this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
1867 points (97.1% liked)
Comic Strips
14975 readers
4791 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Now we need a version with the guy wearing a "don't vote" cap and saying "this is all the Dems fault".
The Democrats not once but twice lost to him. Who do you suggest we blame if not the candidates that lost?
I blame Republican voter suppression and supporting a candidate that tried and failed at insurrection.
The voters, genuinely. Because they misunderstood what the vote meant. It wasn't about electing a democrating candidate, it was about keeping Trump out of office*. Note that this is not limited to non-voters, but includes every american.
*: This is not what a vote for the president is meant to be about. But hey, desperate times, desperate measures, that kinda stuff.
Whose job is it to inform voters if not the candidates themselves?
This mentality is exactly what allowed Democrats to move so far to the right and lose their base. This time around the Democratic candidates were literally engaging in genocide, attacking immigrants, and attacking the working class while trying to claim that they were the "good guys." You can only do that when your sole appeal is "well at least we're not Republicans" rather than having anything meaningful to point to to actually demonstrate that you deserve to win. Diet Republicanism isn't appealing to anyone and these candidates completely and voluntarily chose to run on that platform even going as far as wasting weeks of campaigning in order to court Dick Cheney's approval. It was another colossal fuck up by the DNC that once again lead to Donald Trump winning the presidency.
So a mass of Americans misunderstood something about politics and that's the voters fault. Ok. Sure. Ill give you that. But if only there was a major political party we could use to communicate with a mass of these Americans and correct the record.
Oh, wait, that's literally the job the Democratic party. You can come up with any excuse; voters, Republicans, misinformation, media, etc. But at the end of the day the party that is actually responsible for combatting those things failed. They failed to communicate with the American people. They are run by a bunch of rich old boomers with zero connection or understanding to the workers of America.
If you don't criticize the party and instead let them get away with "blaming voters" then they will never actually change their policies and messaging that has failed them over and over again.
Seriously, if the problems is actually voters then isn't the solution in changing the actual platform we use to communicate with voters? Because if that platform isn't working then we should blame that platform as well. Actually, we should focus on the problems with that platform BECAUSE that is what is used to change voters minds.
If the dems required we all support a literal far right fascist genocide, or else let trump take office, then the dems are fascists. The fascist dems can go fuck themselves right along with the fascist republicans. I dont vote in support of genocide of innocents, and neither should any of you. regardless of the cost..
And so you voted by splitting your vote based on your local outcome. Which still, factually makes you have voted for either of the two.
One of which also wants your cost of living to go up (and is doing that now), social security to go down (and is doing that right now), reduce oversight of large corporations, massively expand corruption and corporate control of the government, reduce public safety and limit personal liberties.
If you got a choice between +9-1 and -11 (bonus for the Reps accelerating the genocide instead of abiding it) , and that's your two options, you don't pick the latter. And not voting is the same as voting for the local majority, so it matters fuck all what your intent was.
You, also, misunderstood what the vote was about, quite clearly.
Frame it how you'd like, and I'll frame it how I like. And I'll happily vote similarly in 2026 and 2028 too. Until the dems get more scared of losing elections from a lack of progressive support than they are scared of losing far right AIPAC donations, they get zero support from me and the progressives I know, and they cant win an election without us unless they find a whole lot of republican votes-- which they have zero chance of getting.
Let us know how that turns out. Until then, get used to AIPAC buying you like a cheap mercenary to support ever greater war crimes. Even after they kill everyone in Gaza and the west bank, they wont stop there. Its on to Lebanon, Jordan, and Syria, then Egypt. Someone needs man/woman-up and tell them no.
People like you silencing dissent is precisely how the DNC deluded themselves into believing they could win while running to the right.
The only time we see the democrats accede to popular opinion and do the things they need to get elected is when is so exceedingly obvious that there is no other path that they can't pretend otherwise, and the moment that pressure lets up, they will stop. They only told Biden to drop out when he had no path to victory, and the moment Kamala looked like she'd win, the dems embraced every policy that had killed the Biden campaign.
They had polling data, they knew that banning tiktok wouldn't increase their chances to win, but they did it anyway. They knew that sending cops to kick the shit out of politically active college students wouldn't help them win, but they did it anyway, because they thought they could do that and still win.
Oh I think you misunderstand me.
I'm not criticising who disagree with both parties, just those that did not vote and now want to pretend that didn't have an effect largely the same as a vote. Most voting systems cannot model non-voting, and hence it ends up being a vote in effect, and for whom is something you let somebody else decide then. It's silly to pretend otherwise. Abstaining means giving a vote to someone who you know won't win, that's the only way sadly.
To make abstaining visible you'd have to say, directly assign seats if the house to parties including that the percentage of non-voters forces seats to be left vacant or such. But I'm not sure anybody uses something like that, don't think so.
Hope you liked having a country and a future in it as much as I did. Be a pity if you didn't care about what you lost us with your "protest vote."
Sometimes I think Democrat establishment bootlickers actually wanted to lose just so they could write comments like this.
Are you gonna be like the lady that called ICE on her neighbor because the son voted for Trump to get his parents deported? Like, you have no actual moral compass. You just want your team to win and will attack anyone that might hurt your team. You're attacking people that are against genocide for not voting for a candidate that supports genocide.
... Huh? I think I've just met the most insane person on this site. How ya doing?
So it's cool to support fascism just as long as you're in the in-group at the time? There was zero need for Dems to support fascism but apparently Biden and Harris thought it was more important to protect it than defeat Donald Trump.
I mean, good attempt, but failed. I don't support fascism which is why I didn't vote for a fascist. I don't support genocide which is why I didn't vote for the person that would fully embrace it in two countries. You can get off my junk now, thanks.
So you voted for the one that fully supported it in one country? Or did you not vote for either of the major parties and are a hypocrite?
And what exactly was your basement dweller best option? Because I sure did vote Harris. She was the best option. I wasn't going to not vote, I wasn't going to vote Russia which precluded Stein and Trump, and I certainly wasn't going to doom three countries with a Trump vote. There were no good or perfect options. I went with the best of them.
That's the difference between the commenter above you and you. You're happy to live in a country where your living conditions and your future are assured, even if it genocides people elsewhere. I'd say what I think about your stance if it didn't violate the civility rules.
And yet people voted a fascist into office who is now actively acclerating genocide including wanting a country fully depopulated.
And yet the democrat administration couldn't possibly run a campaign with more likeable policy and candidates than Trump, which is quite possibly the worst US president.
Lol goodbye Palestine any fucking way, friend. Those of us with a functioning brain knew that was obvious with Trump. Oh, but now they'll get ethnically cleansed for a golf course co-owned by Trump and Israel! Hope your sanctimony warms the empty space in your head.
That's a lot of words for saying you don't care about the deaths of Arabs as long as you reap the benefits in the imperial core.
The dude is laughing about genocide while fantasizing about additional genocides against people who disagree with him. He obviously has MAGA brain rot syndrome.
If I had a nickel every time I saw a liberal in glee about Palestine in the last 4 years, I'd have enough to move out of this hellhole.
As someone from a place with compulsory voting and would vote regardless. You, I would vote any prick that stayed home and didn't vote. Especially when rates are less than half the voting population.
So I'd say that's heavily weighted to a large portion of the population that just has zero say (statically) over the election. The electoral college makes our elections statistically pointless for 43/50 states. So any "stay as home" people or "blue states shifting red" are just a reflection of how little people have faith in the democratic party. But not actually a reflection of what lost the election.
For example, I live in Washington, there is just no statistical way my state goes for Trump. So I voted for the PSL candidate for president and went Democrat down the ballot the rest of the way.
As far as the presidential vote goes I am essentially the same as a non voter. But that did NOT matter at all. My state went blue. And my PSL vote was influenced by that. If I was in Georgia (my previous home state) I'd have voted for Harris.
I feel like the focus on the "protest vote" is trivial. The states that mattered lost the non political person to the couch because the Democrats couldn't message to them enough to get them to care to drive to the polls.
At the end of the day. The Dems lost because they didn't give any progressive minded people a reason to get off the couch on election day. They instead spent their whole campaign trying to "turn" voters they could never win on issues like "tough on immigrant" policies.
The non-voters obviously. How is that so difficult for you to understand?