this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
88 points (90.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35703 readers
1334 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Would more men be open to going to therapy if they had resources tailored specifically for them, and if the office had Emotional Support Animals for appointment use?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quixotic120@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I am an actual licensed therapist and while there are a number of real actual creating barriers specific to men pursuing mental health treatment there are a few factors I’ve consistently seen that are ubiquitous across gender, race, sexuality, class, etc

Money, time, availability

Therapy is inaccessible. I am a therapist who mostly works with insurance companies. They pay me about 100-115/hr. My clients will often have a high deductible health plan which means they need to pay this $100-115 per session until they hit their deductible, which can be 5,000+ dollars. It’s a lot to ask someone to pay $100+ weekly. On top of that they still usually have a responsibility afterwards of (typically) 10-30% so $10-34.5 per meeting which is still a notable weekly cost for many people on the high end especially after shelling out $400+ a month for months on end.

Other clients have PPO insurance which is a fixed cost per meeting but this can vary wildly. More affluent clients have excellent PPOs where they might pay $10-20 per meeting which is not terrible. But that’s rare. We are often covered under the “specialist” copay and many PPO plans have tiered provider coverage now. So a copay for me might be $50 or more per meeting (the worst I saw was $125 which was absurd because it was actually $27 more than I’d get from the insurer in question).

So you have this on top of these plans taking hundreds of dollars out of each pay check. “Well budget for it”. Hard to do because the need for therapy can be inconsistent and many of these people are coming in fo(and specifically symptoms like poor money management). Then on top of that even if you do budget for it you have the inherent issue that the need for outpatient therapy is often not dire/acute so if something more pressing comes up (eg a serious dental/medical issue, car breaks down, short on rent) therapy might be the corner to cut if it’s already established because in the overwhelming majority of cases you won’t die without it; it will just lower your quality of life (sometimes significantly so)

Then comes the time portion. Even if you can get past the cost barrier you have the availability of the therapist and yourself. I’m a night owl and I work late but many of my colleagues don’t. I’m pretty nontraditional though, no kids and my partner is very career oriented themselves whereas many of my peers tend to value the traditional 9-5 much more so they can be home for their children and such.

So when you go to schedule with someone it’s often that you can only get seen during business hours. It’s one thing when it’s a doctors appointment that you have once every few months that you need to duck out of work for but a weekly hour long engagement is much harder to explain. This brings back in the masculinity issues - many men find this basically impossible to disclose to the workplace and basically wouldn’t even try to get an exception for weekly therapy. Even without explicitly saying so asking for 1 hour open a week consistently for a doctors appointment is going to be perceived as therapy by many. But stigma aside many of us simply can’t do that. I’m on the practitioner side and I know I’ve ignored my own physical health at times because it was inconvenient to schedule doctor appointments during my workday.

Our systems of employment (at least in the USA) simply do not provide or protect for medical leave, even when it’s very brief and especially when you are a low level employee (executives and admins tend to have less of an issue ducking out for doctors appointments in my experience at least). There is no legal right to paid or unpaid time off for medical appointments in the USA and that is completely disgusting in 2023.

The final piece is practitioner availability. I have a waitlist through October at the moment and am not accepting new clients. All of my colleagues are in the same boat. The old practices I used to work at constantly call me to see if I’ll take any referrals because their waitlists are so overloaded. The hospitals and clinics I have referral relationships with email me every week for updates. It’s extremely stressful. Every new client, especially adolescent, complains that they are happy to finally have someone after waiting 3-6 months. Even if someone wants a therapist they have to wait ages. It is not uncommon that I get someone and when I call them to start they say they don’t even remember why they called in the first place.

We need more people doing the work. Or ideally we need to make societal reforms so that there are less people experiencing mental health issues. I’ve been doing this almost 15 years now. I, and anyone who doesn’t exclusively work with the rich, can tell you that a significant degree of what we work with is people who lack resources and not proper mental illness. I mean, it is depression and anxiety, but it’s because they have been paycheck to paycheck for years or theyre under a mountain of student loans or credit card debt and the stress is just too much to bear. And their jobs won’t give them raises and there aren’t any other jobs out there that pay more. Not everyone is a software developer or investment banker that can jump ship to another 6 figure job with cushy benefits. Most people work jobs that pay 40-60k with shit benefits and little upward mobility.

To answer your question more directly:

In my opinion it’s a systemic issue based around that super fun phrase everyone loves, “toxic masculinity”. I personally do not subscribe to gender labels but I am amab/male presenting and get a lot of male clients as a result. Many of them tell me they hide the fact that they are in therapy from everyone but their partner. This is indicative of the problem; that being in therapy is weak. That being in therapy makes them a bitch, a wuss, all kinds of pejorative terms. It’s bad, is my point.

So part of the answer imo is not in having doggies and cool dude stuff in the office. Its far more complex and involves redefining masculinity to still including things like being a lumberjack or carpentry or whatever. From there though you need to shed the part where it means you have to be emotionally numb to everything, constantly display strength, embrace the fucked up misrepresentation of stoicism that has you shove all your feelings into your stomach, and glorify anger, rage, and violence as the only appropriate means of emotional expression.

this could also be extended to the stigma surrounding therapy itself and the tendency to associate therapy need with weakness. This is an issue that goes beyond therapy though; there are people who won’t see medical doctors for the same reason even though they’re in physical pain. Our pride is our downfall.

Tldr make therapy cheap and accessible, make protections for workers to seek medical care, increase the amount of practitioners (or decrease the need for them), and systemic reform to the societal concept of masculinity and pride. So probably gonna take awhile

This was quite simply the greatest 'not rant' I've read in a long time. Really well reasoned and I completely agree (although, in New Zealand we don't suffer from nearly as much pressure).

One of the things that really keeps me repelled by conventional therapy in business hours is not just the time out from work, but it's the emotional hangover that lasts hours or days in some cases. Fuck trying to pokerface my way through that one - one drop of verbal praise and it'll be the ugly waterworks all over again...

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is a fantastic response, and it's good to see someone taking a practical view of time/money/availability concerns.

One aspect I haven't seen raised much is a slightly subtler parsing of the whole masculinity thing. Perhaps it's generational (I'm genx), perhaps it's cultural (I'm not from the US), but I think perceived weakness is a misreading of the motivation, or perhaps even a more-acceptable out, for many guys.

Perhaps this might give someone out there an angle they find useful, who knows?

A chunk of it from my perspective, and as best I can gather for a lot of guys I know, isn't about being seen as a pussy, it's just... my problem to deal with, not something anyone else has control over or responsibility for, any more than they can go pee for me when I need to. The anxiety here isn't jocks kicking sand in your face, it's the sitcom dad asking what the hell you expect him to do about it, idiot.

It's associated with and caused by cultural gender norms and the way we're raised, but I think it's a misleading oversimplification to suggest that it's just about not appearing masculine enough. It's not about being 'man enough' to tough it out, it's that as men, they're taught that the only resource they have is themselves.

And a second major facet is that for a lot of guys, losing control of their emotions in and of itself represents painful catastrophic failure. While guys definitely get punished and shamed for displaying vulnerability, the flipside of that is that they tend to rely on the resulting rigidity for refuge and protection. But especially since they get no opportunity to practice controlled, minor release of negative emotions, that protection is all or nothing; one good crack and the entire structure collapses. And that's not the cathartic but ultimately healing purge people think of it as, but rather a terrifying, traumatic and destructive breakdown of everything that's holding them together. And most guys I know would no more put themselves in that harm's way than they'd shove their arm down a garbage disposal.

Again: caused by shitty gender norms, but the connection isn't the one people usually paint. We're no longer told during our upbringing that boys don't cry; that's a horrible relic of the bad old days. Instead boys are told that only babies cry. Crying isn't feminised, it's infantilised. The shame associated is not due to being inadequately male, but inadequately adult (but only if you're male). This of course does women no favours; when men see crying in women as accepted and encouraged, what they hear is that women must be fundamentally infantile on some level themselves.

If we want to see better emotional resilience in men specifically, and better use of mental health resources by men, I think the most effective change would be a cultural shift creating a safer environment in which they can be vulnerable. There's no use telling men that they should be vulnerable, in a society that will just hurt them for it; the ground needs to be prepared first. That means a hard, critical look at gendered expectations around emotional expression in children, and a significant change to how they're raised. It means treating phrases like 'man-baby', 'man-flu' and 'male tears' as toxic and offensive on par with racial slurs, and a bunch of surrounding attitudes treated like the ingrained racism of boomer grandparents.

It'd be really nice if we could stop telling people how to do their gender altogether, and stop using gender-compliance as a proxy for admirable character traits. Every time well-meaning people promote the notion that Real Men Are (generous / honest / hardworking / etc.), they're pushing the converse, that insufficiently-masculine people are (mean / shifty / lazy / etc.), and that makes the whole problem worse, not better.

[–] quixotic120@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is pretty much what I meant by that fucked up misinterpretation of stoicism

Like you have the actual Aurelius stoicism which has some very good value; everyone should read meditations once or twice. But then it’s been cliff notes’d and perverted by a bunch of people into to lose the message entirely from “be in control of your emotions” to what you’ve described: horrific rigidity to keep it all in at all times until of course it doesn’t work anymore and you break down spectacularly. Like somehow the message has gone from “control” to “emotional numbness”

A similar dynamic has happened with nihilism where some the writings on it are not so bleak and terrible; that it is an expression of freedom. But over the years it’s been perverted into nothing matters, why bother

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is no legal right to paid or unpaid time off for medical appointments in the USA and that is completely disgusting in 2023

Does FMLA not cover this? I had a coworker that was able to use that to call off basically whenever they wanted because their doctor put in for it due to stress.

[–] ken_cleanairsystems@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FMLA is unpaid leave. This is a major oversimplification, but it's so an employee can take an extended leave from work and return to their job afterwards. And even though it's unpaid, there are still a lot of limitations on it.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe the company I work for is going above and beyond then and just calling it that because there's definitely a paid version of FMLA I've seen people use. Even for shorter periods and intermittent health problems.

Maybe the company I work for is going above and beyond then and just calling it that

That's what it sounds like to me. Well, actually, it just sort of sounds like your company is calling normal paid sick leave "FMLA". It's nice to have, regardless of what it's called, and very sad that it's not a given everywhere.

This is purely anecdotal of course, but most of my (male) friends and family members who resist going to therapy aren't really turned off because of access to a specific service tailored for them or not; they're "turned off" from it largely because of the social perception of men going to therapy in general.

What I mean to say is, no, I don't think we need more therapy "tailored" towards men, all (decent) therapists already specifically try to bend their particular therapy-ing style to match their client, regardless of gender. We need to change the perception of what it means to get therapy (at least in my opinion).

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Therapy is never a cure. If you have a problem then therapy can help you confront it and deal with it, but if we have a massive society-wide mental health crisis it will not be solved by each man individually seeking therapy.

We need meaning in our lives, something worth dedicating ourselves to, and the means to pursue it. Mercenary capitalism won't provide that.

In short, I don't see an answer. I think it will get worse.

Addendum:

Most importantly, this new wave of mental health problems is not caused by a new wave of "not being vulnerable." It's a societal issue and must be confronted there, not shunted onto each individual man.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Therapy gives you the tools to help achieve that. You are completely underestimating it.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it's one big cause that applies to millions, then no, individual therapy cannot fix that massive problem.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah that's true. There's just not enough therapists.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if there were enough therapists, and even if they could actually help, you're still talking about fixing mental problems instead of preventing them.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

It does prevent them

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  1. I can't afford hundreds of dollars an hour, and if I could I'd be in a vastly better place anyway.

  2. I see thinking as something I do, not something that happens to me. As such, my inner Red Forman takes a deep fucking breath at the idea of paying someone else to tell me well don't do that then.

  3. My goals would involve the damage not being done in the first place. My coping skills in the face of what did happen, I'm honestly pretty impressed with. Unless you've got a time machine and a shotgun, there's not a lot you can offer me.

  4. Some support would be nice, but the suggestion that being angry about the harm done to me is a flaw on my part that needs fixing... rankles, you know? (and at the same time, validation-as-a-service would be as empty and downright masturbatory as extracting an apology from an AI)

  5. Dog-as-a-service, heck yeah. I don't really want to pay psych prices or go get my soul flayed as a condition of entry, though.

[–] kwking13@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

This is actually very interesting and gets at the heart of the problem in many different ways. Very true that there's a money barrier that excludes some that might be most in need of services. There needs to be a more focused effort on providing assistance to those who need it at reduced rates or with additional insurance help.

But the bigger problem still remains with helping men (and women frankly, but moreso men) to understand what therapy/counseling is and is not. For years psychologists have been naming symptoms and diagnosing individuals with such and such disease or shortcoming on the part of the individual. Just like everything in the corporate world, they rely on statistics and numbers to come up with definitions for problems and for solutions.

I'm currently enrolled in a master's program to obtain my licensing for professional counseling, and I can tell you that the attitude on that is finally starting to bend. I hear what you're saying about what not wanting therapy to simply be a self-affirmation circle-jerk because it doesn't feel helpful to be told how wonderful you are by a person just to be knocked right back down again in a real-world experience.

But beneath even your resistance there's still an admission that support can be helpful. In my personal opinion, I think counseling/therapy is a purposeful space to open up about experiences and feelings that you wouldn't otherwise have an opportunity to express. Talking to yourself or talking to animals is helpful, but simply being able to unburden your thoughts to another human being that doesn't know you and won't judge you (or at least... they're paid not to judge you) for your opinions or past mistakes can be a hugely beneficial step towards true healing.

Ultimately no counseling or therapy techniques can be effective until you decide they can be. It's about helping to reframe your thoughts in ways you might not have considered, and it's also meant to give you useful tools for coping with feelings both now and in the future. Successful counseling is one in which the client feels comfortable and confident about how to deal with the hardest parts of human existence.

More needs to be done to educate people about what they can expect from counseling so they can make their own decisions about whether or not it would be useful to them. Being able to word vomit my insecurities with a stranger for an hour is surprisingly uplifting and helps me clear my head towards whatever's coming next.

[–] Izzgo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

the suggestion that being angry about the harm done to me is a flaw on my part that needs fixing…

If the day ever comes when you would prefer not being angry about the past, when you would prefer to embrace joy on a daily basis, then and only then would therapy be worthwhile. As long as you're not lashing out at others with your anger, then only you, alone, are being hurt by your anger.

[–] Alterecho@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

Wow, I'm seeing a lot of strong anti-therapy vibes here, so I'll pitch in my two cents.

Therapy is a great tool, if you go into it with clear expectations and you can stomach the cost- both in time and money. Some insurance providers cover it, some don't, but either way if you don't have a therapist that you vibe with, you need to be willing to swap around until you find someone that fits you. Note, however, that there's a big difference between a therapist that is right for you, and one that just doesn't challenge you.

My experience with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy has been really positive; my first therapist that I really got along with professionally was a great teacher, I really learned how to unpack things that I was feeling in the moment. He helped teach me tools to alleviate the intensity of moments that seemed dire, and to then reflect on why they felt that way, afterwards.

There's a lot of people who think that it's supposed to magically fix you, and no, it's not. It's work. Genuinely some of the hardest work I've done has been applications of the stuff I've learned in therapy. But, while I recognize that with stuff like chronic depression, true cures are rare-to-impossible, I've got a much better handle on my negative thoughts and self-esteem than I had pre-therapy. It's been a tremendous help.

I think more tools for people in general would be incredible - the work of normalizing therapy has come a long way, but still it has even further to go. I think the biggest barrier is always cost, and in a perfect world we'd treat both sickness of the mind and body free for everyone.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

In this economy?

[–] guyrocket@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I am a man who has been to therapy a few times during my life. I'll not try to sell it as a be all, end all solution but it can be helpful.

At least as helpful was a men's support group that I went to while divorcing.

I think the bottom line is that men need to connect with men and talk things out sometimes. However you do that, with friends, at a support group or with a therapist does not really matter. Male isolation is real and that is what we as a society should be very concerned about.

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One reason I dont want to do therapy is simple paranoia. Anything you tell your therapist can be subpoenad by a court. That alone is enough to keep me from trusting a therapist with anything of substance.

That said, anything in my life that might motivate me to do something that would land me in court is probably something I should see a therapist about.

Truth is, I'm unlikely to do anything that would land me in court, so I should probably see a therapist about this paranoia.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe you're really a bit paranoid. I don't think those doctors will give away your secrets easily. They'll fight and have a lawyer on their own and try to make it impossible. Their job demands trust from their patients.

And the court isn't supposed to ignore your rights either, unless it somehow fits the crime. So you should be completely fine if it's some lesser crime dealing with drugs, stealing or something like that.

And isn't this hearsay anyways?

This may change if somebody's life is on the line. But then you're probably really a criminal and deserve to be prosecuted.

Still, you could ask your therapist not to write anything down. There is nothing to be requested if it doesn't exist in the first place.

(Maybe there are a few exceptions nowadays since this culture war in the US took off.)

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Therapy costs money. There aren't really enough therapists in the market to get help to everyone that needs it, so the resources are "rationed" to people that have the most money. Even if the resources were tailored towards men (and I'm unclear how taht would be different from any other patient-centered therapy?), unless more men had the resources to pay for therapy, it's not likely to make a difference.

Moreover, as someone else said, many of the things that are causing anxiety and depression in general--not just in men--are not things that can be solved with therapy. Therapy can't make you feel better about climate collapse, for instance, or seeing your ability to afford housing spiraling out of control.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In the US I feel like it’s just as much of an issue of access as it is, perhaps, a stigma that you “aren’t a man” if you go to therapy.

Therapy is expensive, and health care doesn’t always cover it.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The US government can find little space guys, but they can't find me a good affordable healthcare plan.

[–] guyrocket@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The thing is, no one has to know you're going to therapy. You don't have to tell anyone and your therapist shouldn't be talking about you either.

[–] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a woman but due to my interests in traditionally masculine activities and general disinterest in conventional gendered behaviours, I hang around a lot of men. Most of my close friends have been men. From my experience, if men want to improve their mental health then they need to develop a better relationship with vulnerability and the shame they've been conditioned to feel around that.

Mental health stigma exists for everyone and as a society we need to fuck this right off. Mental health challenges are part of the human experience in the same way physical illnesses are and we need to support people accordingly. I've noticed that a lot of men tend to have issues with expressing their feelings out of fear of being vulnerable. The outdated myth that men are less emotional really doesn't help this situation either. This can also create barriers for men in seeking mental health support, both formal and informal.

It needs to more okay for men to be vulnerable. All people are vulnerable and it doesn't make you weak. All people need support at some point in their lives. Emotions are really hard and it's better to recognise and acknowledge them than it is to push them down. Expressing vulnerability and overcoming difficult feelings shows bravery and strength.

Every single man I know tells his version of the same story: You confide in a woman, you tell her something you're upset about, something you're insecure about, you open up...and she uses it as a weapon against you the next time she's angry. She wasn't offering her support, she was arming herself.

Women talk a big game about wanting men to be more emotional, more vulnerable, more open. They love pretending this about themselves. A man saying emotion words is their favorite TV show, but it seems like it never airs. I've had girls throw weird little tantrums because I was frustratingly okay. If there wasn't anything wrong with me, she was going to BE the thing wrong with me. Then I'll have to talk about my feelings with her.

...until he actually does. Then it's time to throw his clothes out the window while screaming about "emotional labor." She shouldn't be expected to handle his emotions for him. How dare he burden her in such a way?

Most men have learned this lesson by the time he's figured out how to have orgasms on purpose. He knows not to open up to a woman the same way he knows not to headbutt a cactus. All it's going to do is make his whole week suck more.

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would it mean to you to tailor resources specifically to men? How would they differ from resources available to everyone generally?

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most men, myself included are so emotionally stunted that before we even begin to go through therapy we literally need to be taught how to feel.

[–] TitanLaGrange@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

need to be taught how to feel.

And before that you'd need to convince a lot of us that that would be more useful than the current situation.

[–] Wrend@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Disclaimer at the beginning, my reply is purely anecdotal and based on my own life and experiences. I can't speak for everyone else.

I really don't think that talk therapy is best suited for most men. Men don't process emotions, conflict, or fears in the same way that women do. We have been shaped differently by societal norms, and don't have the same foundation to process our issues simply by talking about them. We have been taught to shut up and deal with situations on our own. Talking about our struggles and asking for help is a sign of weakness, and even if we manage to ask for help, the chances that we will truly open up are slim.

Again, I can only really speak for myself, but for talk therapy to truly be effective it has to be more than just talk. We need a foundation; maybe starting with something like cognitive behavioral therapy to give us the tools to understand how to process our emotions would be a good start. Men are taught to understand and explore only a small handfull of emotions. Anger, jealousy, fear, happiness, and if we're lucky, love.

I personally have had to do a lot of work on my own self, and my own understanding of my emotional landscape, just to begin to be able to open up. I can honestly say that even if I had spoken with a therapist - and I have had the opportunity to do so - that it probably wouldn't have been useful to me, at least not in the past. Maybe now it would be useful to talk to a therapist, but in working on myself I feel that I have also learned to move past many of my own issues, or at the very least am on the right path to be able to handle them on my own.

Anyway, that's my two cents.

[–] UnknownCircle@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I'd be interested in petting doggos and hanging out if that's what you mean by tailored, but not any traditional therapy. Going affects my employment opportunities, which I care about far more than my mental health. If I wanted to not suffer everyday of my life I'd shift my priorities, expectations, push my boundaries or off myself. Since I haven't done those things yet, things must be fine enough.

I would have a very bad opinion of any version of myself that was happy or content while being aware of all the terrible things we human beings get up to.

The only way I could be convinced to genuinely engage with therapy is if I thought it'd achieve some material goal of mine like making more money. Proving some positive correlation in earnings or attainment of things that men normally want with therapy would probably help. I'd reluctantly go and commit completely if I thought it'd significantly improve the likelihood of achieving my current or future goals. No dogs necessary at that point, just data.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

The reason I don't go to therapy is because of the expense and the horror stories I've heard from people I know trying to make appointments and find a good one. My job actually has a free counseling service we can use but everyone I know who tried it says it's an absolute joke.

As for emotional support animals, I have a dog at home, having one in the office would just be a distraction.

[–] Paulemeister@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know what it's like in the rest of the world, but I always hear how many people seek a therapist, but can't find one. I don't even know if there's something wrong with me, but I'm interested in finding out. But I don't think it's bad enough to warrant to "steal" a spot for somebody who actually needs it, just for interest sake. (Could be the "man" in me talking though, saying "I'm fine")

Men, in general, are perfectly mentally healthy. There are men who suffer from such things as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder--these men require medical treatment for these disorders as much as I require glasses for my myopia. These are medical problems that require medical solutions.

I am not one of those men. I'm one of the many men who operates under a constant layer of depression, anxiety and anger. For men like me, "Therapy" is pretty much a scam. What's the difference between going to see a "therapist" and going to a fortune teller to read some tarot cards? It costs a lot, insurance won't pay for it, it takes up a lot of time, and nothing about your situation is ever improved. I'm depressed and anxious and angry because society by and large doesn't work. The rich are ruining the world for the rest of us out of sheer greed. I'm a widely skilled man, I'm an auto mechanic, a carpenter, a pilot, a programmer...I've never had a job that paid all of my bills. And there is nothing.

Nothing.

NOTHING.

NOTHING!!!

that a master's degree in a tweed jacket can write on a legal pad that will fix that.

"Resources tailored specifically for them" What "resources?" They ain't got no "resources." They've got a box of tissues and a stack of board games for the neglected/abused children they have to handle. They don't have a July that isn't the hottest on record, health insurance that pays for eye glasses, or stable food prices in there.

Talking about "emotional support animals" makes me think that this is a question of marketing. Therapy for Men^TM^ where the therapist wears flannel and a bushy beard with a waxed mustache, the whole place is wood paneled, there's pictures of axes on the walls, all the furniture is brown leather. Focus groups have shown this is effective for marketing hygiene products, kitchen implements, clothes and alcohol to men, maybe it'll work for mental health counseling.

[–] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will say it every time it's even slightly relevant until I die, The Will to Change by Bell Hooks should be mandatory reading for men. Men suffer unique mental health crises at the hands of patriarchy and need specialized care just as much as anyone else.

To address your specific question though, I think possibly, but not much, because the men who need help and care most are the ones most resistant to reaching out and the ones most insistent on rugged independence and getting up, dusting themselves off, and jumping back in the fight without treating their wounds.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure... But if there is a massive incidence of these "wounds" then therapy and self help is too little too late.

Why is nobody ITT talking about the causes of this wave of misery? We are putting all the responsibility on individual men to show their vulnerability with no interest in solving the initial problems!

[–] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was my intention with plugging The Will to Change, it's definitely not a "here's why men suck" piece, it's a feminist analysis on all of the unique harms that men are subjected to under patriarchy, how those manifest, and how to heal from them. Any analysis of the suffering of men under patriarchy that lands on individual responsibility as a cause for psychological suffering is a bad one.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Sure, but that patriarchy has been around for a long time and this wave of despair is new. You could probably solve some problems that way, but it's not the solution to the big problem we're facing here.

Rising inequality and alienation are the problems.

isn't men's mental health an oxymoron?

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've been to a ton of therapy. It didn't do anything for me. Actual quotes I've heard include, "You're too depressed for therapy," and, "I really focus on one traumatic event at a time; you have too much going on."

So what do I do with that? Nothing. I take my pills, try not to think about the clawing depression, and take care of my family. Therapy isn't going to help because nothing is going to help.

Anywho, back to work Monday.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Naw bro they're gonna have to condense therapy into a pill or something because we don't solve problems by talking about it, we fix em. Trouble is, we can't hack brains. So yeah, a pill.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These issues are so big, therapy isn't gonna be viable. Men have specific and painful societal issues. In the longterm, we need to change the way we socialize boys. The way we talk about expectations of their role, the way we talk about patriarchy and masculinity. There's a lot of toxic masculinity, and far too little positive masculinity. Boys need far better role models than they currently have (youtubers? music artists - rappers? politicians?). Men of all ages need more third places to make friends, and date without apps that are frankly designed to make insecure men feel less valuable than women.

Would men be open to therapy? Maybe, but not all of them need it. Most men can point exactly towards what in society is peeving them. The system needs to change, rather than the individual.

[–] ilk@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

system needs to change, rather than the individual.

We can all agree; meanwhile nobody does anything... The individual can try to adapt using available resources as to not develop or try dealing with issues: spirituality and evidence-based therapy is a good start, and I believe that should be taught since childhood.

[–] august_senpai@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Have a problem? Go into therapy. Now you have two problems!

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago