this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
68 points (85.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43417 readers
1962 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

MrBeast and his many imitators. Don't get the appeal and the constant shouting voice is very annoying to me. I guess I'm just too old.

[โ€“] snowe@programming.dev 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Veritasium. As soon as he put out a video with sponsored content where he lied with science I immediately knew he could no longer be trusted. I completely stopped watching his videos that day.

[โ€“] Tristano@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I kinda slowed down on his videos since that Tom Nicolas video, but I watched his video from a few days ago about blimps because blimps are cool. But it just seemed like a corporate ad. The amount of the video that's renders of products vs actual products is pretty bad.

It didn't feel like a science video about blimps, it felt like half blimp startup ad, half simple blimp explanation. I don't know, it just felt a little devoid of depth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] mudeth@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[โ€“] ItsPlasmaSir@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There was this one from a couple years ago that was about self-driving cars and also sponsored by Waymo. Tom Nicholas made a video which IMO does a good job of covering the problems with that video, and the broader implications of this kind of content on YouTube.

[โ€“] snowe@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

Ha, I wasn't even talking about that one. I think I stopped watching before then because he just went in deep with the sponsors and it was clear he wasn't actually caring about the science anymore. The one I'm talking about he 'proved' that wet wipes are flushable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] snowe@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

found it. https://youtu.be/5zI9sG3pjVU?t=983

there's even people in the comments that don't realize the experiment was bad science and think that maybe these wipes are 'different'

more people actually saying they're going to switch to flushable wipes.

[โ€“] mudeth@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the answers! I had a bad taste in my mouth after his dandruff video which felt very corporate but I gave him the benefit of the doubt assuming that the science was solid. I guess my gut instinct was right.

I still think a lot of his videos are good, it's just sad that the obviously sponsored ones are low quality. I'll check out the links and response video someone else posted and keep being skeptical.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] snowe@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't remember which video it was, I'd have to go find it. At the end he sets up a 'science experiment' to show that wet wipes are flushable, unlike what everyone says. And the way he 'proves' it is clearly a terrible way to prove it, but if you aren't thinking about it you'll agree. I'll try to find the video.

load more comments (4 replies)
[โ€“] Zahille7@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn, really? His concrete video was pretty interesting

[โ€“] snowe@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

yeah. honestly it stinks because he did have good science videos. but as soon as he sold out and the way he did so I knew he was no longer an educational channel.

[โ€“] hatchet@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So many tech YouTubers are overrated, but one who really stands out to me is JayzTwoCents. Somehow I have several memories of clicking on one of his videos and being shocked at him being confidently incorrect about something. I no longer click on his videos at all.

Thats crazy I unsubsceibed from him just yesterday

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago

All influencer types. Influencing kids to be more vain, more selfish, more money focused, more vapid and empty?

[โ€“] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MrBeast is a horrible example of a person and everyone acts like he's a second coming out Jesus. He fucks up people's lives with his "charity" on a regular basis.

PewDiePie is one of the most annoying people ever born.

[โ€“] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does he fuck up people's lives?

[โ€“] JGrffn@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I want to know as well. His content isn't exactly my cup of tea and can feel dystopia, but my dude flies around the world giving away free surgery to people and shit, and he promotes charities and foundations and actually moves people to donate to them. His thumbnails are creepy as shit, and his content feels like it was made to be cut up into a bunch of 6 second tiktok videos, but I don't really see a dark side here.

[โ€“] LichbaneLB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm no Mr beast fan, but the dystopia you feel isn't his fault. It's the fault of our society. It's the fact that some people have to rely on a clickbait youtubers generosity to have vision surgery, instead of it being freely available. It's the fact that inequality is so rampant and ever growing due to our infinite capacity for greed.

[โ€“] WuTang@lemmy.ninja 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mr Beast and his fucking thumbnails with open mouth and ugly mustache. How come such douche can make 5M views in 2days, it baffles me.

[โ€“] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

I get why he got popular but I'm amazed that the novelty hasn't worn off

[โ€“] Fizz@lemmy.nz 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Kurtuzeg. And alot of the "science" channels. They are so full of shit sometimes.

[โ€“] darcy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

science 'education' channels try not to be extremely biased and corrupt challenge

[โ€“] Justly0250@lemdro.id 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] nodsocket@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Lol I just said this and got downvoted to the bottom.

[โ€“] Matthew@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their videos about the immune system are really good and educational (according to me, who has no idea if they're just making shit up). But pretty much everything else they make is just pop science.

[โ€“] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree. Like most science channels, they're really good when they stick to pure science.

The issues usually occur when they decide to weigh in on a social or policy issue that they're not qualified to talk about. Kurtzgesagt's blunders all seem to be related to climate policy videos and their wishful thinking regarding Hail Mary technologies saving us.

For other readers, my bias is generally pro kurtzgesagt, I have several of their posters on my wall. Their social policy videos have just been really rubbing me the wrong way.

[โ€“] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Sabine has been posting a lot of cringe lately. Such a bummer when a physicist decides to go down the 2009 history channel swerving out of their lane career path.

[โ€“] echodot@feddit.uk 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

MKBHD simply because I have absolutely no idea what the point in the channel is.

Obstensively it's a tech review channel, but really it seems to be a look at my cinematography and all this b-roll footage channel. Also iPhones, which is always boring because let's face it the last time Apple did anything close to innovative with the iPhone was the the 5C.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Another one I'd mention is Rooster Teeth (the whole gang). I watched some of their "shenanigans" videos and they were just destroying office furniture, doing shitty pranks and in general being man-childs.

I just thought all the mess they left behind for everyone not on camera and what a shitshow it must be for the production crew to work with a bunch of internet mini-celebrities. They were basically the OG streaming mansion.

Fast forward a few years and you hear all these allegations of terrible work conditions. Go figure.

Stopped watching after the "I understand where racists are coming from" podcast bit

[โ€“] itsapenguin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Mr Beast - all his videos look and feel the same. And there's nothing new that you learn from them.

I find that the majority of the "Big Youtubers" seem to be very overrated. I never got super big into Pewdiepie as a kid, and trying to get into his content during the 100 mil craze made me wonder how he gained such a following (not dissing you if you do enjoy his content, but not my cup of tea).

On the flip side, i really enjoy slimecicles videos. Watching him is like eating a bowl of chicken soup.

[โ€“] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

None, because I ignore the ones I don't like.

[โ€“] jhulten@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago

Isn't it great, not being defined in opposition to triviality?

But for real, everyone is mentioning the same ten creators. It's not a great question.

[โ€“] Skitburd@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

most Poketubers

there's this weird conundrum where a lot of Pokemon fans are older, mostly in their 20s, but the big name Poketubers almost universally aim for kids as their prime demographic

like that's fine and all, but why are you aiming for kids when you're playing a Professor Oak challenge, or something stupid hardcore? show the kids the shiny Rayquaza, show me your 900+ hour save file

also the ones that aren't aimed at kids are usually pretty low quality, sorry Johnstone, sorry Bird Keeper Toby, sorry Absol Plays Pokemon

[โ€“] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Real Engineering

Some really uncritical videos about "pretty out there" startups. It's basically a PR channel.

[โ€“] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Practical engineering is much better imo

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] saegiru@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is all of them a valid answer?

No. There are plenty of YouTubers who make excellent content but are struggling to get views, hardly fits the definition of overrated. Just because they chose YouTube as a platform doesn't automatically invalidate their work. Besides, which other platform do you want them to go to?

[โ€“] scottywh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Pretty much all of the ones we've ever heard of and most of the ones I haven't.

[โ€“] CoderKat@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't personally get the appeal of many gaming YouTubers. I'm not personally very into watching other people play videos (not review, but just play). I can kinda understand some people wanting to watch that, but it always surprises me just how many people watch it and for how long.

It also seems all too common that they have very questionable views and their fans will defend them to the death. I don't get that either. There's some YouTuber creators I really enjoy, but if they said horrible things, I sure as hell aren't going to defend them at all, let alone to the degree that some gaming YouTubers get ardently defended.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] regalia@literature.cafe 10 points 1 year ago

All of them lol

[โ€“] qwrty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Vox, ig. Their videos are the video essay equivalent of a forgettable action flick.

All of them

[โ€“] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Johnny Harris. I really hate the delivery style that he kept from vox. The "guys this is super bad and I'm really concerned but in a like cool and detached way." His delivery just reminds me of every dude I've ever talked to at an indie coffee shop.

His content may or may not be good, but I can't get passed his smarmy delivery to find out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] YexingTudou@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

The School of Life. Terrible channel that sometimes offers potentially dangerous and incorrect info. They paint far too broad a brush considering how complex psychology is. I remember Big Joel did a good video about them a while back.

[โ€“] willya@lemmyf.uk 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ