A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration
No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world
Gotta love these kind of news. There's always these hypothetical discussions of clouds being insecure and companies generally just ignore that, because clouds are theoretically, sometimes cheaper.
And then every now and then, half the internet leaks out of one of these clouds and everyone's like, holy crap, and then companies go back to generally just ignoring that, because clouds are theoretically, sometimes cheaper.
Unfortunately nobody in charge has seen consequences for their decision to save a few theoretical nickels, so far. But then again, a lot of software/IT related stuff would look completely different, if anybody did.
Yeah, with the GDPR, you could theoretically get sued for using inappropriate technologies, but unless a proper expert committee officially declares Azure et al unsalvagable, you can always say, you thought you were using safe technologies.
I do not think anyone belive clouds are cheaper. For a stable workload probably 2x as expecive. Especially when you also count the new finops department you need to know what you are actually paying for in the cloud.
What cloud do give is virtualy infinite capacity, infinite scale out performance, instant availabillity and scaleabillity up to a global presence, no up-front cost, no tear down cost, bragging rights, no long running contracts and api's for EVERYTHING.
Edit: I did see you write theoretically ;)
Let me add another important point: outsourcing responsibility. In case of a data breach, you have someone to sue and you don't need a whole internal team to be up to date on the latest security topics. Instead, they just have to be able to manage the web interface (not saying that is easy, just less subject to changes)
Ding ding ding. It's all about outsourcing accountability as much as possible. Always need a finger to point at if things go wrong.
Given the average company I believe the cloud being more secure, of course they can shoot themselves d in the foot in the cloud as well but that wouldn't be the cloud being insecure. The cheaper part.... not sure if I would agree, it is more simple and easier to manage than your own physical hardware and all that entails, unless you require very little, that's for sure.
The exposed data included backups of personal information belonging to Microsoft employees, including passwords for Microsoft services, secret keys, and an archive of over 30,000 internal Microsoft Teams messages originating from 359 Microsoft employees.
In an advisory on Monday by the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) team, Microsoft said that no customer data was exposed, and no other internal services faced jeopardy due to this incident.
Wait, they stored passwords in plain text?
Possibly or as a weak hash
Always have done so.
🧑🚀🔫
This is like the evolution of the “loss” meme. Gave me a chuckle.
Microsoft said that no customer data was exposed
Sure, we'll just take your word for it, buddies. Cheers. /laughs in Linux
You can use Linux and still have a Microsoft account.
Can, but shouldn't. I have a work related Teams account, and one where I tried to rent a Windows VM for a consulting job. That's it though - no private data to get leaked. The work conversations would suck though, but I'll happily remind my boss et al why using Teams is a shitty idea in the first place.
Microsoft owns GitHub. The blast radius for this could be severe.
Yeah, but the naivety of people believing in secure clouds needs to die. So if this helps, I'm all for it.
📎 “It looks like you’re trying to steal terabytes worth of data. Here, let me just give it to you!”
Lol! I used to pin him to my desktop. I loved having him for some reason...
Did Microsoft officially stop caring about security or is this more of a fad, like when everything was tiles for a while?
To be fair Microsoft has never cared much about security. See the windows server (a relatively niche os on servers) second entry in this stat: https://www.statista.com/statistics/701020/major-operating-systems-targeted-by-ransomware/.
It is just that nowadays this kind of issues are more in the news because of "russian cyber criminals", while in the past no one really cared.
Not that I complain... Visibility is actually a good thing
It's not relatively niche on SMBs though. It's a major target so it'll always get hit.
It's far less common than linux oses... In any type of servers, including data storages. It is THE major target because it is a bad OS, nowadays primarily used by companies that haven't a good IT. The combination results in that stat... Practically 100 % of successful ransomware attacks on servers is on windows servers, despite overall being much less used than competitors
The more staff a company has, the more chance of mistakes/idiots.
They should have scans to pick a lot of this up though.
If you think that's bad check out Apple right now
please, explain
See Pegasus
That’s not an explanation
Yeah, neither is that.
Just more links. Come on.
How many links do you need?
That must be why I've been getting a million 2fa emails recently asking me to verify my Microsoft account sign in.
Hmm, by using Authy I wouldn't receive these. They'd just be asked for the current code and unable to proceed.
On the one hand I'm happy not getting spammed like you with 2fa requests. On the other, I think I'd like to know if any of my user/password pairs have been compromised.
I imagine at some point it could be added to the Have I Been Pwned tool, which you can use to check for the presence of your credentials being in a data breach.
Tbh I am not sure what he is talking about. I didn't know Microsoft had 2FA by mail. They have their authenticator app, sms, physical key, windows auth (or whatever is called that the PC acts as key/2fa). I know of one case where you can get invited to an org and if you don't have an azure account the login is done by a mail they sent you, but I wouldn't call that 2FA. But I guess here is a mail version I didn't know about.
Oh you're right. I thought it was notification spam to the phone/watch that @Random_user was complaining about.
There is an email MFA method for Hotmail/LiveID accounts, but M365 doesn't have email as an authentication method. There's Authenticator Lite, which comes through as a notificataion through the Outlook App on the phone, though. Not so many organisations use it because it's fairly new and we've mostly been doing MFA for years by now.
Pretty sure the person who said they are getting 2fa emails was meaning that they are getting email alerts from Microsoft that says "we blocked these logins. Were they you?"
Some service providers do this when they see large attempts to access accounts fail due to 2fa blocks.
Azure storage defaults to being private and when you make it public it gives you a warning prompt to accept...
What else can you expect from microcrap...
Why bother renaming it, it's always been microshit.