky, Rachmaninoff, Tchaikovsky…I guess I have a thing for the Eastern Europeans, lol. I’m a violinist and idk how to explain it really, but it’s like the Eastern European composers understand the feel of the instrument better. Or maybe the way I play is just more aligned with that style. Either way, I find their pieces are more fun and dynamic (and sometimes, also challenging) to play.

[–] Ryan213@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Bach - Brandenburg Concertos (esp. #3) Vivaldi - Four Seasons (Spring) Mozart - Eine Kleine Nachtmusik Howard Shore - Concerning Hobbits

Pretty standard/popular pieces, I think, but I like what I like! LOL

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Beethoven was a badass. Fucker was deaf and still wrote bangers like the Moonlight Sonata.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Has to be Debussy and Chopin for me.

[–] Castob@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Same for me and I would add Eric Satie on that list.

[–] lorez@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Rachmaninoff and Beethoven probably.

[–] aesopjah@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] lorez@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Which piece is your fav from him? I'm still exploring classical.

[–] clover@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Shubert's Erl Koenig, Beethoven's Pathetique, Moussorgsky's Promenade. But I'm also a huge metal fan so I like a little drama.

[–] LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Erl Koenig is basically a black metal song 200 years early, and I love it

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Tchaikovsky was Victorian rock music.

A few years ago I unexpectedly got into French baroque music after hearing some Jean-Baptiste Lully. Mainly overtures and dances and te-deums. This stuff is great! Melodies catchy as hell, rhythms much more accessible than classical and romantic music. It's from 350 years ago! Just listen to a compilation, the pieces are all pretty short and accessible.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I always felt like Beethoven rocked pretty hard too.

[–] ImpossibilityBox@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure I have a favorite composer because it really depends on what mood I'm in.

That being said, Requiem Lacrimosa by Mozart is the greatest piece of music in history.

[–] llamapocalypse@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Igor Stravinsky, Chris Rouse, Alfred Schnittke, Witold Lutoslawski, and Gustav Mahler are probably my top 5 composers.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 3 points 10 months ago

Nothing rocks like Beethoven!

Well, the flight of the bumble bee by Rimsky Korsakof is also completely hardcore gold.

The four seasons by Vivaldi and the toccata and fugue in D minor by Bach are master pieces too IMO.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 11 months ago

My favourite living composer is probably Elena Kats-Chernin.

Favourite dead composer is definitely Beethoven, but I’ve been getting very into Shostakovich lately.

[–] goodgame@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

For me, Handel: Mozart is reputed to have said of him, "Handel understands affect better than any of us. When he chooses, he strikes like a thunder bolt."[159] To Beethoven he was "the master of us all... the greatest composer that ever lived. I would uncover my head and kneel before his tomb."[159]

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Entropywins@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Liszt was a boss

[–] BanjoShepard@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Not truly classical, but Copland is my go to. For a single work, I could listen to Dvork's 9th forever.

[–] dipbeneaththelasers@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago
[–] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

i would definitely go for Scriabin

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Oh yeah? Name three of their songs.

[–] Bonifratz@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

If I had to name just one, it would always be Satie, simply because I admire how he did his own thing completely and basically composed some sort of minimalism a century before it was cool. Others I love (to name just a few): Saint-Saëns, Debussy, Schubert, Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninoff, late Mozart. More recently I've been a fan of Messiaen for his harmonic style and of Schnittke for his versatility and humour (and sometimes breathtakingly beautiful pieces). If we're talking musicians (not composers), I'd name Alicia de Larrocha, Maria João Pires and Sviatoslav Richter for piano, and Isaac Stern for violin.

[–] LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

I'm a lover of the romantics. I don't have any one favorite, but I like me my Liszt, Brahms, Chopin, Mussorgsky, Schubert. Not that I don't like others. Mozart, though not a romantic, is one of my favorites

[–] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Debussey and Beethoven

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago

Not a composer but a musician, Chris Thiel. Amazing mandolin player.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Bach, and Arvo Part.

The baroque music, it is just so melodic and pleasant. That I guess is not strictly classical, nor is Part but I'm interpreting your question as Orchestral music from any time period.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 2 points 10 months ago

I know it's a cop out answer, but Mozart was a genius among geniuses. He can make an extremely complex piece of music sound so simple that anyone, even a non musician, can appreciate it. There are so many layers to how complex it is, but if you just listen to the melody, it almost sounds trivial.

Those are the artists that I like most. Artists that can make art that both artists and nonartists can equally appreciate.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago
[–] thelsim@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Ralph Vaughan Williams, his “Fantasia on a Theme by Thomas Tallis” gives me goosebumps every time I hear it.
If anyone can recommend anything similar, I would love to hear from you :)

[–] TheSpermWhale@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Mozart and Bach are classics, alongside Beethoven and vivaldi of course. I also quite enjoy holst, Dvorak, liszt and Rachmanninov

[–] godofpainTR@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I alternate between Ravel, Rachmaninoff and Prokofiev lately

[–] Entropywins@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sibelius violin concerto in d minor op.47

Rachmaninoff piano concerto no.2 and prelude in c sharp minor op.3 no.2
The first part of his piano concerto is just perfection and only gets better

John Cage 4'33" is a very interesting piece for those into modern minimalist compositions

[–] Shinzid@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I absolutely love Chopin. His pieces are so chopiny. I find his piano pieces are so incredibly fun to play and a great listen too. Sometimes when I try to play them it makes no sense to me, but eventually something clicks and somehow I'm playing one of the most beautiful pieces I've ever played.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Vivaldi, Chopin, Mozart and Bach, in that order. Honorable mentions for Grieg, Tchaikovsky and Debussy.

[–] MonsieurArchi@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Barrios and Tarrega!