this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
181 points (95.9% liked)

Privacy

31790 readers
247 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yeah 12ft doenst seem to work on any sites anymore. Does anyone have any alternatives that work? I'm already familiar with the airplane mode trick but that's not always fit for purpose.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Time to dig out that 14ft ladder

[–] jsdz@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] danafest@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I use this on Firefox Mobile and desktop and it works great

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 5 points 1 year ago

This is the way. They also have adblock lists you can add directly to ublock/adguard

[–] variants@possumpat.io 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just copy the link to archive.org and read the archived page

[–] Nugelz@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago

So this doesn't work for wallstreet Journal pages unfortunately but does work for Natgeo! Thank you!

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago

That's one short ladder.

[–] lacarsi@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Bump for justice, ty

[–] skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] applejacks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

is there a difference between .ph and .is?

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes.

Edit: I answered the question. You guys have no chill.

[–] olicvb@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what is it? (other than "ph" or "is" in the url)

[–] skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Clearly you already know the difference /s

I have no idea, I just use and remember the one I linked above.

[–] moonmeow@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Try turning off JavaScript when ur faced with an overlaying paywall

[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, I haven't seen a paywall in years with javascript disabled by default.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Some websites circumvent this by only having one paragraph of the story loaded if you turn off JavaScript.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Try the serious properties, like Economist or FT. Their paywalls are hard.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The economist is a bad example lol.

Their site loads the content before it locks it down. So you can just reload the side and press reading mode before it removes it again.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If true, it's all but impossible to actually do this on a normal-speed connection. I had the impression they stopped this method a while ago.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’m going to get fired at for saying this, but websites like that are why I keep Brave around as a last resort news backup. Its reader mode didn’t get past FT, but easily did so for the Economist.

(I don’t need education about Brave, but readers can lodge their complaints and do the token rants right here 👇)

[–] Melody@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thanks, I’m aware, but afaik that is not an option on iOS mobile.

edit: just looked again and saw the brief blurb for iOS/iPadOS, will look into it further

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lots of sites just dont load anything w JS disabled. Nytimes for example

[–] moonmeow@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah..that happens, but from my experience it works a lot of times

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 15 points 1 year ago
[–] TarquinNimrod@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Add this to your custom filter list.

Bypass Paywalls Clean filter. Works for me with local papers and others like NYTimes etc.

[–] Nugelz@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do I add this to my Pi-hole?

[–] TarquinNimrod@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, no.. I meant in the settings in uBlock Origin, which you would already have installed as an addon in your browser of choice. Choose open dashboard, it opens at filter lists and down the bottom is 'Import', just below 'Custom'. Add the url to import, it'll do its thing and you'll have a new entry in 'Custom'. Sorry, don't know much about Pi-Holes.

[–] Nugelz@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh right! Already use Ublock will give this a go.

[–] TarquinNimrod@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

No prob! Coupled with zero ads, it's like it used to be back in the day, just.. well, an article with some images. Good luck!

[–] Melody@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The archive sites work great, even for WSJ articles. I just checked after I saw your comment saying archive.ph doesn't work for WSJ articles, and it works fine for archiving WSJ articles.

[–] Nugelz@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's cuts off the particular article I want to read, so seems like there is a word limit! Drat!

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which article? That is interesting, I haven't had that issue yet, but I just started using these archived pages a couple weeks ago so I'm curious about their limits

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Have you tried a different browser but still using the archive pages?

[–] glorious_albus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

12ft.io is a website that allows you to bypass paywalls on websites. Specifically for articles/news. The idea being “show me a 10ft wall and I’ll build a 12ft ladder.” It worked well against a lot of article and news outlet paywalls originally, but as time has gone on more and more sites are starting to show up on it as unable to bypass.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that we need 13ft.io

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

12ft1in.io

Go as small as possible so that our ladder only has to get slightly longer. Plus I’m petty.

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone besides US Americans won't understand imperial measurements

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Since there’s approximately 17,000 Subway Sandwich locations across 100 countries outside the United States I’m gonna say that most people can just imagine 12 (maybe 13 if we assume the 11in subway lawsuit) full size Subway Sandwiches stacked on top of each other.

[–] pragmakist@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

More than 400000 of us for each of those locations then, and how many of us have then bothered to wander in, I wonder?

Anyway, would you really trust an American company to actually make their sandwiches 1ft tall?

How would you even start to eat such a thing?

(Also most standardized feet are around 30 cm, so 12ft is ~ 3.6 m)

[–] Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I just went to 12ft.io and got the following message:

This Deployment has been disabled.

Your connection is working correctly.

Vercel is working correctly.

So I'm guessing the site is gone?

[–] moreeni@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Simple filterlists, by definition, only work for a short time. Maybe a specific userscript can help. There are also Extensions, which redirect to articles about the same content to sites without paywall, like Unpaywall do, which is maybe the best option.

In Firefox, to use userscripts, you need to install first an Userscript Manage, like Tampermonkey, Violentmonkey, etc. which you find in the Mozilla Store. In Vivaldi it isn't needed, simply download the script to a folder (don't delete it) and drag it to the Extension Page in Developer mode in the Browser, to install it directly as an extension.

[–] Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I saw this advice on an IG post (https://www.instagram.com/reel/CxBpKwrSblD/?igshid=MTc4MmM1YmI2Ng==).

This is for a desktop computer. I'm adding in the brackets what I believe are the actions they are taking in the IG video if you don't want to click the link:

"If you're on a website that's forcing you to log in, [right click over the article and select] Inspect Elements, highlight over [the page and select] Delete [and then select] Node."

I have not tried this myself. If you have clearer directions please reply to this comment!

[–] ItsGatorSeason@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

This works for some sites, but honestly it's easier using the Firefox reading mode on those sites, it basically does the same thing. It only works if the page loads the full articles text behind the pay wall popup which unfortunately not many do.