this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
552 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
4795 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk’s X is throttling traffic to news and websites he dislikes | The site formerly known as Twitter has added a five-second delay when a user clicks on a shortened link to the New York Times,...::undefined

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 128 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

it’s just baby throwing his daily “look at meeeee!” tantrum.

it’ll pass when someone changes his diaper and gives him his binkie.

edit: oh, hey, look at that:

Musk's X delays links from rivals loading, then backtracks

[–] ciaocibai@lemmy.nz 56 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But he said he’s a free speech absolutest! How could this be? /s

If only he’d kept his mouth shut he’d probably be worth another 100billion. He reminds me of all the edge lords on 4chan, except with the unfortunate fact the media keeps reporting the dumb shit be says.

[–] BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

X aka Twitter has not been contacted for comment because it is known to only send a poop emoji in reply to media queries.

[–] Jerrimu2@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago

He just wants to say the n word.

“I’m African, so I can say it”

-elun muX

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

He said free speech, not timely speech /s

[–] avater@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry but which developer implements such dark patterns? I mean you have something called work ethic, you don't implement shit like that...

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're on a work visa and you don't want to get deported then you do what daddy Elon tells you.

[–] aragon@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

I wonder if anyone's image has crashed from such highs to such pathetic lows. At the end of the day, it was all PR but he still had the admiration of many people just a few years back i.e before the Thai submarine fiasco. Now most people consider him a petulant child man with a massive fortune. The only good outcome of this fall has been a clear understanding that earning wealth is purely based on luck. It doesnt matter if it is millions or billions ,nothing comes due to our own genius. It is a combination of factors that result in wealth but it is mostly determined at your birth. May be this episode will humble others who might have taken a similar path due to their inexplicable wealth.

[–] suckaduck@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago
[–] Potato_in_my_anus@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bappity@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

"but not for thee"

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There's Elon Musk spam on this community every day. Can we stop doing the billionaire's PR for him?

Downvote this garbage.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

If 1/2 the clowns that endlessly post anti-Twitter/anti-Musk stories would just STOP USING TWITTER, the entire site would collapse. Sick of seeing that asswipe's name, but I'm not on his goddamn platform. I don't drive his shitty cars. I won't fawn over every goddamn thing he does.

How much of an absolute douche do you have to be to make Zuck look good in comparison?!

You claim you hate the guy, but the fact that you have a Twitter account proves that was a lie.

[–] dub@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I agree, it's good to know these ridiculous actions he takes. It's not like it's positive for him

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Musk operates on the "There is no such thing as bad publicity model". He doesn't care if the news is bad or good so long as his name / businesses are in the 24-hour news cycle. It's stupid, but he gets idiots to bring him more attention.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is %100 wrong when your main source of revenue is advertising. Advertisers very much care about bad press.

[–] HellAwaits@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He doesn't care, yet he's suing an organization for reporting news on content on his website.

I think you need to check your facts.

[–] keefshape@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Your example fits into the 'any publicity is good publicity' mindset too, fyi.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Elon zucc cagefight bs is pointless muskspam. This is not

[–] HellAwaits@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here's a genius idea: block the content or ignore it.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 21 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The delayed websites included X’s online rivals Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky and Substack, as well as the Reuters wire service and the Times.

On Tuesday afternoon, hours after this story was first published, X began reversing the throttling on some of the sites, dropping the delay times back to zero.

Charlie Stadtlander, a spokesman for the Times, said in a statement that the news outlet has “made similar observations of our own” about the systemic delays and “not received any explanation from the platform about this move.”

“While we don’t know the rationale behind the application of this time delay, we would be concerned by targeted pressure applied to any news organization for unclear reasons,” he said.

“Writers cannot build sustainable businesses if their connection to their audience depends on unreliable platforms that have proven they are willing to make changes that are hostile to the people who use them.”

Links to Facebook, Instagram and the new microblogging service Threads were all throttled; all three are owned by Meta, whose founder and chief Mark Zuckerberg has been locked in an ongoing online feud with Musk over not-yet-existent plans for a mixed-martial-arts fight.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] i_am_hungry@meganice.online 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why are so many people still using Twitter, what will it take for people to leave? Musk could probably charge $10 per tweet and bunch of people would be fine with that.

[–] DogsShouldRuleUs@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The same reason 2016 happened. Lots of mentally broken people in this country. Just watched a manager, old guy, at work, go off to another old co-worker about "did you hear about what they're doing to skittles? With the fucking trans colors!?" knuckle dragging rabble rabble THEY WERE ALREADY A RAINBOW.

[–] keefshape@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

There are so many other valid arguements against skittles (my favorite candy). Idk whether to facepalm or guffaw that fucking skittles are now on the map to fight against.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly with how fast threads, brand new, was able to jump into this compared to the growth of mastodon, I'm convinced the only thing that can convince most people to stop using a corperate bloated social media site from hell is a new, slightly less bloated (so far) corperate social media site from hell.

Twitter won't die all the way until we have something else we want to die

People will never accept that part of the problem is themselves.

Hell, even I still use Twitter sometimes. I admit I am part of the problem. Other people won't at least try to be honest about it.

Then they complain. That just shows that they're not actually upset at the existence of sites like Twitter, they're just upset they're not the ones running them.

The vast majority of human beings in this country are so toxic.

[–] there1snospoon@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago

The removal of the capability to make money on it as a platform.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So some more lawsuits then, I guess. This can't be legal.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Before Net Neutrality was tossed, it wasn't

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Meta and their army of lawyers might still find a way. Can't hurt if they'd try something useful for a change.

[–] 40hands@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Petulant melon husk at it again.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

No time to fight that ginger robot when you're fighting the urge to ruin everything around you.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Lmao! Sounds like some pretty shit he would do.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Muuuhaha... the Elon child :-)

[–] ACabrio@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago

That's Elon Musk. So this is not surprising.