this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
530 points (99.4% liked)

News

22874 readers
5200 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A jury has found a delivery driver not guilty in the shooting of a YouTube prankster who was following him around a mall food court earlier this year

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nahvi@lemmy.world 167 points 11 months ago (6 children)

There is little to celebrate here.

Victim still got charged with a felony after spending 5 months incarcerated waiting for trial, and has to wait another month in jail to find out if the judge will overturn his final charge.

Self-described "Goon" still walking around on the streets getting paid for harassing and assaulting strangers. As a bonus, nearly doubled subscribers.

This case is exactly why DA's level stack multiple felonies in these cases.

Jury: Well this is clearly self-defense, but he also probably pushed it too far so we don't think he is innocent. Better just give him one felony.

For those that don't know, the American courts have interpreted the constitutional "right to bear arms" as void for felons. This guy who was just acknowledged to have used his firearm in self-defense, is no longer allowed to own a firearm for his own protection.

Discharge of firearm in in public building: https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter7/section18.2-279/

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 151 points 11 months ago (22 children)

Cook said he continues to make the videos, from which he earns $2,000 to $3,000 a month.

Professional asshole gets shot and learns nothing. All over 2 to 3k a month. Dude could literally work at mcdonalds and make that kind of money.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I'd rather get shot than work at McDonald's. Have you worked a low wage customer facing job? Literally anything is better. I'd rather have children kick me in the balls all day.

[–] OrangeJoe@lemm.ee 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

But you would also have to be a total asshole and go around harassing strangers who are just trying to get on with their lives.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

True, my point was more about using McDonald's as a measuring stick is a bad call. Like I'd seriously have to think about it if I have to do one or the other for an extended period.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If I could guarantee I'd live, I think I legit agree.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago

Do what you love, and you'll never work a day in your life...

This kid loves being an obnoxious asshole, it's his calling.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He's working up his immunity by getting shot with smaller calibers first, by the time he's making 10k/month, he'll have himself immune to high-caliber rifle rounds from people that are trying to kill him from a distance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Sue the youtuber until he bankrupts.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] athos77@kbin.social 112 points 11 months ago (2 children)

These are the types of people who don't understand consent. They shove a camera six inches from your face, say nonsensical bullshit, keep following you when you back up, don't listen when you repeatedly say No and Stop, yet are all shocked Pikachu when someone finally has enough. Fuck these "pranksters". I hope his next injury is worse, because we all know this literal warning shot wasn't enough and he's going to continue.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 47 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't think a shot in the abdomen counts as a "literal warning shot". I think it's more of just a shot shot.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In the context of not being fucking dead, it's a warning.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago (9 children)

It's still not a warning shot.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] spider@lemmy.nz 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I hope his next injury is worse, because we all know this literal warning shot wasn't enough and he's going to continue.

...trying to out-Jackass Steve-O.

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I didn't watch Steve-o's own show but were there any Jackass skits where they accosted sometime who wasn't in their crew? Some of them happened in public but they were still members of the crew being stupid and filming the publics reaction from afar.

That said, maybe I'm forgetting a skit?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maajmaaj@lemmy.ca 54 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Reading the article it seems they found that he acted in self defense but still got him on a weapons charge which is being appealed.

[–] Maajmaaj@lemmy.ca 50 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Dude has a concealed carry license, hopefully it helps in this situation. It sucks that he's been incarcerated since April over this. Fuck an exploitative YouTuber.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He is being rewarded by youtube and his subs for that behavior. Which is especially messed up given youtube demonitizes videos for saying shit and fuck but not the harassment and stalking this guy does.

[–] OrangeJoe@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I reported his channel for harassment way back when this all started and I know a bunch of other people did too. So glad YouTube cares...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

Its a serious problem in our entire criminal justice system. Trump is the post child for the inequality. Charged with 91 felonies and walking around doing as he pleases. Meanwhile this poor guy has been locked up for months without a trial, and may get off with no jail time but he's in jail anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 25 points 11 months ago (5 children)

A) it says he was acquitted of one charge, but convicted of another. I'm trying to figure out what the second charge was, except

B) all the news sites that popped up at the top of Google search are literally identical. Cool.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

Silver lining.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Good.

Man doesnt deserve jail for shooting the piece of shit.

he deserves a medal, and a license to go do it to more of those tiktok assholes.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They're both pieces of shit. You shouldn't shoot someone without a reasonable fear of your life (or arguably property) being in danger. This situation wasn't there yet. The fuckface was just being intentionally annoying.

The Youtuber should be in jail for harassment or assault. The shooter should be taking a nice plea deal for a low amount of prison time.

You can't just shoot someone in the middle of the mall because they're annoying.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

This is such a bad ruling. Not only does that jackass get off with no punishment he is even being rewarded for his crimes! Setting the precedence for other pranksters to assault people more and more, and when they fuck around and find out, all they'll be finding is more viewers and more money.

Should dude had shot him? Thats not my place to say, but if he did indeed feel threatened, which the jury agreed, then he should not be punished for reacting to being assaulted like this.

Its like some people online want the victim to get in trouble for simply owning and carrying a gun, its ridiculous! The victim was being assualted full stop! Not his fault for using what his legally own gun is meant for.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Uh... the guy who shot the YouTuber isn't being punished; they found him not guilty. The YouTuber isn't being punished because this case wasn't about his actions, it was about the dude who shot him. He's not being rewarded, though.

The only weird part about the ruling is the jury wants to convict on the "gun charges" (that's what the article referenced, doesn't say what that means) but acquitted him on the shooting.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

The victim is being punished! He is recieving a felony for protecting himself just because it took place in a building. And that dumb youtuber was rewarded by having his followers almost double after the fact, which equates to more money, while the victim is sitting in jail.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›