this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
567 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

56365 readers
5629 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Too narrow, hidden, minimal feedback...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LilDestructiveSheep@lemmy.world 88 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lots of people who are designing websites and webapps are just out for the design. Usability went in the background for whatever reason.

But more and more people are getting more aware of user friendly UI and functions for people with disabilities. But yet it's not the highest priority sadly.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

for whatever reason

Flashy sleek shit gets invested in.

Outside of business specifically oriented towards people with accessibility issues, the energy just doesn't translate into VC.

Companies who do try to shoehorn it in when products are more mature usually have:

  1. A codebase with a frustrating amount of refactoring in order to retroactively get things in line.

  2. Development inertia where it's seen as a low value activity among developers and product owners

  3. Lack of clear guidance/tools/processes to QA new work

  4. Lack of will to retroactively identify the breadth and scope of changes you even want to make

There is no mystery. It's not going to get you sexy VC money at the beginning, and then it's bizarrely more work than you'd think once your project is sufficiently large.

[–] Alatain@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't explain why already established products are ditching things like plainly visible scroll bars in products like Microsoft word and other content viewers.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's true. I can speak from experience how I've seen it go down in many products, but no idea what apple and Microsoft are thinking.

It's bizarre, because usually at some point in size, companies will start to explicitly have accessibility UAT processes. Even directorship roles specifically with that responsibility

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

It’s bizarre, because usually at some point in size, companies will start to explicitly have accessibility UAT processes. Even directorship roles specifically with that responsibility

I used to be a programmer for a large cable company (rhymes with "bombast") and at one point I was the only programmer there working on accessibility in all their mobile products. The executives there at all levels had a shocking contempt for accessibility as something to even be concerned about at all and it showed in the disastrous state of all their apps. The only reason they even began to address the problem was the threat of million-dollars-per-month fines from the FCC for all the accessibility audit failures. They even hired a blind guy as accessibility VP but he quit in despair over the corporate lack of concern after just a few months.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 71 points 9 months ago (6 children)

And just straight up broken by idiocy like infinite scroll.

[–] zeddiq@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would imagine the same designer who implements infinite scroll would also design bad scrollbars

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I recently had to talk a designer out of implementing a “webpage progress indicator” that was a thin horizontal bar across the top of the page that filled in as you progressed through the content.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A few pages have those. What don't you like about them?

[–] Jesus_666@feddit.de 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They are bad replicas of school bars. Except you can't use these to scroll the page and they use horizontal progress to express vertical progress. Everything they do could be done more effectively by having a visible scroll bar.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zerofk@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago

Most fun are the infinite scroll pages with a footer.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

links that are only modal floater windows drive me insane too. this isn't anything! make a website!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago (3 children)

People with dexterity and hand control challenges have a difficult time with these skinny scroll bars.

I have neither dexterity nor hand control challenges and I still find it incredibly hard to grab those skinny scroll bars.

One additional design "feature" I really despise is auto hiding scroll bars. So then to visually see when I am I have to scroll up and down to bring it back.

And web designers that do that stupid scroll hijacking where scrolling "stops" and then things move around for a bit should be launched into the sun. It's the most anti-UX design I've ever seen. It's literally the same as temporarily causing your mouse cursor to move in the opposite direction of input and then calling it a "design feature".

Imagine if each application on your computer arbitrarily changed up the direction your mouse cursor moves. It's literally the same thing. Computer input should be 100% predictable and reliable. The instant you do that it makes the computer/program/website feel sluggish and inoperative.

[–] TwanHE@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

That scroll hijacking legit feels like getting stunned in call of duty or something, suddenly your mouse just doesn't want to do what you tell it to.

[–] atetulo@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Just more examples of modern designers creating shit to stay relevant.

I hate modern design. We had good design up until the mid-2000s, then it all started going to shit.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deleted@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I am sick of modern minimalist UI where functionality is not a priority.

I always prefer win32 applications for this reason.

[–] Jesus_666@feddit.de 25 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Heck, I even prefer the ultra-skeuomorphic textured-everything approach of Mountain Lion-era OS X over the current ultra-minimalist approach where everything is either a hairline or a big flat monocolored shape.

It actually makes it harder to parse the UI when a button, a text field, a label, and a random part of the window can look exactly the same. I'd rather take a file manager that tries to look like a 1980s hifi stereo.

Or you know, a reasonable middle ground.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Iamdanno@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Form follows function! Not the other way around!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

But if we show a full-sized scrollbar all the time, we lose all that space that we could have left completely empty otherwise!

Yeah, losing function over form is annoying.

[–] weeahnn@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

I love it when scrollbars are like, half an atom wide. Makes it easy to use the website.

[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I would like my scroll bars back please. Scroll wheel on a mouse is not enough. Neither is a fling gesture on touchpad or screen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What the fuck is it with apps just making the scrollbar completely hidden until you scroll with the mouse or keyboard? Microsoft seems like the biggest offender with this. It’s so irritating, they’ve got more than enough space to just keep it around all the time, it’s what I’m expecting to find there, hiding it just makes more annoyed each time. It’s not as bad if you’re using a mouse with a scroll wheel, but on a laptop with a trackpad it’s beyond annoying.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I assume it's part of a trend of having as much useless white space as possible, so that they can stuff more ads into it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] atetulo@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (12 children)

I call it the "War on Scrollbars" and I think it started when some meme about watching a teacher use a computer got popular. https://old.reddit.com/r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu/comments/df8cd/watching_someone_use_a_computer/

I absolutely hate how tiny scrollbars have gotten. I hate how clicking in a certain spot cause the scrollbar to move slightly instead of jumping directly to where I click.

These are modern design decisions that I think shitty designers implemented because they need to feel useful. Then, autistic users who want nothing on their screen praise them for it.

It's disgusting and I hope, one day, we can look back on how the 2010s were the worst decade for software design so far.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Then, autistic users who want nothing on their screen praise them for it

What does autism have to do with scrollbars?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It could be that websites are being made unbearable, to pressure users into switching to the site's mobile apps, which are generally spyware. I can't stand looking at homedepot.com on a phone, for example. Even if I don't look at the screen, I can feel the phone warming up in my hand as the crapware javascript on the site drains the phone battery.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eudaimonia@lemmy.ml 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I feel you, so I have researched this:

For Firefox you can change the width /style of the scrollbar:

(A) In a new tab, type or paste

about:config

in the address bar and press Enter/Return. Click the button accepting the risk.

(B) In the search box in the page, type or paste

widget.non-native-theme.scrollbar.style

(C) Press the Return or Enter key to find the setting. Click the Edit (pencil) button on the right side of the widget.non-native-theme.scrollbar.style setting.

(D) Delete the current 0 value for the default OS style scrollbar. Then input the value 1 (Mac OS X), 2 (GTX), 3 (Android), 4 (Windows 10), or 5 (Windows 11) in the widget.non-native-theme.scrollbar.style box for the scrollbar style you want to change to. For example, enter 4 to change the scrollbar to the default Windows 10 design.

(E) Click the Save button on the right side of the widget.non-native-theme.scrollbar.style setting to apply.

Also for the hiding:

Windows: Settings > Ease of Access > Display > Automatically hide scroll bars in Windows

Mac: System Preferences > General > Show scroll bars

[–] helmet91@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I have a broken scroll wheel (which happens every 5-10 years, whenever the lifecycle of my mouse reaches its end), and I feel the pain every freakin time I wanna scroll.

Nowadays with such high-resolution screens I just can't understand why it's needed to make those scrollbars so narrow.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] varogen@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

For a while I was playing video games with a mouse that had a broken scroll wheel. Some games just don't even implement a scroll bar at all... So you have to hold down the arrow keys to go through each item. So infuriating.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So, to tl;dr the article: size does matter

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

It's not the length of the scrollbar, it's how you use it (and also girth)

[–] Fisch@lemmy.ml 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I like the way GTK is doing it. You have a thin scrollbar that is overlayed over the content and has no background (so just the knob) but when you get near it with the mouse, the background appears and it becomes double as thick. That way you're not wasting any space but you don't have this issue of it being hard to use either.

[–] atetulo@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Am I the only one who never considered normal scrollbars to be a 'waste of space'?

It's surprising to me how modern designers seem to care about scrollbars, but not all the white space we see on everything else.

[–] GoosLife@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Minimalist design really went from "maybe 38 different clickable links isn't the most optimal way to get around this site, we should probably optimize how we use screen space" to "WE MUST GET RID OF USEFUL FEATURES SO WE CAN DISPLAY 5-8 MORE PIXELS OF WHITESPACE" in the span of a decade lol

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

X buttons are another problem, light grey and fucken 10% opacity on a white background and the target is right in the middle of the intersect.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Johanno@feddit.de 12 points 9 months ago

Even using pc all day I can't click a scroll bar on the first time!

[–] jcdenton@lemy.lol 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Overlay scrollbars. Luckily in gnome and kde plasma you can disable them and get real always visible scrollbars

[–] z500@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

According to the article they took away the override setting in GTK4 and they aren't bringing it back

[–] Kyiro@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

Customizing the scrollbar on Firefox using CSS is different so many sites don't even bother and keep the default one

load more comments
view more: next ›