this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
67 points (87.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35696 readers
1334 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solaryth@discuss.tchncs.de 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The future is now, old man

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't have my hoverboard yet. It can't be the future.

[–] Abucketofpuppies@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I quote this way too often around my dad. I think it's actually starting to upset him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] loopy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

My God, I couldn’t remember what that scene that dialog was from. I finally found it and here you have it posted already. 😂 Golden scene

https://youtu.be/nRGCZh5A8T4?si=lrYYTS5pyyDs4Zxz

[–] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

“When will it be ‘then’?”

“Soon”

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It does not begin.

It moves ahead of your perceptions.

That said everything has already happened all at once and is over. Our sensual reality refuses to see that. We are too small to see it.

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

No physical mechanisms predefines future events (or is there one ?).

So, I could state that the future does not exist yet and the past as ceased to exist.

in that statement I have a problem with the definition of existence. Does the definition of existence exist itself ? This is (is it ?) more a problem of terminology than philosophy or physics.

[–] MercuryGenisus@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
The future is already here – it's just not evenly distributed.

The Economist, December 4, 2003, William Gibson

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Calculus is just starting to become general knowledge.

[–] algorithmae@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Anthropologically speaking this is the best answer. Our brain needs a certain span of time to establish perceived reality.

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 19 points 1 year ago
[–] corroded@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now plus the amount of time it takes a photon to move the Planck length.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

t_furure_min = t_now + 5.391247 × 10^-44 seconds

[–] corroded@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

long double future_time = static_cast(time(nullptr)) + (5.391247L * pow(10.0L, -44.0L))

Fixed-precision arithmetic would probably be more appropriate here, but since I'm lazy, long double works. Although I am curious now if a long double has sufficient precision to give a meaningful value for this.

[–] drbluefall@toast.ooo 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like at some point, you'd need arbitrary precision and arbitrarily-sized real numbers in order to meaningfully represent it.

[–] PassTheChicken@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Now. No wait, now. Nope, now.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 13 points 1 year ago

The future is now, old man!

The future begins in the very next moment after the present.

It's a constantly moving boundary, always just ahead of the current moment.
Philosophically or metaphorically, "the future" might be considered any time beyond the immediate present, whether that's a second, an hour, a year, or a millennium from now.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh it's already started. We just didn't get the good one.

[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What if we actually did? Scary.

[–] banana_meccanica@feddit.it 9 points 1 year ago

It is a human concept that does not exist in reality, the future could for the universe have the same value of the past, the great snake eating its tail

[–] sandflavoured@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do I have time to grab a beer?

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Always, buddy. Grab a cold one for me too. Cheers.

[–] Devious_Thoughts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I feel like we're in it lately with: the lab grown meat, 3D printing building and drones, CRISPR technology, and even something as "basic" as our smartphones.

At this point the only thing that I'm waiting for is space travel 😎

Edit: ugh, just read the rest of the responses and people are such bummers

[–] thelsim@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Thank you for your answer! Nice to see something besides a literal interpretation of the question (Though to be fair, it was also the first thing that popped in my head :)
Anyway, I have to agree with you. A lot of things that seemed almost impossible or ridiculously far-fetched when I was little are now common place or close to becoming reality. And I'm not even that old! (forever in my early thirties *cough* *cough*)

[–] nefonous@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Never. Not being started is its definition itself

Unless you make it relative to something else. Now is the future of before, and before was the future of a earlier before

[–] FrancisFeliz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The future is only a false perception of tomorrow, an illusion. Today you might say that tomorrow would be the future, but when tomorrow comes, you will do the same. The future does not exist, since time is not something static, is progressive.

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, that's some impressive writing :)

[–] FrancisFeliz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks. I'm not a native English speaker, but my mom was a literature teacher in Kansas, so consequently I had to learn the language (I'm Dominican).

That happened yesterday weren't you at the meeting?

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

The future is in the future

And the past is a victory walk

Well I need to make you understand, girl

I'M A MAN NOT A DISCO BALL!

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This reminds me of the sign on the wall of a bar: “Free beer tomorrow.”

The future never begins. Once it begins, it’s the present. And the present? Well it’s gone already, isn’t it? The past, on the other hand, is full to bursting with absolutely every fucking thing that’s ever been. Only problem? The past doesn’t exist, and never will.

Basically, we are fucked.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

At the beep.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Well, technically, you never truly experience the present, as your brain processing whatever your senses are picking up is taking some time. So, from an individual standpoint, the future is always kind of already there, as you constantly react to things happening a couple microseconds late.

From a purely etymological point of view, the future is just any period of time that hasn't happened yet.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Eso@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
Colonel Sandurz: Try here. Stop.
Dark Helmet: What the hell am I looking at? When does this happen in the movie?
Colonel Sandurz: Now. You're looking at now, sir. Everything that happens now, is happening now.
Dark Helmet: What happened to then?
Colonel Sandurz: We passed then.
Dark Helmet: When?
Colonel Sandurz: Just now. We're at now now.
Dark Helmet: Go back to then.
Colonel Sandurz: When?
Dark Helmet: Now.
Colonel Sandurz: Now?
Dark Helmet: Now.
Colonel Sandurz: I can't.
Dark Helmet: Why?
Colonel Sandurz: We missed it.
Dark Helmet: When?
Colonel Sandurz: Just now.
Dark Helmet: When will then be now?
Colonel Sandurz: Soon.
Dark Helmet: How soon?
[–] fury@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

When you decide

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Snowman44@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The future was October 21st 2015.

[–] fbmac@lemmy.fbmac.net 2 points 1 year ago

it began and end long ago, we are in the 3rd era of the after post modern post future

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Always right now.

[–] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, it's gonna be the future soon, and I won't always be this way
When the things that make me weak and strange get engineered away

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

It depends on what you define the present as.