243
Republicans are now mad that Pete Buttigieg drives his family around in a minivan
(www.lgbtqnation.com)
Any non Republican: breathes
GOP: 😡
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
243 points (96.2% liked)
politics
19144 readers
5938 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It's because he's gay and homosexuality is a moral choice. Did that piss you off? Read on...
Credit where due, the Republicans knocked it out the park with the whole, "Anyone non-cis is an active pedophile or grooming a target!"
They kinda got fucked using gays as a wedge issue. Worked in its time, but once gays started coming out the closet en masse, and we collectively realized they were nothing to be afraid of, meh, the hate fell off the charts. Losing this issue was alarming as hell! Best they could do was drop gay rights in the culture-war bucket. Liberals and conservatives alike found the water rather tepid.
Now I don't think there was any sort of organized, cartoonish, "evil master plan", but conservatives saw they were getting attention with the groomer talk, and it snowballed, fast. Target reacquired! And man, what a perfect target. Go after a minority that the rest of us can't emotionally relate to, even given zero problems with homosexuality, and who could be anybody!
To back up the truck, remember they went after trans folks to begin this new pogrom. An even tinier minority! And those people are grooming your kids into changing into something else, just like they did to themselves! Think of the children! LOL, it's some Invasion of the Body Snatchers kinda paranoia.
Seeing some outrage on social media? ROLL WITH IT.
This is all so easy if you frame non-cis people as having made a choice. Now you can point your finger and legitimately call them bad guys. This is Fascism 101. Minorities, out groups, focus of hatred, both powerful and weak, all that.
Liberals: "But, but, but... Facts and reason and ethics and morals are on our side!!!"
What if I told you; Emotions sell, facts do not. Sales 101, first day of class, before lunch kinda instruction.
Not going to appeal to the, "I'm old, therefore wiser than you." boolshit. But I've watched all this unfold over 5 decades. It really is this plain.
I don't know the answer, but Jesus, look at the tweets in the story. We're not winning hearts and minds by being logical, moral or right.
having made a choice
It's pretty hilarious that the celebrants of freedom use choice as grounds for persecution.
Now I don't think there was any sort of organized, cartoonish, "evil master plan", but conservatives saw they were getting attention with the groomer talk, and it snowballed, fast.
There's at least a tacit conspiracy between the right and Russian oligarchs to amplify this sort of messaging. It's why Elon bought Twitter and unbanned all the hate mongers.
Imagine trying to make the world's most boring politician controversial.
Ban gay people driving minivans! Wait a second, why are we fighting this?
Pete would probably be a top ten President of all time. Extremely smart, likeable, and handles himself well. He already is the best Transportation secretary in my lifetime, though the competition wasn't very strong.
I don't expect him to pass a purity test, I swear, but he was very pro insurance companies when he was running for prez. I suspect he already has a lucrative job lined up after being the transportation secretary. I prefer Swalwell running.
He worked for McKinsey already. He could go back to a much higher-paid position there.
I saw that on the John Oliver show too, yikes.
Pete would be an ok President. He is definitely aware of the politics around him and can leverage that to his favor. I just haven't seen the long term thinking you need in a President. Pete seems far more transactional for now.
Like that transaction when he traded Biden: drop out of the primary so voters would coalesce around Biden and away from Sanders in exchange for a cabinet seat. The 3rd 4th and 5th place candidates coming into Super Tuesday all announced within a few days they were dropping out and endorsing Biden.
He strikes me as a shrude pragmatist and I'm not a fan of that, nor of ex CIA agents going into executive politics.
He strikes me as more of a Manchurian Candidate than say and FDR, anyhow.
This comment just made me throw up in my mouth a little bit.
But I guess you know your….. checks notes….. transportation secretaries? The actual fuck. Did you really just say that this mumbling neoliberal corporate whore is the best transportation secretary in your lifetime?
How far up your ass did you have to reach to pull that bs statement out?
Ok but low-key, I hope the op has like, a 60 minute video ranking the last 50 years of transportation secretaries.
Obviously Alan S. Boyd would be the only S tier. Buittigeg would maybe get to B tier.
I mean if he did his research lol.
Come on now, Federico Peña has to at least make the top 5. Just kidding, I just chose him randomly.
Federico Peña
Let me guess you only watched the netflix adaptation and probably not even the sub.
:sheesh:
Everyone knows the real GOAT Transportation Secretary is the only one we know has fucked Mitch McConnell:
Elaine Chao
As someone following USDOT socials, it is crazy how much Pete has posted more than Elaine.
Okay mofo you wanna go there? Cuz I’ll take you there! You don’t know jack about transportation secretaries! You probably think light rail is something they have in Europe!
Oof. Unless he’s trying to make a pro union statement, I think he got the wrong van. I would never buy a Stellantis product. He should have gone with a Sienna or Odyssey
Up until a couple years ago, the Pacifica was the only hybrid available. The Sienna has a hybrid now. But that's it.
Mechanically, I agree with you. But the I think the Pacifica is the most luxurious
I'd never buy any Honda with the 3.5V6 with eco mode. At least not without also buying an aftermarket harness to disable eco mode.
It's a minivan, dude. You're already not buying it for the performance.
Honda eco mode shuts off one bank of cylinders in cruising and coasting conditions. In a very short period of time (60K miles for ours, I've seen reports of it happening earlier), those cylinders running without combustion will eat the piston rings. If you drive less aggressively, this happens sooner. Honda may or may not pay for the several thousand dollar repair, depending on which corporate warranty adjuster you happen to get.
There was already a class action for certain model years, with a TSB. But they didn't actually change anything about the design, so it does happen in any 3.5V6: Odyssey, Pilot, whatever.
That is horrifying. Do they still use the engine?
They made changes to the gen 5 (2018-2023) that fixed that particular issue.
Yup.
The older ones had problems with carbon buildup causing oil consumption because of the cylinder deactivation that's why many of the forums are filled with people disabling the vcm module
The newer ones, too.
Breaking news: GOP gets outraged by irrelevant issue on a weekday.
The Hellsite has hellions acting hellish for the hell of it.
Here’s Tom with the weather…
Of course they would be.