this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
412 points (97.7% liked)

Not The Onion

12272 readers
2546 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Says exec of company that has objectively caused more environmental harm to the world than any others

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 110 points 1 year ago (33 children)

Petrochemicals and the energy from fossil fuels did provide the needed food and energy to boost our standard of living.

HOWEVER

By the time we knew they were affecting the climate, we had the technology to move off of them and didn't because of assholes like this.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

The sad part is that he may be right because the urgency to transition off fossils is lost in our desire not to be inconvenienced. Don’t mention the bribes (some call them donations) to political parties, candidates and Supreme Court judges.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

They're not selling a product that's evil - they are evil.

Petrochemicals lack the agency required for moral culpability.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

we're not selling a product that is evil

Oh I get it. The oil isn't inherently evil. You are, both as a CEO and as a company! I agree, in fact. If we left the oil safely in the earth, there'd be nothing evil about it.

[–] Murais@lemmy.one 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're selling Earth blood that makes the sky melt.

That's pretty fucking evil.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget the brown people that die in the name of oil or propping up dictatorships like Saudi Arabia

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well I for one want to know how my oil got under their land. Why is no one asking these important questions?

[–] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

“We’re not selling an evil product, we’re just running a multibillion dollar cartel in an evil way. That’s totally different.”

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

We don't profit off of suffering, we provide it for free!

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Plastic in the oceans, Co2 and heavy metals in the air, war, and above all: Wednesday morning traffic (worst day where I am due to WFH rules still being decently widespread).

Looks like someone needs a bullet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oil isn't evil. Oil has many uses outside of being burned for energy, and once we transition away from fossil fuels entirely there will still be a place for oil companies.

This isn't what he meant, of course, but hopefully his successor will understand that and make the pivots necessary for the company to survive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So basically fraud in service of destroying our only planet on the way to making a gajillion dollars. Fair enough, so we extract enough of that money to reverse the catastrophic harm they have done.

[–] hogunner@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I hope you’re right but I fear it may be a Humpty Dumpty situation.

[–] deezbutts@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I bet we don't even have to baste him he's so greasy

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Well yeah - it's not an evil product. As an inanimate object, it can't possess a moral quality.

Moral qualities are only rightly assigned to conscious beings - like, for example, corporate CEOs.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice mental gymnastics. That’s the name of the game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Gosh, these guys really are following the big tobacco playbook, huh?

"Oil isn't evil, it's just a material, it doesn't have will or consciousness."

He's right of course, the oil itself isn't forcing anyone to use it. It's the decades of collaboration between the fossil fuel lobby and the government that's entrenched our fossil fuel dependent infrastructure, along with the resolute refusal of all fossil fuels companies to turn their backs on making as much money as they possibly can right this instant (because smart long term growth is illegal, brain dead quarterly growth is now my friend) and make good on their promises to pivot their energy portfolios.

In so many words, oil isn't evil, but the people running the oil companies are.

[–] neanderthal@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

At this point, now that their are viable alternatives (Renewables, Geothermal, Nuclear) and ways to drastically reduce their usage (War on Cars), oil should be a niche product for airplanes and construction vehicles. Large ocean cargo ships could be nuclear powered, although it would probably raise the cost of building the ships and the crew. As far as ships go, not everything needs to be shipped from the other side of the world.

[–] people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

By better you mean aiding in killing off most higher life forms and ocean life?

load more comments
view more: next ›