this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
530 points (99.4% liked)

News

23371 readers
4883 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A jury has found a delivery driver not guilty in the shooting of a YouTube prankster who was following him around a mall food court earlier this year

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A) it says he was acquitted of one charge, but convicted of another. I'm trying to figure out what the second charge was, except

B) all the news sites that popped up at the top of Google search are literally identical. Cool.

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This tracks.

Weird how every article about this from today is copy and pasted and omits such key details.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Welcome to modern journalism. It's copy and paste and AI translators all the way.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

That would corroborate his lawyers saying that a conviction after a finding of a lack of malice is inconsistent.

Except the next paragraph says:

If any such act be done unlawfully, but not maliciously, the person so offending is guilty of a Class 6 felony;

But, if the shooting was in self-defense, was it unlawful? Maybe the guy was legally allowed to defend himself, but not legally allowed to shoot a gun inside a crowded food court. Like, the self-defense covers him for injuring another person, but it doesn't cover the danger he posed to other people when he did it?

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Guess I gotta cool it with throwing missiles in public, keep it to the backyard for a bit.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Malice is required.

[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

charges of aggravated malicious wounding and malicious discharge of a firearm

Those are the two other charges. I'm not sure which one he was convicted of though.

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

The wounding is the main charge.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I noted this as well. No info about the second conviction.

Another poster said there was an appeal, I can't find anything about it, by whom, or on what.

Also see no info about post verdict motions.

It sounded to me as though there may be inconsistent verdicts. I don't know this aspect of criminal procedure to say what happens in this case. I think it's a mistrial, and dude may be retried? Could be a directed verdict on the convicted charge.

[–] Nahvi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

B) all the news sites that popped up at the top of Google search are literally identical. Cool.

I was just skimming through them, so it took me about five articles to realize that they weren't just sharing quotes but were actually exact copies. I felt like I was crazy for a minute. I have never seen this kind of thing with news articles, but makes me wonder how common it is.

Also, I was using DDG not Google so it is not just their problem.