this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
145 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nine months after Kenneth Smith’s botched lethal injection, state attorney general has asked for approval to kill him with nitrogen

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] derf82@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Cruel? Nitrogen asphyxiation is probably one of the most painless, gentle ways to go.

Your trigger that you can’t breathe is a buildup of carbon dioxide. But as you can still exhale, you feel no panic. You just slowly drift unconscious and die. I’d take it over most causes of death.

[–] dmonzel@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Execution is cruel, regardless of method.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I'm against the death penalty but if I ever murder a load of people then I'd like to be able able to freely choose death by nitrogen over a life in prison

[–] neuropean@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Exactly, the headline is just trying to get people to react.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's a BBC documentary about it, I think this one:

How to Kill a Human Being

It's been a long time since I watched it, but I think the inert gas route is very pleasant. He even gets slightly high/happy from it.

Key takeaways:

  • there are surprisingly easy ways to kill people humanely.
  • many in the US doesn't want to kill prisoners humanely, they want it to hurt and be a punishment, not die in a euphoric high

edit: found it:

https://www.documentarytube.com/videos/how-to-kill-a-human-being-2/

Rendered unconcious within 15 seconds, dead within a minute.

In testing pigs would happily stick their heads in a space with pure nitrogen and munch on apples till they lost consciousness, fell over, then stick their heads back in the space with nitrogen to eat some more apples.

[–] czarrie@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

What kind of apples asking for a friend

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well yeah if we wanted it to be happy and comfortable we’ve had morphine for over a century

[–] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Medical companies will not sell if they suspect it will be used to kill human beings. If they do, they might get banned in Europe

https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/features/lethal-injection-pharma-kill-death-penalty/

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, compared to injecting horrifically painful substances, I don't see why this is controversial.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'd take a firing squad or an enormous hydraulic press tbh. If I were to be an innocent stuck with a death penalty I'd be happy to know somebody will have to clean up a messy pile of guts after my quick death.

The whole point of using gas or chemicals for the death isnt to make the punishment humane - the death penalty is not humane in any way - its to make it easier on the people doing the killing. No mess, no fuss.

[–] jpj007@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

First off, I am against the death penalty. I suppose there are hypothetical scenarios were there may be some remorseless person who committed horrific crimes and for whom there is absolutely no doubt of guilt, and maybe then we can justify removing them from the world permanently. But in the real world, the death penalty is not limited to such scenarios. Innocents have been and continue to be executed. This is unacceptable.

But, if we aren't going to eliminate it, at the very least we can avoid unneeded suffering during it. As I understand it, nitrogen asphyxiation is a comparatively peaceful way to go. So this headline smells of bullshit to me.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you botched an execution, then the convict should be commuted to life sentence or even pardoned if they suffered greatly. In addition, the people who botched it should be put on trial for malpractice and fined/jailed.

[–] aeternum@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The executions aren't done by doctors, as that goes against their hypocratic oath. It's not even done by nurses in a lot of cases. They're done by people who have barely any training. Botched executions are a dime a dozen because of this.

To be clear, I am against all forms of capital punishment. It's barbaric and has no place in 2023.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago

It's barbaric and has no place in 2023.

You need to account for the time zone difference between Alabama and the rest of the world. It's about UTC -50 years

[–] NotBadAndYou@ttrpg.network 14 points 1 year ago

Didn't he ask for that method himself? I'm sure he doesn't want to try injection again.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I hate the death penalty - its barbaric, it kills innocent people etc.

But if people are going to do it I can think of no better metaphor for a state sanctioned death penalty than an enourmous hydraulic press.

All these injections and ethical guidelines are misguided. The cruelty is the point so they might as well just make it quick and lean into it.

[–] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Crushed by the weight of the system."

Maybe "torn apart by the gears of justice?"

I'm pro-death penalty in theory but against it in practice. There's definitely some people who forfeit their right to exist with the rest of us. But we can never apply it fairly or even guarantee we aren't executing actually innocent people. And the ugliness and evil of that is more than enough to make me against capital punishment.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

It's sometimes wrong is my #1 reason.

Om top of that, it's not fairly distributed sometimes and it's also more expensive than just life in prison. With all that, what's the purpose? It's clearly to make other people feel good, not about justice. People love revenge porn, and I think that says a lot about us as people that we're willing to deal with all the negatives to bring us joy about ending another person's life.

[–] Cheekyw443@discuss.online 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The process of putting someone to death is already traumatic to the guards that have to make it happen. It makes them question whether they can find salvation - even though their job made them do it.

Now you’re asking them to experiment on people? At the very least let’s use surefire methods & people who are already murderers for this profession

[–] starrox@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So often I am thankful that I dont have to live in this dystopion shithole country. Thanks for reminding me again.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Currently saving money to get out before next year's election shitshow. I envy you.

[–] nick@campfyre.nickwebster.dev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

wtf the attempted murderers tried to execute him last time even after a judge put a stay on the order???

That's nightmarish. Although all execution is nightmarish. One day the judges involved with these crimes against humanity will hopefully face justice.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Why do we even still have the death penalty?

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

_The protocol, the first that a state has released publicly for nitrogen, indicates that the gas will be pumped into Smith through a “mask assembly”, which will be connected to “breathing gas tubing”. “The mask will be placed and adjusted on the condemned inmate’s face”, it says, and then after the prisoner has been allowed to make a final statement “the Warden will activate the nitrogen hypoxia system”.

The gas will be passed through the mask into the prisoner for 15 minutes, or for five minutes beyond the moment that he flatlines, whichever is longer, the protocol says.

The details given are so vague, Denno said, that it leaves experts to “only speculate about how a state might conduct a nitrogen hypoxia execution”. She added that the placement of a mask on a prisoner’s face “is especially puzzling – what if the inmate tries to take it off, immediately or during the procedure?”_

What a load of shit The Guardian has become. Just to be clear, did we all read the same thing? What details are left out? It seems pretty clear to me what they intend to do, does the how need to be written out in G-code or could your average person make that streeeeenuous mental leap themselves?

The guardian is such a shit rag nowadays. It's like theyve just embraced the wing of the Labour Party that was convinced Corbyn was a communist antisemite. There is zero spine amongst the editors of the Guardian. They also are a supposed left-wing paper that regularly publishes opinions by supposed 'gender critics.'

At this point you can really only rely on the Financial Times as a vaguely left newspaper that doesn't entertain the culture war nonsense politics.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Kenneth Smith is one of two living Americans who can describe what it is like to survive an execution, having endured an aborted lethal injection last November during which he was subjected to excruciating pain tantamount, his lawyers claim, to torture.

If the state of Alabama has its way, he will become the test dummy for an execution method that has never before been used in judicial killings and which veterinarians consider unacceptable as a form of euthanasia for animals – death by nitrogen gas.

The choice of Smith as the first candidate for the technique, less than a year after he experienced a failed execution, has also been criticized as a double violation of the eighth amendment protection against “cruel and unusual punishments”.

Earlier that year, the state took more than three hours to kill Joe Nathan James and later abandoned the execution of Alan Miller after also failing to find a vein.

“The mask will be placed and adjusted on the condemned inmate’s face”, it says, and then after the prisoner has been allowed to make a final statement “the Warden will activate the nitrogen hypoxia system”.

Like many death penalty states, Oklahoma was looking for an alternative to lethal injection, having struggled to procure the necessary drugs as a result of an international boycott by pharmaceutical companies.


The original article contains 1,116 words, the summary contains 220 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] mayo@lemmy.today -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of all the gases why Nitrogen? Argon is more commonly used for kill bags, I think.

[–] krayj@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because nitrogen is already the dominant gas in breathable air. Because it is plentiful and readily available. Because lungs don't detect it as anything different than regular air. It has no side effects and no toxicity. It isn't the nitrogen that kills, it's the lack of oxygen. What humans detect when suffocating is excess carbon dioxide, so as long as that'a removed from the nitrogen enviroment, people will just blissfully slip into unconsciousness and then experience brain death from oxygen deprivation - while in a euphoric state the entire time it happens.

The article title is sensationalist clickbait at best, and outright disinformation at worst.

[–] mayo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk I looked it up (the claim that vets don't use it) and what I read was that it can cause feelings of suffocation. The vet claim here was a little challenging for since I doubt that pets would like a mask on their face regardless of what is coming out of it.

[–] krayj@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

and what I read was that it can cause feelings of suffocation

That is contrary to everything I have found (including veterinary use for euthanasia).

[–] mayo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

You're quite right about that I don't know what I was looking at before.