this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
228 points (97.1% liked)

Work Reform

10045 readers
1265 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The sorry state of streaming residuals shows why SAG and the WGA are striking.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Damn. That payout is a disgrace.

To clarify, this is how much "residual" pay the writers got out of the show being streamed after production. Imagine being a writer on one the biggest shows on a platform, and all you get for it being successful is like a tenth of a months rent.

[–] pizzahoe@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

The truth is these companies won't give in unless the strike starts hitting their revenue.. there needs to be a lot of shows on hold and garbage movies produced over time due to lack of good writers, only then something will happen.. which i think is going to be a long fight. I'm hopeful that some good comes out of this strike for the labour.

[–] 47_alpha_tango@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I hope the writers get what they want. The problem is that the strikes are actually saving the studios money so it won’t be soon.

[–] druidgreeneyes@discuss.online 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could you elaborate on this?

[–] 47_alpha_tango@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Daily Mail isn't journalism. They're complete trash. Trust them like you would a used car sales in man in a cheap suit.

[–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

For me it's any salesman wearing whatever.

[–] druidgreeneyes@discuss.online 7 points 1 year ago

I’m taking that one with a grain of salt; it’s coming from the mouth of one ceo, with little to no apparent fact-checking, through a paper that has been widely criticized for sensationalism and unreliability in its reporting.

source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can't take the company at their word on that. They're in the middle of a labour action, of course they're not going to go on about how much effect the strike is having on them, that's counter to the goals of starving the other side out.

And anyways, this is saving money in the sense that burning down one's house will save money on rent.

[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Saving money, according to the studios. That's the studio bullshitting to intimidate people.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Saving them money now for massively reduced future revenue though.

[–] teft@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

Now that is a stat that puts into perspective why the actors and writers are striking.