this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
432 points (99.3% liked)

Sysadmin

7634 readers
2 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Did Microsoft officially stop caring about security or is this more of a fad, like when everything was tiles for a while?

[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To be fair Microsoft has never cared much about security. See the windows server (a relatively niche os on servers) second entry in this stat: https://www.statista.com/statistics/701020/major-operating-systems-targeted-by-ransomware/.

It is just that nowadays this kind of issues are more in the news because of "russian cyber criminals", while in the past no one really cared.

Not that I complain... Visibility is actually a good thing

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not relatively niche on SMBs though. It's a major target so it'll always get hit.

[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's far less common than linux oses... In any type of servers, including data storages. It is THE major target because it is a bad OS, nowadays primarily used by companies that haven't a good IT. The combination results in that stat... Practically 100 % of successful ransomware attacks on servers is on windows servers, despite overall being much less used than competitors

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 5 points 1 year ago

The more staff a company has, the more chance of mistakes/idiots.

They should have scans to pick a lot of this up though.